Eligibility Update: Connerat v. Obama Refiled; FL Realtor Readies Complaint (Docs Attached); Election Law Bills in Congress
Spencer Connerate, Plaintiff pro se in Connerat v. Obama, refiled his small claims case on July 1. According to the Pinellas County, FL docketing system, he is slated to go before the same Judge Myra S. McNary on July 28, 2009 at 2:00pm ET:
Uniform Case Pinellas Case Section Case Type Type 522009SC005522XXSCSC 09005522SC NPC NEGLIGENCE SC Style: CONNERAT WILLIAM SPENCER 111 vs. OBAMA BARACK HUSSEIN II Jury Trial STIP NOTH Reason Type Disp. Filling Date Appeal Date Judg. Date Reop Date Docket Date 07/01/09 Case/Cat OTHER NEGLIGENCE
7 Docket Entries, 07/02/09 to 07/01/09
Pages Date P/D Docket Entry Ver 07/02/09 CLERK NOTICE/STMT OF CLAIM-DEFT/VIA PLAINTIFF N 07/02/09 CLERK NOTICE TO PLTF/PLTF ATTY N 07/02/09 CLERK PRE-TRIAL HRG SET: 072809 02:00P HON MYRA S MCNARY F 07/01/09 PLAINTIFF SUMMONS FEE PAID $10.00 N 07/01/09 PLAINTIFF SMALL CLAIMS FILING FEE PAID $55.00 N 07/01/09 PLAINTIFF STATEMENT OF CLAIM F 07/01/09 PLAINTIFF THIS CASE ASSIGNED BY CLERK TO SECTION NPC BY 3777 – RANDOM SC N
NOTH Notice of Hearing STIP Stipulation Ver Verified: F=Filed, N=Not Filed/Notice. There is no
case file document associated with a notice.
The following is Mr. Connerat’s filed paperwork…
Per three comments posted on my site, a concerned citizen, Robert Quinn, had been in contact with Florida’s Secretary of State back on June 23, 2009, and promised to file a complaint against the Democratic National Committee and the Florida Democratic Party:
If just one large state requires the political parties to produce their candidates qualifing documents, the Obama Secrecy Loophole will be over. The following letter represents my efforts to get that done here Florida.
Mr. Quinn went on to point out some eligibility discrepancies with Florida’s election statutes, notably that the State does not require any form of substantiation outside of party nomination:
There is no Florida Statute that requires a presidential candidate to be anything other than nominated by his party. Only the nominating party has the authority and responsibility to verify constitutional eligibility.
DNC Rules, 2008 Convention, Presidential Preference, Page 14
K. 1. Based on the right of the Democratic Party to freely assemble and to determine the criteria for its candidates, it is determined that all candidates for the Democratic nomination for President or Vice President shall:
a. be registered to vote, and shall have been registered to vote in the last election for the office of President and Vice President; and
b. have demonstrated a commitment to the goals and objectives of the Democratic Party as determined by the National Chair and will participate in the Convention in good faith.
2. It is further determined that these requirements are in addition to the requirements set forth by the United States Constitution and any law of the United States.The DNC can and must be held accountable for their participation in this election fraud.
In his final commentary, Mr. Quinn notes that most cases of vetting a candidate’s eligibility must start at the State level and that processes must be put into place in order to hold such vetting to account:
I suppose the degree to which we can hold the various Secretary of States responsible depends upon each states election laws but someone in every state should join this effort and file an election fraud complaint against the DNC and state party with their State Attorney. Many of these players will be running for office next year.
Original letters:
In my non-attorney opinion, the biggest hurdle that Mr. Quinn would have to overcome with respect to Florida’s lack of process of vetting by the SoS would be one concerning the “doctrine of laches.” Essentially, assuming that he overcomes the hurdle of standing (i.e.: the right to petition the government on such a case as this), he would have to prove that it is not now past time to bring such a case. The concept could also be understood as a type of “statute of limitations,” in that unless he can effectively show that — via his correspondence with the SoS — he had been trying to rectify this situation in a reasonably timely manner, this could become a legitimate legal technicality outside of his favor.
