2008 Election

This is where the action is regarding President-elect Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility

2010 Election

Will the Dems lose their majorities by November 2, 2010?

Initiatives

American reform has always started from the bottom, up. Track various State-based reformation initiatives here

Money

It makes the world go around, especially DC and Wall Street

Qualifications

Who’s checking up on officeholder eligibility? Find out here

Home » Activism, Eligibility, POTUS

Eligibility Update: Martin Seeks KBC Grand Jury Probe; HI State Senator on COLBs; Media Blackout on Eligibility?

Submitted by Phil on Tue, Aug 4, 200920 Comments
Eligibility Update: Martin Seeks KBC Grand Jury Probe; HI State Senator on COLBs; Media Blackout on Eligibility?

Now that eligibility attorney Dr. Orly Taitz has made a Letter Rogatory motion on a purported Obama Kenyan Birth Registration document, law professor Andy Martin, Plaintiff in Martin v. Lingle, is calling on Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert Mueller to open a grand jury probe on the document (excerpted):

…The “Kenyan birth certificate” (“KBC”)(which is admittedly not a birth certificate eo nomine) was filed in a federal court. There is a high probability that the document is a forgery.

My PhotoBut who forged the KBC? Was it opponents or proponents? When was the KBC forged? I have publicly adduced one theory, and suggested the existence of a second, more sinister, explanation for the appearance of the document. But no one really knows.

Someone apparently forged a birth document concerning the President of the United States. The American people have a right to a thorough and impartial investigation of this matter.

If it turns out that someone in fact forged the KBC to obstruct justice, then that person should be criminally prosecuted. There is no place for forgery or lies on either side of the Obama birth controversy. I have consistently rejected lies as an appropriate response to Barack Obama’s own stream of distortions and fabrications.

Because the document is on file in a federal court, and because the document may represent an attempt to obstruct justice, the Department of Justice indisputably has jurisdiction to conduct an investigation of such a document.

Most respectfully, I would urge you to do the following:

First, I would suggest you consider appointing an independent counsel (or “special prosecutor”), preferably someone who is a Republican but an attorney who has a criminal justice, and not an actively political, background.

Second, if a preliminary review of the document reveals that it is not authentic, and I am sure that will not take a great deal of effort on a threshold basis, I would suggest you allow the counsel to convene a grand jury to investigate the provenance of the material. Even a forged document can have a continuing corrosive effect on the legitimacy of the president. …

TexasDarlin echos Mr. Martin’s sentiments; I similarly believe that an investigation into Mr. Obama’s background documentation is a worthy endeavor.

To that end, TCOTReport posted an interview they had with Hawaii Democratic State Senator Will Espero, confirming that he is, in fact, going to be introducing legislation that would allow disclosure of documents such as Mr. Obama’s vital records…

In an exclusive interview with The TCOT Report, Hawaii Democratic State Senator Will Espero today confirmed that he intends to introduce legislation that will allow the public disclosure of Barack Obama’s 1961 Certificate of Live Birth.

“I have no doubt President Obama was born in Hawaii. Most of us have no doubt. We believe he was born here. I don’t know what’s wrong with being able to confirm someone was born in the USA.”

“ The purpose of the legislation I’m considering is to make original birth records open for everybody. We should allow someone to look at the birth records. Whatever information we are utilizing should be public…not public on demand, but if you make an appointment, you can look at it, the original document. It’s just a matter of transparency that needs to be answered.”

“At present, the bill is being worked on internally in my office. I have not discussed it with Dr. Fukino, our Secretary of Health.”

When asked his response to the question if the Obama Administration might oppose his legislation, Espero responded: “ I never thought they would view it unfavorably. If they do I’m just going to scratch my head. What’s there to hide? My intention is to introduce the bill when the legislature reconvenes in January.”

News of Senator Espero’s intention to introduce a birth certificate transparency bill was first reported in the Honolulu Star Bulletin last month.

Espero was first elected to the Hawaii State Senate in 1992. A graduate of the University of Seattle, Senator Espero was born in Japan to Filipino parents. His website states that it his personal goal to be the first United States Senator of Filipino heritage.

