Eligibility Update: US Attorney Taylor Resigns, Another Grand Jury Indictment, GA Voter Case Headed to SCOTUS
Leo Donofrio, attorney and Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, posted an article today encouraging those who would have otherwise sent letters to US Attorney Jeffrey Taylor to investigate eligibility that they might be better served to contact Patrick Fitzgerald instead:
On May 28, Jeffrey Taylor resigned as acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia. I have not heard from one person who got a response from him regarding their quo warranto letters.
I did hear from one person who had proof that their QW letter to Taylor had been rerouted to the White House.
There is much speculation as to why Taylor resigned. I think it’s interesting to note that while he didn’t file a quo warranto regarding Obama’s eligibility, he also never told anyone who wrote to him that Obama was actually eligible and that Obama had been properly vetted which was the canned response from all of Congress.
Taylor never made such a statement.
It will be interesting to see now whether his successor in the DC US Attorney’s office – Channing Phillips – will issue a statement saying Obama is eligible.
Was Taylor pressured to resign because he wouldn’t vouch for Obama? I don’t know. But I do know Taylor didn’t have the support of enough US citizens. So America gets what America deserves – the destruction of its Constitution because the great majority of US citizens don’t care about their Constitution.
My suggestion to anybody who does care is to send your quo warranto letters to US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. Perhaps since the DC Code statute is vague in its wording – only requiring “the US Attorney” to file for the quo warranto – it could be used by any US Attorney. That is not my original interpretation, but after seeing this fiasco play out, and listening to the lame excuses favoring Obama’s eligibility, I don’t see why any US Attorney couldn’t use the statute. The statute just says “the US Attorney”.
I think Patrick Fitzgerald is your best bet now. At least you’ll probably get a response from his office.
Bob Campbell, editor of AmericanGrandJury.org, created another posting regarding more activity with the citizen grand jury initiative…
Status: ONLINE and State Grand Juries:
April 29th concluded, Indictment handed down
May 9th concluded, Indictment handed downMay 16h concluded, Indictment handed down
May 23rd concluded, Indictment handed down
May 30th concluded, Indictment handed down
Lone Star State GJ Texas concluded, Indictment handed down
Arkansas State GJ concluded, Indictment handed down
Upcoming June schedule:
June 6th, scheduled and approved
Tennesee Grand Jury, registered, a couple of openings, almost ready to go
June 13th, scheduled and approved
Illinois State Grand Jury, registered, a couple of openings, almost ready to go
June SUPER Grand Jury, HUGE — details private at this time — completely registered and filledIt looks like AKA is having problems with his public announcement system again. In an attempt to quell the rising tide of anger and disgust from citizens wanting to know where’s the proof of Obama’s “natural born” citizenship, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs’ recent response to a question on the President’s birth certificate tried to laugh it off. Well, it is no laughing matter and now a FoxNews discussion is having a field day with the comments section. It looks like AKA is getting closer and closer to pucker time!
The RightSideofLife has the full story here. The details include responses from Dr. Ron Polarik and Attorney Mario Apuzzo. This article covers most of the well known facts and details surrounding the alleged guilt of Barack Obama.
We at American Grand Jury hear what the people are saying and have charged Obama with “presentments” of guilt. On Satruday, May 30th at 2:30 pm, the convened Grand Jury handed down the YES votes of 31 members, unanimous, to INDICT Barack Obama with the “presentments” of Fraud and Treason.
The May 30th voting has been formally attested to and verified. The “presentments” will be reduced to writing within the next few days for distribution to the court system throughout the land. To date, American Grand Jury has sponsored approximately 70 serves on different courts, sheriffs, Districk Attoneys, Attorney Generals, judges and other officials around the United States. The word is spreading that we mean business and are not going to stop with these presentments until the Court system does their job of formally prosecuting Obama.
The people of the United States have the right to know who this man really is that is living in the White House. Right now it looks like AKA is a Foreign National “play-acting” as the Commander-in-Chief and President. Obama contiunes to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars with legal firms to hide his birth certificate, passport records, school records, selective service records, campaign contribution records and God knows what else.
You know what they say, “the bigger they are, the harder they fall.”
Thanks for stopping by,
Bob Campbell
American Grand Jury [emphases original]
And from my home State of Georgia, The Wall Street Journal reports that the Justice Department has rejected a duly-signed State law requiring prospective voters to prove that they are citizens (excerpted):
In a letter released on Monday, the Justice Department said the state’s voter-verification program is frequently inaccurate and has a “discriminatory effect” on minority voters in Georgia.
“This flawed system frequently subjects a disproportionate number of African-American, Asian and/or Hispanic voters to additional, and more importantly, erroneous burdens on the right to register to vote,” said Loretta King, acting assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s civil-rights division. Ms. King’s letter was sent to Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker on Friday.
