Comments on: Local News Coverage of Georgia Obama Ballot Access Challenge

By: bob

bob — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:30:52 +0000

The appeals will be fruitless, and the case will never be heard by SCOTUS.
The only interesting issue is how far the plaintiffs will get by March 6.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:44:54 +0000

It would be an unlikely case of first impression, but how the appeal advances could lead to framing several issues in a way that gets the case before the Court. The NBC issue may be indirectly resolved with strong dicta or the old footnote comment that is supposed to be tangential, but often says a lot.

It looks like there will be an appeal from Van Irion. Stay tuned, as I ‘m sure you will.

By: bob

bob — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:59:01 +0000

Maybe this will reach the Supreme Court, maybe not.
The U.S. Supreme Court is not going take a case to affirm the sitting president’s ability to run for re-election.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:22:06 +0000

Taitz’s behavior is extremely unbecoming. (Bob)

C’mon Sharon. We’re letting you have The Very Last Word. Give it your best shit. (GJD)

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:21:16 +0000

Taitz’s behavior is extremely unbecoming.

I totally agree.

C’mon Sharon. We’re letting you have The Very Last Word. Give it your best shit.

You know since you have resorted to speaking in this manner, you have lost control.

I am not going to excoriate Judge Mahili for his decision. He could have accepted or rejected the Ankeny opinion since it was not binding. If an appeal moves forward, then the appellate court will render its decision. Maybe this will reach the Supreme Court, maybe not. If it does, there will be FINALITY of the issue, which is what I personally would like to see, no matter which way it goes. Many say it is already final. I don’t agree.

People who exhibit your haughty attitude promote division in this country. I don’t have any direct evidence, but I believe your excrement exudes odor just like that of the “little” people.

By: GeorgetownJD

GeorgetownJD — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:03:42 +0000

Phil, please correct my tyop. Tiny keyboard on this Android.

By: GeorgetownJD

GeorgetownJD — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:01:19 +0000

Bob, Sharon likes to have the last word. Let her. She’s angry because the birthers finally got their long awaited hearing “on the merits” and though they presented their case unopposed and without objection to the hearsay and inadmissibilty of their so-called evidence, they still lost. The judge found the evidence to be lacking in credibility and the legal argument contrary to established principles. Sharon is lashing out and I’m the bullseye of her target because I (like you) predicted the outcome.

C’mon Sharon. We’re letting you have The Very Last Word. Give it your best sh[o]t.

By: bob

bob — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:23:40 +0000

Interesting to see an attorney encouraging disrespect.

Taitz’s behavior is extremely unbecoming.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:04:52 +0000

Interesting to see an attorney encouraging disrespect. Good for you.

By: GeorgetownJD

GeorgetownJD — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:16:49 +0000

Now you are catching on. Good for you.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:11:44 +0000

Be disrespectful and don’t bother showing up if you feel that you will be entering a circus. Your instincts guarantee your win.

By: GeorgetownJD

GeorgetownJD — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:05:03 +0000

Apparently Mr. Jablonski’s instincts were right. His client prevailed.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:08:39 +0000

Did I post my CV? I don’t seem to recall doing that. I suppose you are familiar with the adage don’t ask a question that you don’t know the answer to?

By: GeorgetownJD

GeorgetownJD — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:08:24 +0000

And I wonder why someone who has never attended law school presumes to know what professors teaching professional responsibility would tell their students.

By: sharon2

sharon2 — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:02:27 +0000

I wonder why a person named GeorgetownJD initiates her comment as a teenaged “texter” would? Some subtlety involved?