Attorney Philip Berg, advisor for the Plaintiff in Hollister v. Soetoro, issued a press release regarding the basis for the appeal of this case: For Immediate Release: – 04/09/2009 Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed We will be ...
Attorney John D. Hemenway, having filed as an interpleader for Hollister v. Soetoro, has been reprimanded for his help in bringing what Judge James Robertson termed a “legally frivolous lawsuit:” 27.OrderFindingRule11Violation-3-24-2008 While it is the judge’s prerogative to rule as he has done, I do find his sarcastic tone rather disconcerting, especially with respect to those who ...
Yesterday, Gregory Hollister, Plaintiff in Hollister v. Soetoro, had appealed his case to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Hollister – Notice of Appeal FreeRepublic.com shows the current docket info: 03/17/2009 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [09-5080] 03/17/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL filed [1170878] by Mr. Gregory S. Hollister of decision of U.S. District Court. [09-5080] 03/18/2009 Open ...
Leo Donofrio speaks out once again concerning the quo warranto statute, referring Vattel and US Attorney Jeff Taylor (full posting below). He also speaks on what he sees as the futility of current eligibility litigation: In parts 1, 2 and 3 of my quo warranto legal brief, I laid the case out for the various processes under the District of Columbia ...
(Thanks to commenter “Obot 1024″ for the info) In his final ruling of the case, Hollister v. Soetoro, USDC for DC Judge James Robertson ordered the Court-admitted attorney, Mr. John D. Hemenway, to essentially show why he should not be sanctioned for having brought this eligibility case before the Court. The below is Mr. Hemenway’s response to Judge ...
Here’s the actual Order: Dismissed Publish at Scribd or explore others: Legal Research legal dismiss The full memo from Judge Robertson follows, including my commentary (all commentary about this dismissal associated with the previous Hollister v. Soetoro posting has been deleted; feel free to comment on this posting)… ...
The Order is on the first page. To date, it is not officially known yet that the judge has signed off on the following. 134576-2094506-0 Publish at Scribd or explore others: Legal Research Bottom line: Mr. Berg and Joyce would be admitted to represent the Plaintiff in this ...
From the judge: ORDER Plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss [#13] was illegible on most of the Court’s computers, as was plaintiff’s response to the Court’s order to show cause [#15], because plaintiff filed documents scanned with resolutions so fine that they overwhelmed the Court’s CM/ECF system. On the Court’s website, go to ECF Filing Pointers and then to Attorney’s Checklist, for ...
Here it is: Instead of the opposition plaintiff was ordered to file by 2/13/09 (or defendants’ motion to dismiss would be granted as conceded, see [#10]), what plaintiff filed was (a) the affidavit of a paralegal (who works in the office of a Pennsylvania lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in this Court), complaining about ...
While FreeRepublic.com is reporting that this Declaration — authored by Lisa Liberi, Philip Berg’s assistant and paralegal — was entered on February 17, 2009, the actual Declaration (Scribd) admits to being filed on February 13, 2008. The Declaration is a short five pager and definitely worth the read, as it stipulates that Ms. Liberi is being encumbered ...
The following is the order of US District Judge James Robertson to Philip Berg’s amended complaint for Hollister v. Soetoro: Plaintiff’s amended complaint [#11] adds nothing to the original complaint except rhetoric and legal theory and creates no obligation upon the defendants to respond to it. Nor is the amended complaint responsive to defendants’ motion to dismiss ...
The following Order from DC District Court Judge James Robertson was issued for Hollister v. Soetoro yesterday: ORDER Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3] is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for the admission pro hac vice of ...
I just received a copy of the Motion to Dismiss in Philip Berg’s recent case, Hollister v. Soetoro. Aside from the usual defensive arguments, the following footnotes are very telling: Regarding Berg’s claim of ineligibility: 1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu ...
Today, Philip Berg, attorney and Plaintiff in Berg v. Obama, reports from obamacrimes.com (CitizenWells also reporting) that he and co-counsel Lawrence J. Joyce are representing retired Colonel Gregory S. Hollister of Colorado Springs, CO, who is filing suit against Barry Soetoro a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama in the United States District for DC, demanding to know if ...