The decision means Georgia must halt the voter-verification checks, although the state can still ask the Justice Department to reconsider, according to the letter and to the Georgia secretary of state’s office.
Secretary of State Karen Handel on Monday blasted the DOJ’s decision, saying it opens the floodgates for noncitizens to vote in the state.
“Clearly, politics took priority over common sense and good public policy,” said Ms. Handel, a Republican candidate for governor in 2010.
At issue is a system that had been used by Georgia elections officials to verify the identities and citizenship of newly registering voters by matching their applications with driver’s license and Social Security data. …
A three-judge federal panel last October ordered the state to seek Justice Department preclearance for the checks under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Georgia is one of several states that need federal approval before changing election rules because of a history of discriminatory Jim Crow-era voting practices.
The Justice Department decision marks the first time the new Democratic Obama administration has weighed in on Georgia’s election laws. It is the first time the Justice Department has rejected a change in election procedures by Georgia since the 1990s, according to a spokesman for the Georgia attorney general. …
Georgia is still awaiting word on whether a new law that requires newly registering voters to show proof of citizenship will pass muster with the DOJ.
Ballot-Access.org reports that this case will be subject to Supreme Court Conference this Thursday:
Here is the rebuttal brief of the NAACP (in the U.S. Supreme Court) in NAACP v Billups, 08-1231. The issue is the constitutionality of Georgia’s law requiring voters at the polls to show a goverment photo-ID card. This current round of briefs is to determine whether the Supreme Court will hear the case. Especially interesting is footnote 1, comparing the Georgia ID law with the Indiana ID law.
The Supreme Court will consider whether to hear this case at its June 4 conference.
A current listing of citizen grand jury updates and eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
-Phil
earl,
Based on what?
-Phil
Frances:
What rumors have you heard about Taylor and where have you heard them?
June 4, 2009 at 9:10 am
Phil says:
“It’s basically a signature from the candidate.”
I would submit that your findings and those of yourfellowcitizen don’t support that conclusion at all. And yourfellowcitizen.com appears to have accepted the outcome of the election and inauguration and moved on. Interestingly, he posted the documents whereby Pres Obama was certified by the DNC as legally qualified to serve under the US Constitution. The burden is still on you and those who would challenge Obama to prove he’s not.
http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/2008/12/hawaii-answers-two-of-my-questions.html
It is no possible for all 50 states, DC, 6 territories, the DNC, the RNC, the Bush Administration, the Clinton campaign, the McCain campaign, the Edwards campaign, the FEC, the CIA, the FBI, the entire United States Congress, the entire Electoral College, the National Archives to all have been mistaken about Obama’s eligibility, or “covering up”.
http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html
Born identity
Birth certificate styles adjust to fit times and regulations
By June Watanabe
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jun 06, 2009
(Single Page View) | Return to Paginated View
Question: What is the state’s policy for issuing a “Certification of Live Birth” versus a “Certificate of Live Birth”? My first, second and fourth children received certificates, but my third and fifth children received certifications. Why the difference? The certificate contains more information, such as the name of hospital, certifier’s name and title; attendant’s name and title, etc. The certification has only the child’s name, date and time of birth, sex, city/island/county of birth, mother’s maiden name, mother’s race, father’s name and father’s race. Why doesn’t the state just issue certificates? When did it stop issuing certificates? Is it possible to obtain certificates for my third and fifth children?
Answer: No, you can’t obtain a “certificate of live birth” anymore.
The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo.
The department only issues “certifications” of live births, and that is the “official birth certificate” issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.
And, it’s only available in electronic form.
Okubo explained that the Health Department went paperless in 2001.
“At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting,” she said.
Information about births is transferred electronically from hospitals to the department.
“The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests,” Okubo said.
Asked for more information about the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health Department “does not have a short-form or long-form certificate.”
“The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.
Okubo also emphasized the certification form “contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate.”
She added that the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state’s current certification of live birth “as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.”
The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii birth certificate received national attention during last year’s presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama’s American citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his campaign Web site a fake.
Asked about that document, Okubo said, “This is the same certified copy everyone receives when they request a birth certificate.”
We found a discussion of “the truth about Obama’s birth certificate” on the Web site FactCheck.org — http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html.
The organization describes itself as “a nonpartisan, nonprofit ‘consumer advocate’ for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.”
It says a “certification of live birth” is, in fact, a short-form official birth certificate. Information included in the document might differ from state to state.
Write to “Kokua Line” at Honolulu Star-Bulletin, 7 Waterfront Plaza, Suite 210, 500 Ala Moana, Honolulu 96813; call 529-4773; fax 529-4750; or e-mail kokualine@starbulletin.com.
you said: ” The word is spreading that we mean business and are not going to stop with these presentments until the Court system does their job of formally prosecuting Obama.”