While I do critique this kind of case — and welcome comments for and against, as always — I do wish both Messrs. Connerat and Quinn the best in their respective venues.
In related news, Ballot-Access.org informs us of the current status of election law bills that are currently pending in Congress:
Almost all of the interesting election law bills in the U.S. House have continued to add co-sponsors during June. In order of how many co-sponsors each bill has, here is a list:
1. Popular vote on Puerto Rico status: 151 (HR 2499)
2. Paper Trail for Vote-Counting Machines: 80 (HR 2894)
3. Public Funding for Congressional Candidates: 56 (HR 1826)
4. Express mail to be used for mailing overseas absentee ballots: 38 (HR2393)
5. Anti-Gerrymandering: 12 (HR 3025)
6. Requiring Presidential Candidates to Submit a Birth Certificate: 6 (HR 1503).The only interesting bill that has no co-sponsors is HR 665, to provide that D.C. voters should be treated as Maryland voters, for purposes of congressional elections. Representative Dana Rohrbacher (R-California) introduced it in February.
See the following links regarding the eligibility saga:
- Obama’s Presidential Eligibility: What You Need to Know
- Obama’s Sealed Background Documentation
- What’s the Difference Between a Birth Certification Versus a Birth Certificate?
- Obama Citizenship Facts
- The State Department and Sen. Patrick Leahy’s (D-VT) Natural Born Citizen Resolution (April 10, 2008)
- Citizen Grand Jury Updates and Eligibility Lawsuit Listing
-Phil
i understand that obama had to swear an oath of eligibility IAW FL Statute 99.021…as follows;
State of Florida
County of _____
Before me, an officer authorized to administer oaths, personally appeared (please print name as you wish it to appear on the ballot) , to me well known, who, being sworn, says that he or she is a candidate for the office of _____; that he or she is qualified under the Constitution and laws of the United States to hold the office to which he or she desires to be nominated or elected; and that he or she has qualified for no other public office in the state the term of which office or any part thereof runs concurrent with that of the office he or she seeks.
(Signature of candidate)
(Address)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _____ day of _____, (year) , at _____ County, Florida.
(Signature and title of officer administering oath)
(end quote)
if, in fact, Obama took this oath as required by Statute…and then confirmed that he was, in fact, a british citizen at the time of his birth…then he did, in fact, falsely swear this oath…
which is a 3rd degree felony
now, it comes to rise that obama, as a educator, whose specialty is constitutional law…would have full knowledge of this issue before us…and did swear this oath…with full knowledge…that it was not true…demonstrating a conspiracy to commit this act against the people of the State of Florida…
if it can be demonstrated that similar acts occured in several of the other 49 States, it is not unreasonable for Obama, his executives and directors of his election campain, and the component of the DNC that aided Obama in executing this scheme against the people of the United State, to be charged under the RICO act as organized criminal activity…relating to fraudulent practices, false pretenses, (and) fraud generally…
Dear Phil –
It is my view that Master Connerat’s point about Oath to Vote as law in Florida means that both of these ‘pencil-pushers’ already had a sworn duty to protect the Constitution of the United States. If they don’t check the eligibility, under Section II, how are they protecting our Constitution?!
This is Florida law, which they broke. Sec. Browning should have postponed the Meeting of Electors, upon Connerat’s written, hand-delivered Petition, which is copied here, for your readers. Interestingly, his “Armistice Day” 2008 letter appears, fetching no response yet, one must presume:
W. Spencer Connerat, III
13584 Feather Sound Cir., W.
Apt. 2009
Clearwater, FL 33762-5559
Telephone: (727) 556-0170
Petitioner, pro se
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
W. Spencer Connerat, III
Petitioner,
vs.
