Jury Update: Fraud, Treason Indictment; Juries Now Online
Sam Sewell, national spokesperson for AmericanGrandJury.org, cross-posted the following update on his blog:
(United States of America) – May 9th 2009 – At 2 P.M, ET American Grand Jury convened a final hearing to vote on criminal charges against Barack Obama.
The following criminal allegations and complaints were voted upon:
COUNT ONE:
That Obama is NOT eligible under the laws of the Constitution of the United States as provided for in Article II, Section 1.
Said Article II, Section 1 states:
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
Wherefore, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” for the following reasons:
1) Obama was NOT born of mother and father who were BOTH US Citizens. 2) Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth.’COUNT TWO:The charge of “Treason” against Obama is before the people of the United States of America. That such complaint is CRIMINAL, of high crimes, and extremely damaging against the people.Said complaint was formally brought by a Military Officer (retired) of the United States of America. All United States Military Officers are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States and such complaint is valid, explicit and proper; when an Officer is aware of such malfeasance of Treason by an offender it is that Officer’s SWORN duty to come forward and present such accusation and complaint;
The Military Officer who filed the complaint is Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick, III, retired, United States Navy and a graduate of the United States Naval Academy;
Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick on March 17, 2009 did hereby make such criminal accusation and complaint against Obama and presented said complaint before the U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee;
An original photocopy of said complaint was submitted to the Grand Jury as evidence for immediate investigation;
Said original photocopy of the complete criminal complaint is attached as Exhibit “A” hereto and made a part hereof;
Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick was sworn under oath before the Grand Jury to testify as to the true nature and details regarding said criminal complaint filed against Obama;
Said criminal complaint by Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick and his “accusation of Treason” is quoted in the excerpts below:
Now you [Obama] have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors-command racketeers-are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.
We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.
Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy.
My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.
After reviewing the evidence and voting, the 25 member American Grand Jury handed down the presentment(s) recommending that person(s) known as Barack Obama, aka: Barack Obama, Jr., aka: Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro; aka: Barry Obama; aka: Barack H. Obama, aka: Barack Obama II, presumed President of the United States, be tried in Criminal Court for charges of fraud (eligibility) and treason.
Said Grand Jury was convened under the power and authority vested with the people as guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America, Amendent 5 of the Bill of Rights.
The American Grand Jury was served by people from different States within the Union, said people being citizens as were sworn under Oath as to Eligibility for and Service in behalf of the Grand Jury.
The above excerpts from the formal presentments of the May 9th American Grand Jury hearing are hereby released to the public as a PRESS RELEASE. All other details of the Grand Jury hearing, specifically, the jury membership, sworn affidavits of service, testimony, evidence, hearing minutes and records have been sealed as required by law.
This Grand Jury hearing of May 9th is in addition to the formal presentments, (charges of Fraud and Treason) which were handed down against Barack Obama last week, known as the American Grand Jury hearing of April 29th, 2009. The April 29th presentments are already making their way into the court systems across the United States.
Please contact American Grand Jury through this website or contact ourNational Spokesperson below for further information or requests:
Sam Sewell,
National Spokesperson for American Grand Juryhttp://americangrandjury.org/
Email: writerpromo@comcast.net
Fax (239) 591-1987
Phone: Clinic Office – (239) 591-4565
Ask for Dr. Sam [emphases original]
In addition to the above action, 6 other States are in the process of holding online jury gatherings, and Carl Swensson has provided the following update regarding the Georgia citizen grand jury:
**** Breaking news ****
Georgia Citizen Grand Jury re-convened today at 1:00 and has added the charge ofTREASON to its Presentment. Has also addressed the issue of COMPLICITY by those not responding to previous Indictment. [emphases original]
A current listing of citizen/common law grand jury updates and eligibility cases can be found here.
-Phil
Similar Posts:
- Jury Update: Online Grand Jury Indicts Obama for Fraud, Treason
- Jury Update: WorldNetDaily Coverage of Citizen Grand Jury Indictments
- Military Officers Sign on to Treason Complaint; More Citizen Grand Jury Action
- Eligibility Update: Steele Says Obama Not Vetted, Quo Warranto, Grand Jury and Secret Service!
