Thank you for saying that an American natural born citizen cannot be governed by British Law.

Remember, that every Supreme Court case has consistention label that class of citizens, with two citizen parents and born on US soil a NBC, and never applied this label to any other category, though it has admitted that NBCs are a subset of native citizens, in the sense native citizens is used in Wong vs. Ark.

So Obama is not a NBC. Nor can anyone cite SCOTUS to establish such, with a consistent interpretation of the cases.

So the question about his being governed by British law at birth is pertinent, because he could not be governed by British law unless he was born under the jurisdiction of the British Crown or had at least one British subject parent. In either case he is not a NBC.

It is not us who have to prove that a dual citizen at birth is not a NBC. it is those who assert this unconstitutional fantasy…

You have claimed it so many times, you have never given one shread of documentation to prove it.

And don’t try the tiresome charades of pretending a NBC is a simple US citizen…words have meaning to rational folks, but I presume that when you get initiated in the Obama cult, you renounce that assertion first off…

Orly wrote the AG, Holder, asking him to file such a motion or grant a write for her to file. He never responded. I think she is in the procees to ask the court to grant her leave to file…

FYI – I just saw this.

GRAND JURY INDICTMENTS WILL BE HEARD BY CHIEF MAGISTRATE ROYCE LAMBERTH

Patriot’s Heart Network releases the following: Following Patriot’s Heart Network’s trip to Washington DC along with American Grand Jury representatives, Dr. Penny Kelso, Mack Ellis and Carl Swensson, Chalice reports the following: Patriot’s Heart Network contacted Chief Magistrate Judge Royce Lamberth’s office this morning. The following information was provided: 1) A case number will be assigned to the [...]

I’ve been getting a number of emails on this as well.

The bottom line is that the presentment is merely receiving a case number. There is nothing necessarily special about this, in that it merely recognizes the paperwork as being a part of what’s submitted to the Court. It does not necessarily mean that the presentment is actually going to be heard.

-Phil

Dr. Taitz is representing Dr. Keyes and a number of other plaintiffs, but I don’t think she filed a § 16-3503 petition. If you see a post on her site saying she did, please post a link.

GRAND JURY INDICTMENTS WILL BE HEARD BY CHIEF MAGISTRATE ROYCE LAMBERTH

Patriot’s Heart Network releases the following: Following Patriot’s Heart Network’s trip to Washington DC along with American Grand Jury representatives, Dr. Penny Kelso, Mack Ellis and Carl Swensson, Chalice reports the following: Patriot’s Heart Network contacted Chief Magistrate Judge Royce Lamberth’s office this morning. The following information was provided: 1) A case number will be assigned to the [...]

During the election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell the American people how a natural born citizen of the United States can be governed – at birth – by British law?

The problem with this “crafted with razor sharp precision so that slippery tongued vixens can’t slither out of the truth nexus without exposing themselves” question is that the answer is obvious:

It can’t.

The British Nationality Act of 1948 only “governs’ British citizenship status. As a sovereign nation they can give their citizenship to anybody they want. Even to people who don’t know it. Even to people who don’t want it.

It has no relevance to, impact or effect on American citizenship because, as we are also a sovereign nation, only our laws govern American citizenship status.

Hasn’t Orly Taitz done just that?

If you’ve read the letter, – … you might want to sign the petition and voice your comments. If you haven’t read the letter, – … you really might do well by clicking on the link above. Note: As of Monday, July 06, 2009, there are over 146,000 signings and comments. If you’d care to join hundreds of thousands of other citizens, click on the above link.

You’ll be given an opportunity to have or not have your name shown, – … as you choose. I don’t normally sign most on-line petitions. But, -… I did on this one! Here’s your chance to add your name and
comments to the others wanting honesty, truth and good government.

Further, from: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ …
Below is the question that must be asked of White House Press Secretary Gibbs should anyone ever have the chance again. It’s been crafted with razor sharp precision so that slippery tongued vixens can’t slither out of the truth nexus without exposing themselves to even the most sleepy of audiences.

Make this question your mantra. Don’t be distracted from it.

Why aren’t our members of Congress addressing and confirming with absolute certainty Obama’s citizenship – or the lack thereof? It should be demanded until answered. THIS IS WHAT THEY SHOULD ASK: During the election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell the American people how a natural born citizen of the United States can be governed – at birth – by British law?

It would help if all of us concentrated on Obama’s own admission, as verified on his website. He was NOT a natural born citizen.

Please pass this on to many others …

Please Donate:

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm

This lawsuit is still alive and well and HAS NOT been dismissed yet.

The defendents have filed a motion to dismiss.

Charle’s lawyer, Mario Apuzzo is filing a counter motion.

Charles welcomes legal advice to defeat the motion to dismiss.

He can forward it to Mario but ultimately it will be Mario with his legal expertise to decide if the any legal advice offered has merit and can worked in the counter motion.

Don’t forget about quo warranto in the D.C. Code. § 16-3501 of the D.C. Code says: “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.”

Judge Lamberth is the chief judge in the very court mentioned by the D.C. Code as the one to preside over the quo warranto. § 16-3502 of the code goes on: “The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.”

Of course, the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. have failed to bring quo warranto. § 16-3503 of the code says: “If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.”

So if there is someone out there who requested of either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. that a quo warranto be brought on THEIR (the person’s) behalf, and they didn’t do so (and of course, we know they didn’t), that person can now ask the court (over which Judge Lamberth presides) to institute quo warranto under § 16-3503 of the code. Though it would be wise to have an attorney handle the specifics; I’m thinking Leo Donofrio would be best.

So the question is, is there such a person out there who has documentation to prove that they made such a request to either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C.? And if not, perhaps someone should make that request now, and if the two relevant authorities refuse to act then the matter can be moved to a § 16-3503 request as aforementioned.