Northeast Intelligence Network founder Douglas Hagmann and journalist Judi McLeod have posted an article on CanadaFreePress in which they claim that there is documented evidence that the mainstream media explicitly censored any mention of presidential eligibility during the 2008 election cycle:

Do you remember Watergate? Thirty-five years ago this Sunday, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal. There was the crime – the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixonadministration. There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall ofthe Nixon administration. It was a politically critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution.

Now, we potentially face a new constitutional crisis stemming from the refusal of Barack Hussein Obama to produce a one-page document that would confirm his eligibility to hold the highest office in the land. Eligibility to hold office is not a “fringe” matter, but a core constitutional issue that lies at the very heart of a growing controversy.

Although we do not have the birth certificate or proof of ineligibility, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press have documentation of a cover-up relating to the issue of Obama’s eligibility to hold office.The proof we possess not only exposes a well orchestrated cover-up, but also provides critical insight into why the topic of Obama’s eligibility has failed to gain traction in the corporate media.

The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are in possession of extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career – or worse – should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.

After receiving and authenticating the document, US based veteran private investigator Douglas J. Hagmann opened a full scale investigation into the media blackout, with specific emphasis on tracing the blackout origins to those issuing them. This investigation was conducted in conjunction with Judi McLeod, founding editor of Canada Free Press and Brian Thompson, CFP Information Technology chief following a meeting near Toronto, Ontario last December. At that meeting, it was decided to keep the existence of the document secret until additional evidence could be obtained.

Today, after an extensive eight month investigation, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are breaking their silence and revealing explosive information about a widespread cover-up that began at the earliest stages of the Obamapresidential campaign. The cover-up traces back to some of the most powerful and influential people in the U.S. and continues today.

Summary of the Evidence

As noted above, we are in possession of a written account by a well known national talk show host who details how he was prohibited to discuss the controversy of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility as president of the United States. This signed document cites exact dates and times when he was forbidden to discuss any aspect of the birth certificate controversy, and includes direct references to the individuals responsible for such prohibitions. Further, his statement identifies the individuals who originated the orders and their positions, and confirms that failure to adhere to the order would likely end his career in that industry. He also confirms that other, less specific but more menacing threats were implied during conversations with those making the subject off limits.

Although we possess the original document containing the name and contact information of the talk show host, we have decided not to publish his name or network affiliation at this time. Based on the correspondence from this individual and respecting the nature of the threats to him personally and professionally, it is our decision to allow him to enjoy anonymity until such time as he decides to reveal the facts himself at a time of his choosing.

From multiple interviews conducted within the last eight months, we have obtained information from other sources, independent of the above, who have also been instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs, to wit:

The account of an administrative assistant employed in New York City by a cable network news station who provided significant, detailed information of a 2008 meeting between the top network executive and four-(4) well-known news anchors. This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.

Present at this meeting, she verified that the network official issued “warnings” to the personalities “to avoid any on-air discussion of the birth place, eligibility, and news accounts of litigation compelling [Barack Hussein] Obama to produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate.” She stated that the network executive had her arrange the conference immediately following a meeting “between [the network executive] and an attorney closely associated with candidate Obama who was acting on his behalf.”

The statement of a corporate secretary for a major news network confirming the existence of a one-page inter-office memo, bearing the markings “confidential” and “not for dissemination,” addressed and distributed to news anchors and on-air talent” that specifically instructed the recipients to avoid any discussion pertaining to the Obamabirth certificate controversy. The memo was written and distributed in October 2008, and specifically instructed on-air talent to “advise guests, as necessary, to refrain from citing any news story, legal proceedings, Internet ‘blogs’ or other sources that pertain to the ongoing eligibility controversy of future President Barack Obama.”

As outlined above, our Investigation has uncovered both direct and indirect evidence of threats being made against some of the nation’s top radio and television personalities, which would explain some giving this topic mere lip service. As one source interviewed during the course of this investigation stated, “I’ve got a career and family to think about.”

Although no one should be surprised over the manipulation of the news, the nature of this manipulation, and the extent of the threats against journalists, should shock even the most well grounded.

Any reasonable person must question the motivation of the media moguls. The individuals who have – and continue to threaten talk show hosts, news anchors, and others are the top people. We are not talking about mid or upper level management – this is from the very top in all cases. If there is nothing to the birth certificate issue and the question of eligibility, why the secrecy? [emphases original]

Also, check out how Charles Kerchner, lead Plaintiff in Kerchner v. Obama, converted radio talk show host Bill Cunningham into a “birther.”

