Rhode Island, North Carolina and Media Take First Glance at Citizen Grand Jury Movement
According to a recent posting on retired Navy Officer Walter Fitzpatrick’s site — the same gentleman who filed a criminal complaint against the President concerning allegations of treason — a concerned citizen and common law grand jury member Michael Mandeville has officially begun the process of convening a grand jury as witnessed by representatives of the great State of Rhode Island:
Rhode Island Massachussettes Connecticut are on the map regarding the Grand Jury. I, Michael Mandeville, presented to our jury as witnessed by state government representatives the evidence in the case now under inspection. I also assisted folks from Massachusetts and Connecticut explaining to them how to form a Grand Jury. I’m meeting with them tomorrow night to get ‘em rolling. RI is now in session and on the court calendar.
I filed a motion with the clerk of Providence plantation to be sworn again under oath. My motion was done to erase doubt, avoid loop holes, and make the filing public.
Now I’m going kick butt! Walter Fitzpatrick , if your here and see this! I will fight to the end and make your statement unavoidable so help me God! Grand Jury Foreman of Rhode Island, Mike Mandeville of knmfarms http://rhodeislandpatriotsforamerica.ning.com/ Serving under col. Harry Rilley for his and all our fight! GOD BLESS US ALL!
Boots on the ground!
Citizen Wells is also reporting on his blog that The Observer News Enterprise in Newton, North Carolina has allegedly requested information regarding the recent citizen grand jury indictments:
“Believe it or not, I just received an e-mail from the editor of the Observer News Enterprise in Newton, NC, requesting that I answer a number of questions about my recent filing of the Obama indictment with Catawba County. (letter on request) Here is my response in the form of a Letter To The Editor:”
“As many know, there is quite a controversy concerning Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. This controversy has spread to other nations and America’s credibility is now at stake among foreign governments.
On May 13, 2009, I filed, with the Catawba County Clerk of Court’s office, an indictment of Barack Hussein Obama for the commission of fraud and treason. This indictment was handed down, on May 9, by a Citizen’s Grand Jury composed of jurors located in various states of the United States. All laws governing Grand Juries were complied with. The indictment was filed locally because it is the duty of any and all district attorneys to act on criminal charges… and I live here. As I understand it, the indictment has been filed in other states in addition to North Carolina.
It is the hopes and expectations of the Grand Jury, and others, that District Attorney James C. Gaither will honor his Oath of Office and investigate these accusations. If he will do so, it will require his bringing this case before a judge. Once that is done, the judge will grant discovery. “Discovery” is a term used to require that both sides put their cards on the table. This is to avoid “trial by ambush”. Once Mr. Obama is forced to submit his actual birth certificate, his school records, his college records and his immigration records, (which he has spent approximately one million dollars in concealing) the controversy will be settled. He will either continue to be president or he will be removed from office.
This is not about Barack Obama. It is about our Constitution which states, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President…”
Mr. Obama has not satisfied this question. It is now up to the courts to decide.”“I also included the info below:”
“FYI
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.What this executive order says, is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not. (See Section 3)
In other words, you aren’t going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn’t want you to see.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Obama’s first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints — none! There is no Obama documentation — no bona fides — no paper trail — nothing.
Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released
Certificate of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro adoption records — Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records — Not released
Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
Occidental College records — Not released
Passport — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia thesis — Not released
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles — None
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not released
Illinois State Senate records — None
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
Law practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None”
The indictment in question concerns the official filings of the North Carolina citizen grand jury as also reported by Citizen Wells. Here are the submissions:
“On May 9, 2009, the American Grand Jury met and, after reviewing the evidence presented, indicted Barak Obama, aka Barry Soetoro for fraud and treason. Wednesday, May 13, 2009, the indictment was filed with the Clerk of Court, Catawba County, NC (file #09R81) and a copy of the indictment was sent by Certified Mail to District Attorney James C. Gaither (NC District 25B), for further action according to his Oath of Office.”
Update: Mr. Fitzpatrick recently posted, “How to file an indictment, presentment, or criminal complaint:”
MR. ROBERT HEFNER WRITES:
If anyone is afraid to file a presentment, let me dispel their fears with an account of how I did it.
Upon entering the county courthouse I had to go through a metal detector to assure the deputy sheriff on guard that I was not carrying a pocketknife. I passed with flying colors. If he had only known what was in my file folder…..