Florida Secretary of State Kurt S. Browning
Respondent. )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No.:
PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND STAY OF 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TO BE CONDUCTED IN FLORIDA SENATE CHAMBERS AT 2:00P.M. ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2008
Date:
Time:
Dept.:
Judge:
Filed:
Trial:
W. Spencer Connerat, III, resident of the State of Florida, registered voter of the State of Florida since March 17, 2003, and sworn upholder and defender of the Constitution of the State of Florida and of the Constitution of the United States of America,
PETITIONER, alleges in good faith, and under penalty of Law, a serious breech of Trust:
I
INTRODUCTION
Parties
1. W. SPENCER CONNERAT, III, Petitioner herein, is a registered voter in the State of Florida and a natural born citizen of the United States of America.
2. KURT S. BROWNING, Respondent herein, is the Secretary of State of the State of Florida;
Legal Basis
3. The Supreme Court of Florida has original jurisdiction in mandamus pursuant to Article Five (V), Section Three (III) of the Florida Constitution, and in Common Law, and shall exercise that jurisdiction in appropriate cases where the issue at hand is “certified by the Supreme Court of the United States or a United States Court of Appeals which is determinative of the cause and for which there is no controlling precedent of the supreme court of Florida.” Furthermore, the honourable Court “may issue writs of prohibition to courts and all writs necessary to complete exercise of its jurisdiction.” It is truly rare, and possibly without precedent in Florida, that the qualifications of a presidential candidate have been considered and properly vetted in jurisprudence. According to article two (II), section one (I) of the United States Constitution, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President” and, following the logic of our Founders, such burden of proof is incumbent on the candidate. To date, Barack Hussein Obama has not proven, to this Florida resident and registered voter, unaffiliated with any Party, that he is eligible to be elected (by the Florida Electors, who derive their power from the State Legislature) to the office of President of the United States. The issue of eligibility for the Presidency is an issue of great public importance to Florida, and moreover, to the Nation. Secretary of State Browning is about to certify Mr. Obama as the winner of the Florida 2008 presidential election, eligible based on the Constitution of
the United States, even though there is no proof of Mr. Obama’s eligibility, and there was no response given to a bona fide letter of inquiry, which was signed, sealed, and delivered via the United States Postal Service, numbered 7008 1830 0002 5644 7186, delivered at 11:16a.m., signed under the hand of Ernie Turner, and is incorporated into this petition as follows, not as evidence, but in order to guarantee standing as a citizen, who deserved a response to a simple request from one who purportedly seeks the highest office in the Land, to wit:
November 11, 2008
U.S.P.S. CERTIFIED MAIL
Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Senator Obama:
Congratulations on your garnering of over fifty percent of the popular vote in the recent election for President. I watched your speech (it was midnight, here in the East) and I applaud you for the hope, inspiration, and kindness you have given to many folks. Nonetheless, as a U.S. citizen, who did vote in the election, albeit for the Republican nominee, I am concerned about your qualifications to be elected President of the United States of America. Therefore, please return to me, forthwith, proof of your “natural born” status as required under our Constitution.
I respectfully ask for a written response to be in my hand before December 1, 2008. Otherwise, I may seek to enjoin the Electoral College vote. My feeling is that you truly believe in concepts like fairness, and “fair play.” Humour this Citizen and remove any doubt.
The State of Hawaii is also being summoned. If a “tangible interest” is not this case, of a citizen ensuring that the Constitution is upheld, then there is no such concept under Law. It is in our collective best interests that you produce the sought document, without burdening the Court.
Looking forward to your prompt response, I remain,
In patriotism,
________________________________
William Spencer Connerat 111 – citizen
13584 Feather Sound Circle, W.
Apt. 2009
Clearwater, FL 33762-5559
cc) Mr. Thomas J. Donnelly, Esq.
Senator John Sidney McCain III
4. There are several cases pending throughout the United States of America related to this enforcement of qualifications. Petitioner has evidence to introduce, at trial, showing valuable consideration tendered to the State of Hawaii, pursuant to a prompt resolution of this matter without burdening the Court. However, this petition is not the forum for such details. In the essence of brevity, the crux of the legal matter is as follows: “It is meet and right for the State of Florida to certify Electoral Votes for a candidate about whom there is serious and material doubt as to eligibility?”