- Eligibility Update: TN Grand Jury Presentation; Update: A Second Treason Allegation?
I am in complete favor to indict AKA Obama, Barry and all the rest of his, I will make a guess of 50 or more names. Also of great importance is the fact, yes I said fact, Obama has used hypnosis during the time of his election. He learned very well. He learned from the very best. Dr. Milton Erickson M.D. He used it during the election but he will deny it. Just as he is using every day when he is alone with someone and want’s to fire them. They wont’ even know he did it or what even happen. See for yourself. Type in Dr Milton Erickson Obama. Read all about it yourself.He destroyed our country in 100 days with this method. Guess what he can do and destroy in the next few months. I urge you to take this very seriously. Or America is finished as we know it by a criminally insane schizophrenic,AKA person who the world does not know. I’m 76 and for the first time in my life I and my children and their’s to come have no president or country. He destroyed our country and killed our children’s future. Please God, in the name of Jesus Christ please put this man away before he kills the rest of our once upon a time the greatest country in the world, not any more. We are the big joke and countries are laughing their butts off. Because we got an AkA who America does not know till we throw him out of our white house, Yes ours. Not his. He shows arrogance and cockiness because he knows how to use his hypnosis.
Sincerly Grace Strutz
Phil:
Well there’s your problem, right there Phil.
You’re asking the wrong person again.
earl,
Would you mind producing the actual request, please?
-Phil
Phil says:
May 19, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“I think we first need confirmation of when and who requested the certification of live birth. Surely there is a record of such a request existing somewhere.”
By Hawaiian law, the only person who could have requested and received a copy of it is Barack Obama. The date is on the back of the BC, June 6, 2007.
Broseph wrote:
Fact-Check is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, within the Annenberg School of Communication, part of the University of Pennsylvania, which U.S. News and World Report currently ranks as (tied for) number six on the list of best U.S. universities. http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/national-search
No one is stopping you from getting it straight except yourself. As the Fact-Check article explains, the document he showed and offered for inspection is simply what his birth state now issues. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
Nonsense. Conspiracy theories are immune to evidence. There’s no document you cannot fantasize to be a forgery. Plus, other birthers say the certificate is not the issue — it’s really about President Obama’s father being a foreigner.
I don’t even really want you to walk away. Birthers like to pretend that they’re pressuring President Obama and that we o-bots are running scared. Here in the real world, failure and defeat are all you know, and watching you heap more of it upon yourselves is merely entertainment.
Joseph Maine,
I think we first need confirmation of when and who requested the certification of live birth. Surely there is a record of such a request existing somewhere.
-Phil
Broseph,
Try typing in [blockquote][/blockquote] (replacing the square brackets with angle brackets) surrounding the quotes you want to quote. Then, use the Preview button to see if it turns out right.
-Phil
By the way, Phil,
Rep. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia has introduced HR1503 to the Congress in Virginia. It is another that says a copy of the birth certificate.
Do you think they need to say “original”?
What if I think that the COLB is an obvious fake (which it is)? Obviously it’d be another step … but could you then take the copy to Fukino or Okubo and force them to verify that it is legitimate?
Phil,
I can’t get this tagging to work. I apologize. There were two small quotes from brygenon in the previous post that was I trying to get as those gray blocks like everyone else uses — in order to respond to the previous assertions. Any help is appreciated, thanks
Bro
Brygenon,
You said:
Sure: Jess Henig. I thought I has cited that… oh look– I did. Here it is again: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html.
Fox reporters also examined it, but I don’t have a link to a report on that.
It’s interesting that you quote, yet again, the only news group that was supposedly viewing it, and that news group isn’t a news group at all. It’s a website/blog. Why should this be deemed reputable in the least? Then you throw out “Fox” to stab and garner some sort of legitimacy … but you don’t know where the link is. Sure. You can’t even find one regular news organization like ABC, NBC, CBS, sheesh you can’t even quote the Associated Press. Why? They weren’t there and NO ONE SHOWED anything.
