Kerchner v. Obama Eligibility Ad Placed in Weekly Paper
Submitted by Phil on Mon, Jul 13, 200914 Comments
Charles Kerchner, lead Plaintiff in Kerchner v. Obama, placed another advertisement in the weekly edition of the Washington Times today. This week marks the second week in a row that the following ad has run in the newspaper:
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Advertorial in 20090713 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 9
Mr. Kerchner has recently set up a web site, ProtectOurLiberty.org, wherein he is soliciting further donations to help defray the costs of placing these ads. The site goes into a full explanation of the costs involved as well as the types of advertising that is being supported by donations.
See the following links regarding the eligibility saga:
- Obama’s Presidential Eligibility: What You Need to Know
- Obama’s Sealed Background Documentation
- What’s the Difference Between a Birth Certification Versus a Birth Certificate?
- Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth
- Obama Citizenship Facts
- The State Department and Sen. Patrick Leahy’s (D-VT) Natural Born Citizen Resolution (April 10, 2008)
- Citizen Grand Jury Updates and Eligibility Lawsuit Listing
-Phil
Black Lion says:
July 13, 2009 at 10:29 am
The question remains, what does placing advertisements have to do with the filing of a legal case? Are we attempting to influence the jury? How is advertising a legal strategy ? Just wondering…
======================
It has nothing to do with the filing it has every thing to do with trying to make people aware of the traitors in Congress, the white house, the media and fools who post dribble here.
earl says:
July 14, 2009 at 7:26 am
Black Lion says:
July 13, 2009 at 10:29 am
“The question remains, what does placing advertisements have to do with the filing of a legal case?”
- $ -
Exactly Earl. Orly, Berg, Andy Martin, Apuzzo, Swensson and Campbell, they all have the desire for money in common. WND wants you to donate. All over their sites they request “donations” to the cause. It seems like this “Obama was not born in the US” issue is a real money maker. Donations are being given with no sort of accounting at all. It makes you wonder where all that money is going.
HistorianDude says:
July 14, 2009 at 11:57 am
The standing issue is not a defense that the Defendants can invoke this time, because Alan Keyes was a presidential candidate on the CA Ballot. He has a right to challenge the qualifications or eligibility of any candidate to be on the Ballot and the other candidates have the right to do the same to Dr. Keyes. This case will be heard on the merits because of the instructions of the Judge. The mere instruction of the Court was to serve the U.S. Attorney that day and the reason Dr. Keyes will win this case is Bush v. Gore has set the framework for Presidential Challenges in Federal Court, where even in that case the initial filing was in FL State Court. All the elements are there for this one!!!! Berg and other cases are far from this case because of the precedence established in the 2000 election.
Reading a little bit about Jacqlyn Smith’s post: Good evening everybody and thanks a million for tuning in tonight as I have had to replace cnn the brainwashing and braindead network for your local commentary on the news. My commentary on this is real simple and pragmatic and should be in line with everybody’s sentiments including those who voted for Barack Obama. The Democrats won the election there is nothing anybody can do to change that. The United States Constitution has set guidelines allowing for error in voting in a president who has not been found after the fact to be constitutionally qualified. Every voter has “standing” to question who is on their ballot and if every person on that ballot is qualified according to the laws of that state or the laws of the United States of America. For example: Blagojevich is not allowed to run for public office ever again in Illinois after being impeached in a vote of 114 to 1 by the Illinois State Senate. Obama and Nancy Pelosi trying to sneak this one in on everybody is a no-no. Let the merits of the case be heard from both sides. What does anybody have to fear? If Obama is United States Constitutionally qualified to hold that office it is not going to make one hair on my head grey. If he is not United States Constitutionally qualified to hold that office the United States Constitution makes provisions for that and I do believe that the office would be passed down to the second in command Joseph Biden. The democrats won you can’t change the election. Not everyone born on United States soil is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America. I will be back later with future commentary and let’s be cautiously optimistic. I must warn caution to everybody as this is a very trying time. Godspeed.
Jacqlyn Smith:
At the hearing yesterday at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said essentially one thing and one thing only:
Orly failed to properly serve the President so she doesn’t get her default judgment and the case is starting from scratch.