On entering the Clerk of Court’s office, I was greeted by one of the employees and asked if she could help me. I handed her the presentment and told her that I would like to file it and receive a file number and receipt. She looked at the presentment and got a funny look on her face, then took it to a superior (that “funny look” was priceless). She returned within a minute and told me that it was a Federal concern.
I asked, “Fraud is no longer a crime in this state?”. She said someone else would have to help me and headed toward the “big office.”
In a few minutes, she was back (without the presentment) and asked me to take a seat.
Ten minutes later, the head clerk came out of her office with a yellow form, handed it to me, wrote the file number on my copy and directed me to the cashier. I paid the “copying fee” of $8.25 and headed for Rite Aid drug store to use their copying machine.
Nothing to it!
I made a copy of the presentment with the file number, put the original in a manila envelope and mailed it to the District Attorney via “Certified Mail, Receipt Requested”.
Mission accomplished!
Now news of the indictment is all over the ‘net. How embarrassing for our non-president.
A current listing of citizen grand jury updates and eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
-Phil
Not being a lawyer, this is a matter of simple common sense. If he has nothing to hide, why not produce the long form. His avoidance and expenditures to kept his records sealed surely indicates something is amiss. The media avoids this issue because he is their god and supports their liberal views.
There is enough evidence presented to cause any one of a simpe degree of intelligence to question “Mr. Transparency’s” avoidance of the issue.
Hypocrisy masked is the greatest tool of the liberal.
God Help ths Nation
Why are you arguing with someone who does not seem to want to do anything other than try to WIN an arguement? I do not see someone who is really concerned about our country’s plight, just picking a fight like some kid.
[...] Our friend Phil over at the Right Side of Life just did a wonderful front-page story on this. Please visit and read the details more fully. [...]
Phil wrote:
The “grandfather clause”, like the rest of the paragraph on presidential eligibility, makes no reference to any other nation’s laws, so my explanation is that you are just making stuff up, yet again.
brygenon,
Then please explain the “grandfather clause” in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. Obviously, some law outside of US law had and has some bearing on American citizens, else the founding fathers wouldn’t have put in specific restrictions on the presidency.
In other words, I already very clearly know you don’t think that foreign law has any bearing on American citizens (as you’ve pointed out, we’ve been down this thread at least once). I want to know why you think that way.
-Phil
Phil wrote:
“Britain’s citizenship policies are of no significance to how the United States rules itself,” was my response.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6043
brygenon,
If you wish to continue freely commenting on my site, then I would recommend you tone down the unfounded rhetoric.
In the first instance, I’ve asked you a question; I would like a response. I have always answered your questions posed directly to me as best as I’ve been able to (considering that I’m not a lawyer).
In the second instance, if you do not believe you’re going to get a straight answer out of me or anyone else on my site, then, as I’ve said to a few others before, feel free to type in another domain name in your browser’s address bar and frequent another site.
I think you already know that my site operates in goodwill and candor with respect to questions going back and forth; there is no sense in you suggesting that I manage my site otherwise.
Therefore, please answer my question.
-Phil
gladi8r says:
If I thought the birthers might win on this point, and thus compromise our sovereignty, I’d be concerned, but I see no real chance of that.
So if you don’t like his policies, don’t vote for him.
Turns out you’re wrong. I looked it up, and you can too — for free thanks to Google Books: http://books.google.com/books?id=cJENAAAAYAAJ
Barack Obama is the only U.S. president to offer his birth certificate. You can see it here: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
It’s safe for you to assume anything you wish to fool yourself into believing, simply because you have that right. It has no effect on Obama’s presidency, and neither does parroting the debunked myth that family members ever said what you say.
Phil says:
I’ve been suggesting you face reality, and one small part of that is accepting that Britain’s citizenship policies are of no significance to how the United States rules itself.
And thanks for asking, but I think I’m realistic about how birthers take my suggestions.
brygenon
brygenon,
Are you suggesting that we should simply ignore Mr. Obama’s British citizenship status at birth?
-Phil
earl,
Incorrect; the sites FactCheck and FightTheSmears have long since gone on record saying that Mr. Obama was a British citizen at birth. Therefore, at best, the President likely held dual citizenship at birth.
-Phil
Robert says:
That’s why the mainstream ignores you.
Be aware that we debunkers do the same for 9/11 inside-jobbers, moon-walk deniers, perpetual motion machine cranks, and such.
gladi8r wrote:
Because he was born in the United States, where our law, and not that of Britain, rules. Why do you guys want to give up our sovereignty by letting other nations exclude presidential candidates?