5. Mr. Obama has failed to demonstrate that he is a natural born citizen in any of the myriad
cases filed and still pending outside of the State of Florida. According to the stipulated facts of various websites, including one such site directly linked to the website of Mr. Obama, at the time of his birth, Mr. Obama’s father was a foreign subject, a citizen of British Protective Territory of East Africa (currently Kenya) and therefore, having been born with split and competing loyalties, candidate Obama cannot be considered natural born. Furthermore, no citizen whose status is subject to an Act of Congress (in this case, the Immigration statutes pertaining to dual citizenship) is syllogistically able to be commensurately natural born. The aforementioned challenges, including at least one currently docketed at the Supreme Count of the United States serve to demonstrate, prima facie, that reasonable doubt exists as to the eligibility of the Democratic Party’s nominee for President.
6. Secretary of State Browning is responsible for ensuring the validity of the State election process by, among other things, organizing and co-ordinating the Meeting of Florida Electors, which is to take place in the Florida Senate Chambers, on December 15, 2008, at 2:00p.m.
7. The office of Secretary of State is intended to function without bias and to provide the critical sense of fairness and impartiality necessary for the people to have confidence in the fundamental underpinnings of the democratic process for our elections.
8. There is a reasonable and common expectation by Florida voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process. Heretofore, to Petitioner’s knowledge, after much due diligence, there has been no verification of Mr. Obama’s qualifications, other than attestations. This practice represents a much lower standard than that demanded of one when requesting a Florida driver’s license or even a glass of beer at Tropicana Field. Since the Florida Secretary of State has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring the defendant from certifying the Florida Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States of America is received by Petitioner and duly conveyed to the
Secretary forthwith. This proof could include items such as Mr. Obama’s original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the various and sundry governments in whose country the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and natural born qualification for President.
18. In the case of individuals seeking the Office of the President of the United States, the United States Constitution provides for a system of Electors, wherein citizens of the respective states have a state-controlled election in which Electors representing the interests of the respective candidates for President on the ballots of the Several States, are elected to represent the interests of the respective states in the Electoral College. Thus, there is no federal ballot controlled by the federal government. There is a ballot for each Florida county, including Pinellas, whereby voters choose a “slate of Electors” who, in turn, represent the named candidate for said office on the ballot. In such method, the Secretary of State has the onerous task of not only certifying the count of the ballots cast, but also the propriety of the contents of the ballots cast. If Mr. Obama cannot present proper documentation verifying his natural born status, he cannot be elected President, and Secretary of State Browning has a duty to bar the casting of votes by Florida Electors in support of an unqualified candidate.
19. To avert a national constitutional crisis which may accrue after the election through laborious legal challenges, this writ seeks to resolve such complaints. It is incumbent upon Mr. Obama to answer the aforementioned respectfully submitted letter of inquiry signed by this Petitioner, accepted by the United States Postal Service, as Certified Mail, duly delivered, with signed receipt, and ignored.
20. Should Mr. Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioner, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that an usurper will be sitting as the President of the
United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.
The State of Florida will be tantamount to a Republic, or a State from which there is no Union to secede.
21. United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 8 provides, “The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.” This federal statute confers upon each Elector an affirmative and forthright duty to ensure that any candidate for President or Vice-President is qualified, thus natural born. Otherwise, the Elector may be casting a vote in a manner which is contrary to the direction of the Constitution, and contrary to the common understanding of a Florida voter.
22. Given PETITIONER’s sworn duty as a registered Florida voter, and given his cause via posse comitatus as a natural born citizen of the United States, he has ample standing to bring this Writ before this honourable Court.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully prays:
23. That the Court issue an extraordinary writ of Mandamus under Article five (V), Section Three (III) of the Florida Constitution in conjunction with a writ of Prohibition (a stay) of the Meeting of Florida Electors until such documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States, and therefore eligible to be Elected to the office of President of the United States by the Electors of the Great State of Florida, whose motto is one and the same as the Union: IN GOD WE TRUST.
24. For fees related to this case incurred by Petitioner, including reasonable pro se costs, as well as additional costs should Counsel be retained.