We all know the next steps:
1. Within 60 days, defendants move for a dismissal on standing.
2. Orly responds in opposition.
3. the case is dismissed.
Black Lion says:
July 13, 2009 at 10:29 am
“The question remains, what does placing advertisements have to do with the filing of a legal case?”
- $ -
bob strauss wrote:
An obots who was there, Politijab contributor ‘wavey davey’, tells it a little differet. Judge Carter did say, more than once, that he wants to get passed the service issue and get this to court on the merits. There was no motion to dismiss.
From the obot reporter: ‘Judge Carter repeatedly pointed out that he could dismiss for failure of service, but that the case could be re-filed and re-served and that would simply delay the ultimate hearing of the case — as Judge Carter put it, this could simply go back and forth, and then up through appeals, throughout the duration of Obama’s term of office. “Let’s get this to a hearing on the merits, we need to resolve all doubts.”‘
The “government lawyers” are opposing, not helping, Taitz. The one bit of assistance Carter ordered was to effect legitimate service on the United States. Taitz’s motion arguing that she had completed proper service and was now due default judgment was denied.
There’s more, but we’re off topic for the article and Krchner’s ad.
It is being reported, at citizen wells, Judge Carter to hold trial on the merits in Orly Taitz case she will have help from government lawyers, there will be no extensions.
Hear Ye…Hear Ye…news just came from a Patriot who talked to Dr. Taitz!!! Thank you Pamela for the information and congratulations Dr. Taitz….go all the way girlfriend!!! Jackie:)
“We the people are the rightful master of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” – Abraham Lincoln
——————————————————————————–
From: PAMELA BARNETT [mailto:pb_realestate@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:09 PM
To: pamela barnett
Subject: Great News! Obama eligibility will be heard on merits!!
Please distribute everywhere.
Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney who had a hearing today in court concerning BO qualifications!!!!
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.
This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.
Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.
Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
Respectfully,
CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired
I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING STATED WITH THE FILINGS OF THIS DOCUMENT AND ARGUEMENTS SET OUT . MORE TO COME TREVOR MERCHANT MONDAY JULY 13.2009 BRONX NEW YORK CITY
This imposter at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. is in for a rude awakening. His cohorts in crime are done. This imposter has no idea of how many holes “it” has in “it’s” official story. If he makes it to the 2012 election without impeachment “it” is going to have a lot of explaining to do regarding “itself” calling “itself” the messiah. “it” mocked God and so I mock “it” in front of my elected officials. Let me put it to you real simple. I am a Natural Born Citizen with all of my records open to the public. All I have to do is put myself on the presidential ballot in Louisiana and challenge this phony to come up with his documentation as I have already displayed mine. Lame. Weak. Has accomplished nothing.
Every person I have spoken to lately knows about Obama’s eligibility problem. Some think his father was born in Kenya, not him, but some know that Obama himself was born there. Why people aren’t more angry, I’m not sure, although some I’ve spoke to are angry.
In the grocery store or wherever, all I do is say, “Have you heard that Obama was born in Kenya?” and wait for an answer. Sometimes the person is misinformed, sometimes partially informed, but I always fill them in on what I know.
At this point Congress is guilty of treason, also, for failing to do anything about this. The longer it goes on, with Supreme Court appointments, judges, and “czars” being given positions that are unconstitutional, the harder it will be to undo. If Obama is not eligible to hold the office, let’s boot him out and get on with it.
I think the Apuzzo case makes some excellent points. It’s about Congress failing to do its job as they do every time there’s a presidential election. Why didn’t Dick Cheney call for any dissenters, as is outlined in the Constitution? Why did Nancy Pelosi obscure any remark Cheney might have uttered by her raucous clapping and shrieking?
Right now our government is being run a bunch of 60s hippy throwbacks who never grew up. They had the insane notion that the American people are completely stupid and wouldn’t pay attention to that pesky “natural born citizen” clause. Luckily there were enough of us paying attention to do something about it.
Obama is a selfish, narcissistic pretender who must be removed from office.
[...] This post was Twitted by markhendricks [...]
The question remains, what does placing advertisements have to do with the filing of a legal case? Are we attempting to influence the jury? How is advertising a legal strategy ? Just wondering…