See the following links regarding the eligibility saga:

-Phil

Subscriptions -=- Twitter: @trsol -=- Facebook (TRSoL) -=- Facebook (Rightside Phil)

20 Comments »

  • Joen says:

    “Someone apparently forged a birth document concerning the President of the United States. The American people have a right to a thorough and impartial investigation of this matter.”

    -Andy Martin

    No sh*t, Sherlock, the forged birth certificate has been sitting on the Internet since June 12, 2008. Where’s the call for an investigation???

    “I similarly believe that an investigation into Mr. Obama’s background documentation is a worthy endeavor.”

    -TexasDarlin

    Oh, really? From someone who consistently has been against requests for Obama’s long-form birth certificate?

    When was their epiphany, exactly?

  • observer says:

    sue says:
    August 6, 2009 at 7:33 am

    Birth certificates are NOT “public records”, they are correctly classified as “restricted records.”

    Apparently that great public servant – Congress – didn’t agree with you in the case of proof of qualifications of one of the candidates – McCain!

  • [...] Phil wrote an interesting post today onThe Right Side of Life » Eligibility Update: Martin Seeks KBC <b>…</b>Here’s a quick excerpt [...]

  • sue says:

    “Yes there should be the ability to examine all Public Records, but in person and only for your own use, not to distribute unfettered for personal gain.”

    Birth certificates are NOT “public records”, they are correctly classified as “restricted records.” I cannot think of one reason whatsoever why someone would need to see my birth certificate other than when it is in MY possession and I am the one allowing someone to see it to prove my citizenship/place of birth. Birth certificates also contain medical information that is just no one else’s business.

  • Mike says:

    brygenon says:
    August 5, 2009 at 3:10 am

    C. N. Natus imagined:

    Remember, whenever Obama may be found to be ineligible, his presidential acts cease to be legitimate; and the laws of the country revert to what was prior to his usurpation.

    I expect when Obama is found to be ineligible, he’ll cordially welcome the new President and government will continue smoothly. That’s how things went with all four previous ineligible Presidents

    ——————-
    Joe Biden President? I shudder to think what would happen if he became President and was then unable to fulfill his duties.

    We all know who is next in line after him. That could turn out to be even worse than Obama

  • bystander says:

    MoniQue says:

    Problem with the Australian birth certificate:

    THE DATE AT THE TOP: “10 APRIL”

    THE NUMERAL ” 1 ” IS IN A DIFFERENT FONT (CALLED TYPEFACE BACK THEN). it should be in COURIER typeface, but it is not. Compare that numeral one to the others and you’ll see it……

    This is really simple – for the rest of the document a lower case L has been used for the numeral 1. As anyone my age that remembers manual typewriters can attest, this was very common as the L was much easier to reach than the 1.

  • PhilMB says:

    WRT Records Access: Back in the 70’s I used to hit the County Courthouses and search through the Birth, Death, Mortgage, and other Public Records for my job. I had to sign in at the desk before access, and other than my own pen and paper could take or mark on nothing. No problem. Then a cretin from the local newsrag culled the list of all Concealed Carry Permit holders, which they published along with each address from it and the surrounding counties – over four full-sized pages to go along with their anti-gun, anti-freedom screeds. Needless to say the uproar was immediate – especially from the political mavens!

    Yes there should be the ability to examine all Public Records, but in person and only for your own use, not to distribute unfettered for personal gain.

  • Jacqlyn Smith says:

    JeffM says:
    August 5, 2009 at 1:08 am

    Excellent. We demand answers as to where all these forgeries are coming from. After all, the internet is now the definitive answer to legal questions like where someone is born or whether they qualify for a top government position.

    Without the internet we would have no way of vetting future usurpers in order for them to get into office illegally, so get cracking Mr. Holder!!!

    ****************************************************************************

    Jeff—-Holder is a COWARD….the man needs to be fired!!!

  • sue says:

    Phil,

    “…Whatever information we are utilizing should be public…not public on demand, but if you make an appointment, you can look at it, the original document.”