25. For liquidated damages, and for such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true, to the best of my knowledge. I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are wilfully false, or if not made in good faith, I am subject to punishment.
Respectfully submitted (via FedEx) on December 11, 2008.
_______________________________________
W. Spencer Connerat, III
The Supreme Court dismissed the mandamus prayer, without prejudice.
Best,
Joe (not the Acting President, but part of the Revolutionary Army)
New England Patriot (and true to your name),
Why is it that the Home Lands Dept of Hawaii just changed their rules to bolster the value of a COLB, a move obvious to support Zero’s supporters, and FL won’t do the same contrariwise to protect its elections?
Are not both states ruled by Republican govs?
What gives…(sarcasm)!
It would seem to me that the attorney general of Florida needs to amend the rule as Mr. Quinn has requested. It certainly wouldn’t remove Obama from office, so all of these frauds can have their fraudulent president a while longer (but not much longer!). I think Mr. Quinn’s letter is logical, well-written and valid, no matter when it was written.
Why wouldn’t the attorney general be willing to change the rule so that this fiasco never happens again? They say the 2000 election was bad, but BO has made this one a nightmare from which we still haven’t awakened.
Civis naturaliter natus – Thank you for your comment, I value it greatly. In Florida our SoS is appointed by and reports to Governor Crist who is running for the US Senate in next years elections. Our Attorney General is running for Governor. Both will have opposition in the primary election. I will do my best to make this an issue if they fail to act.
DJ,
My opinion is that it is highly suspect, to say the least.
-Phil
Since there is nothing lost or risked by promulgating such a non disqualifying rule, their failure to do so will show complete dereliction of duty to guard the elections in the State of Florida.
Prepare your recall papers, they both need to be ousted if they fail to act…
It may be this is not the first time in History that we have a Usurper.
It is very likely, we won the battle, but Germany and the international bankers may have really one the war. According to some, George Bush (41st) may very well have been planted by the NAzi’s. And his real name ain’t originally Bush. Likewise, the Bushes and the plant may very well be the worst of scum!(I voted for them too!-guess that makes me scum–Now that I now, I ask for forgiveness please! No telling “Who is McCain, and the rest of the Damn bunch”). I now believe they don’t have our interest at heart.
Did the Nazi’s plant Bush(41st)? Go to this link:
http://www.conspiracyresearch.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=24075
Maybe Phil can help us verify the validity of this article.
I can tell you this for myself, it brings to light on why the Bushes have done things that I never expected them to do. And, now I understand what Bush(41st) meant when he referenced the “New World Order.” I thought he meant lets get along better with all the people in the world since we are doing more and more business and trading together. No, Stupid!!! He MEANT, “THE NEW WORLD ORDER(NWO)”!!!
THEY’RE ALL IN ON IT, PERIOD! He’s no Texan. They’re all scum deceiving the common good hearted Americans that they are looking out for their constituents. Nope! They’re doing it for benefit of their NWO PLAN….and their own self-serving plans and interests!!!
Do you know the Statue of Limitations for Florida and Texas?
Charles Kerchner from http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ needs financial help.
Please Donate:
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm
This lawsuit is still alive and well and HAS NOT been dismissed yet.
The defendents have filed a motion to dismiss.
Charle’s lawyer, Mario Apuzzo is filing a counter motion.
Charles welcomes legal advice to defeat the motion to dismiss.
rlqretired – Robert Quinn,
Thanks. Updated.
-Phil
Phil – Thanks for the publication but one point of clarification. My Election Fraud complaint against the DNC and the Florida Democratic Party is to be filed with the Attorney General of the State of Florida, not in the courts as a legal action. The extent to which Governor Crist and Secretary Browning will be involved in this collusion will depend upon whether they promulgate the suggested corrective primary rule for which they already have full authority and the responsibility to do.
Browning is the lap dog of Charlie Crist.
Wasn’t the Gov. on his ‘honeymoon’ when the Electoral votes were cast?!
I hope nobody in Florida supports either of there poseurs.