Well, i’ve been digging holes in my yard. And I’m not going to stop until these indictments stop.
Both of our methods are having the same effect.
Why does Obama continue to refuse to provide his BC. Not the phony and forged COLB he provided. I heard US Attny Taylor is not over yet. Anyone heard anything more? Does Taylor know something?
earl,
To whom you are asking this question notwithstanding, as I’ve already shared with you, it is reasonably well known from research at yourfellowcitizen.com and my site what constitutes the process of getting a candidate on the ballot. However, that, per se, is not the real issue; the real issue is what the SOSs and political parties require for eligibility substantiation, and as I’ve previously shared, it’s basically a signature from the candidate.
-Phil
joe says:
June 3, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Oh I don’t know Earl, does Barrack Obama ring a bell?
Of course, but Barack Obama is eligible to be President. So you have no knowledge of the procedure for being placed on the ballot in 50 states, DC and 6 territories. You just don’t think Obama is eligible. Consider this, in order for that to be true, 50 states, DC, 6 territories, the DNC, the RNC, the Bush Administration, the Clinton campaign, the McCain campaign, the Edwards campaign, the FEC, the CIA, the FBI, the United States Congress, the Electoral College, the National Archives were all mistaken about Obama’s eligibility, but you, joe, are not. It defies logic.
Oh I don’t know Earl, does Barrack Obama ring a bell?
joe says:
June 2, 2009 at 3:44 am
“I don’t understand why the Secretary of State of GA, Karen Handel, would be so upset that a law requiring prospective voters to prove that they are citizens was turned down by the DOJ, when the people on the ballot in her state don’t have to show their qualifications.”
How do you know they don’t?
DNC foisted a fraud on the American people:
Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen. Father was not a citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA.
RNC foisted a fraud on the American people:
McCain is not a Natural Born Citizen. Born in civilian hospital Colon Panama which was not in the Canal Zone.
RNC is posturing to foist another non-natural born citizen for President and fraud on the American people.
Gov Jindall of LA is not a Natural Born Citizen. Born in USA but both parents were not citizens of the USA when he was born.
Natural Born Citizenship defined:
http://www.thebirthers.org/OPED/NatrualBornCitizenshipDefined.pdf
http://www.thebirthers.org/
Party politics are now trumping the Constitution. George Washington warned about this. Now we are seeing it. The Parties put their power above all, even the Constitution. Congress is controlled by the party leadership and they are now in CYA mode for the fraud both parties pulled on the American people in the 2008 presidential election.
RJ
John Galt, I am with you. People fail to see the absolute criminality, of this usurper’s administration. This is deep! Many oath takers are failing to do their duty, and have left the citizens defenseless, and at the mercy of an usurper from Kenya for President.
This is more evidence that Hussein has turned America into a racial war zone.
The Blacks now have the power from Hussein down to Holder etc.
They are trying to add the Hispanics to their power base.
South African apartheid has come to America with the minority Statists contolling the majority with the help of the MSM.
Folks now they have the power, they won’t give it up easily.
Hussein is also attempting to add his fellow Muslims from all over the world to his power base.
I for one have long since had enough of this garbage. The usurping of power in America led by an illegal alien Marxist Indonesian Muslim.
Is Leo two for two? The US Attorney for DC office will be interesting to watch.
Pure Speculation:
One News Report:
from http://www.ticklethewire.com/2009/05/29/press-spokesman-channing-phillips-named-interm-dc-us-attorney-2/ and official press release link on this page:
Emphasis mine.
It might be a good idea to alert all of these interested parties concerning the eligibility issue.
I don’t understand why the Secretary of State of GA, Karen Handel, would be so upset that a law requiring prospective voters to prove that they are citizens was turned down by the DOJ, when the people on the ballot in her state don’t have to show their qualifications.
Perhaps someone should give her a presentment.
Doesn’t the D.C. Code statute have a progression whereby an average citizen and/or interested party can request quo warranto if the A.G. or U.S. Attorney won’t do it?
http://www.ofbyfor.us.com/page18/page18.html
http://www.ofbyfor.us.com/page21/page21.html
OfByFor.US.com has sent Kay Granger, US House, Texas, Denny Rehberg, US House, Montana, and Jerry Lewis, US House, California, Official rolls of Usurper in Chief Certification of Live Birth Toilet Paper.