    Nope, I would not want just anyone having access to my original birth certificate. And, yes I read the article.

  • Phil says:

    sue,

    I suspect the citizen’s of Hawaii will have a problem with their birth certificate being “public record” as fraud and false identification is too serious a problem to allow that. I certainly know that I would protest/fight my birth certificate becoming public record in the State I live in.

    I think if you read the article, you will find this tid-bit:

    …Whatever information we are utilizing should be public…not public on demand, but if you make an appointment, you can look at it, the original document.

    It doesn’t sound to me like the intended legislation is meant to allow no-holds-barred access to the information; merely, reducing the number of hoops to jump through in order to verify information.

    -Phil

  • observer says:

    Unfortunate but pragmatic for these times, asking already corrupted departments of power in THIS government to turn over a new leaf and become honest, transparent, and free from Alinsky thug control may only result in using that corrupted power to rubber stamp forgeries and more obfuscation of the matter. And in the end they could say that it was all done “in cooperation with” the other side!!

    I believe it’s far better to try and find honest brokers in honest, local courts who still feel it necessary to follow the law and let the evidence be breathed in by the public. An irrefutable foundation should be properly laid without corruption rather than try some monumental but unreflective “gotcha” approach. That approach may prove to be, once again, very naive with THIS bunch.

  • sue says:

    I suspect the citizen’s of Hawaii will have a problem with their birth certificate being “public record” as fraud and false identification is too serious a problem to allow that. I certainly know that I would protest/fight my birth certificate becoming public record in the State I live in.

  • MoniQue says:

    Problem with the Australian birth certificate:

    THE DATE AT THE TOP: “10 APRIL”

    THE NUMERAL ” 1 ” IS IN A DIFFERENT FONT (CALLED TYPEFACE BACK THEN). it should be in COURIER typeface, but it is not. Compare that numeral one to the others and you’ll see it.

    Courier numeral one has a straight line along the top AND a straight line along the bottom. It is also identical to the lower case letter “l” – back then this was true and the number one could be used interchangeably with the letter “l”

    But on the ausie birth certificate date at the top the “1″ has a slanted top and NO LINE ALONG THE BOTTOM. Ariel font numeral one is slanted without a seriff along the bottom. But they did not have ariel back then, perhaps Universal typeface.

    But certainly is a problem for the ausie document.

  • brygenon says:

    C. N. Natus imagined:

    Remember, whenever Obama may be found to be ineligible, his presidential acts cease to be legitimate; and the laws of the country revert to what was prior to his usurpation.

    I expect when Obama is found to be ineligible, he’ll cordially welcome the new President and government will continue smoothly. That’s how things went with all four previous ineligible Presidents.

  • Benaiah says:

    CNN = Communist News Network

  • JeffM says:

    Excellent. We demand answers as to where all these forgeries are coming from. After all, the internet is now the definitive answer to legal questions like where someone is born or whether they qualify for a top government position.

    Without the internet we would have no way of vetting future usurpers in order for them to get into office illegally, so get cracking Mr. Holder!!!

  • Phil says:

    Civis Naturaliter Natus,

    Hey, Phil,

    I really like that nifty “edit your post” in the next 5 minutes function, which you just added to this site!

    Good deal. I had some extra time this evening to do some searching for a reasonable plug-in. We’ll see how it goes.

    -Phil

  • Civis Naturaliter Natus says:

    Hey, Phil,

    I really like that nifty “edit your post” in the next 5 minutes function, which you just added to this site!

  • Civis Naturaliter Natus says:

    I am glad one HI politician is moving towards disclosure.

    If Obama Team opposes his bill, it will look really bad for Obama’s veracity and eligibility…

    Remember, whenever Obama may be found to be ineligible, his presidential acts cease to be legitimate; and the laws of the country revert to what was prior to his usurpation.

  • Jacqlyn Smith says:

    August 4, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    A blogger at citizen wells writes……..

    Joseph Farah on Twitter:

    It’s still coming — maybe tomorrow

    about 3 hours ago from web
    ************************************
    The big story I promised you last week on eligibility issue was NOT the Kenyan birth document. I didn’t even know about that last week.

    about 3 hours ago from web
    *****************************
    Most popular question in my email box today: Why is Hillary in Kenya?

    about 3 hours ago from web

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.