Help OfByFor.US.com send UIC COLB TP to the Republican Members of the Committee on Appropriations, starting with the following Subcommittee:
Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs
* Kay Granger (TX)
* Mark Steven Kirk (IL)
* Ander Crenshaw (FL)
* Dennis R. Rehberg (MT)
* Jerry Lewis (CA), Ex Officio
Committee on Appropriations Republican Members
* Jerry Lewis, California, Ranking Member
* C.W. Bill Young, Florida
* Harold Rogers, Kentucky
* Frank R. Wolf, Virginia
* Jack Kingston, Georgia
* Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, New Jersey
* Todd Tiahrt, Kansas
* Zach Wamp, Tennessee
* Tom Latham, Iowa
* Robert B.Aderholt, Alabama
* Jo Ann Emerson, Missouri
* Kay Granger, Texas
* Michael K. Simpson, Idaho
* John Abney Culberson, Texas
* Mark Steven Kirk, Illinois
* Ander Crenshaw, Florida
* Dennis R. Rehberg, Montana
* John R. Carter, Texas
* Rodney Alexander, Louisiana
* Ken Calvert, California
* Jo Bonner, Alabama
* Steven C. LaTourette, Ohio
* Tom Cole, Oklahoma
http://www.ofbyfor.us.com/page8/page8.html
Quo Warranto “or otherwise”
The following is the legal authority by which any member of The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, or Subcommittees thereof, not only has the authority, but also has the Constitutional duty to determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is “eligible to the office of President”.
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states, “No person except a natural born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President”.
Article VI of the Constitution states, “The Senators and Representatives …shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support [DEFEND] this Constitution”.
Hence, under Article VI of the Constitution, each and every US Senator and Representative has the duty “to support [DEFEND]” the Constitution of the United States.
Synonyms for “support” include the following: defend, uphold, stand up for, speak up for, advocate, hold up, reinforce, prop up, maintain, shore up, keep up, buoy, buttress, brace, stay, sustain, provide for, keep, sustain, take care of, look after, care for, fend for, maintain, subsidize, underwrite, back up, encourage, help, assist, aid, be there for, sponsor, succor, comfort, carry, cheer on, back, follow, adopt, be in favor of, champion, espouse, favor, verify, corroborate, bear witness, prove, bear out, strengthen, authenticate, substantiate, uphold, endorse, confirm, bolster, make good, establish, vouch for, warrant, ratify, validate…
Antonyms of “support” include the following: weaken, neglect, abandon, oppose, deny…
If Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States, he is NOT “eligible to the office of President” and is a usurper of “the office of President”. If Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States, the Constitution of the United States is “opposed, denied, and weakened”.
The U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, COMMITTEE RULES, Section 1 (a) (1) and (2) states the following: “the Committee and each of its subcommittees is authorized: to hold such hearings as it deems necessary; and To require by subpoena or otherwise…the production of…documents as it deems necessary”.
The U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, COMMITTEE RULES, Section 2 (b) states the following: “Each subcommittee is authorized to meet, hold hearings, receive evidence, and report to the Committee all matters referred to it.”
Thus, any Subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, such as the Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, unequivocally has the authority to “receive evidence”, and “to require”“by subpoena or otherwise” “the production of…documents as it deems necessary” to determine the truth regarding “all matters referred to it”, such as whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, “natural born citizen” of the United States.
Whether or not Barack Hussein Obama, is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, “natural born citizen” of the United States, determines whether or NOT Barack Hussein Obama, is “eligible to the office of President”.
This is unequivocally an issue, or “matter”, that Article VI of the United States Constitution has “referred to” each and every U.S. Senator and Representative.
Article VI of the Constitution states, “The Senators and Representatives …shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support [DEFEND] this Constitution”.
Hence, under Article VI of the Constitution, each and every US Senator and Representative has the duty to determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, “natural born citizen” of the United States.
Thus, the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, or any Subcommittee thereof, such as the Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, has the authority “to require”, “by subpoena or otherwise”, “documents as it deems necessary” to determine whether or not Obama is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, such as any and all passports, birth certificates, Occidental College records, etc,…
The phrase “or otherwise” is not defined in the Committee Rules. Thus, the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Appropriations, or any Subcommittee thereof, has broad authority and means by which it can “receive evidence”, such as any and all “documents as it deems necessary” to determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama, is an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, “natural born citizen” of the United States, such as being “the interested party” in a Quo Warranto action, either as “the third person” “relator” under § 16-3502 in an action brought by the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, or in a direct action as “the interested person” in § 16-3503.
Please note that an “or otherwise” action under the District of Columbia Quo Warranto Statute would not involve the issuance of a “subpoena”. Hence, Barack Hussein Obama would not be able to challenge the “or otherwise” action under a feigned duty to defend the “separation of powers”.
Please also note that Barack Hussein Obama has taken the following oath as was required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 of the Constitution of the United States: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
If Barack Hussein Obama refuses to comply with the “writ of Quo Warranto” he is in open opposition to the Constitution of United States, and is thus adhering to the Enemies of the United States..
If and when the “writ of Quo Warranto” is issued, Barack Hussein Obama will have a choice to comply with the “writ of Quo Warranto”, “or otherwise” be tried for Treason for adhering to the Enemies of the United States.
Put the pressure on Channing Phillips. Let’s hope he doesn’t decide to resign when going gets tough.