Furthermore, who the heck is Jess Hennig? This is hysterical! Why would she be the only one to see it and comment on it?
Actually Obama is the *only* President to publicly show his birth certificate.
Just let me get this straight. He won’t release the original to anyone. How do we know he’s even 35 years old? He releases something that was changed 3 times originally put on the internet, and blacked out, which means it DOESN’T serve as prima facie anything. He didn’t show it to Congress. No one voted on his legitimacy with all the questions … leaving one final question.
If he is so legit, why doesn’t he have the honesty and transparency to just show the original?
Sadly, no one can answer the easiest question; it is the question that just by asking you expose him as a fraud at worst, and charlatan at best.
There’s no other explanation why not to show an original birth certificate, except for that he isn’t legit. It is the most obvious human test as a bullsh** detector, and just continues to scream it.
That’s why it won’t go away. Show it, and we all walk away. But then he also goes to jail. So he’ll never show unless a judge actually starts thinking about the Constitution and gets “change” out of his ass … where his head has been all along.
Glacialhills wrote:
Glacialhills, don’t you get it yet? You are only half right:
This is not just a fanciful, intellectual exercise… it is a complete fiction. I am not here to banter, I am here to expose you something you seem to have little general exposure to:
Evidence and reason.
Broseph says:
Sure: Jess Henig. I thought I has cited that… oh look– I did. Here it is again: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html.
Fox reporters also examined it, but I don’t have a link to a report on that.
Hard to tell from this distance, but I think sensible readers will figure why your investigation came out as it did.
Reporters showed up and there it was.
Actually Obama is the *only* President to publicly show his birth certificate.
Broseph, you’re just not dealing with reality. Even Obama’s serious political opponents want nothing to do with your nonsense. If my thinking is the joke, how come all the laughter is at yours?
To all the Loyalists,who outnumbered the separatists 8-1, the founding fathers were considered murderers and common criminals, and the men that signed the Declaration of Independence knew if they failed to rid the fledgling republic from England’s tyrannical grip, they would all be hung for treason. THEY had the stones to stand up anyway and be men and face that prospect and to bring about the freedom we are now squandering away. Are there any among us today that can or will do the same? Or will we just rant and rave about what is happening, while doing nothing to stop it? Why do you think that memo was posted recently for the fbi to keep an eye on the returning soldiers,tea party-goers,pocket constitution carrying men and woman for signs of organized resistance? Because these brave men and woman who have fought for our county already, are directly charged with upholding the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic and have the skills and bravery to carry it out. Everyone that has ever taken that oath to defend the Constitution and still believe in this country, should be getting ready to uphold that oath. There are only 2 sides to a revolution. And the losers never write the history for the winners.I truly hope and pray it wont have to come down to that. And this mess will be settled peacefully and by the rule of law.But either way it must be settled for our nation to continue to exist.
Historiandude….Don’t you get it yet? This is not just a fanciful,intellectual exercise for you to ponder and banter about…Look at the history of the rest of the world and understand that civil wars are started with much less fuel than this issue.
brygenon,
Who is “EVERYONE” who checked his birth certificate and found it to be authentic? Can you name one person? How come they wouldn’t show me when I went? Was there ever a public viewing or media viewing?
Just because you want to believe it is authentic doesn’t mean it is. And that’s exactly what you are doing, wanting to believe it. There’s no escaping the reality that he doesn’t want to show anybody anything? This is inarguable. He just doesn’t. You don’t see that as a lack of honesty and integrity.
Put politics aside. Reason is clear. Your line of thinking is a joke. Just show the real birth certificate and we won’t be talking about it … except because he’d no longer be president. It’s the most obvious use of the human brain possible. Only those with something to hide don’t come clean.
Phil says:
What a mess. There’s no special clue-in authority needed for any issue. On the other hand, as a Senator and Whip of his party — the party in opposition to Obama — Kyl did and does have significant authority on this matter.
Phil, refusing to take the clues has no effect on the world other than leaving you clueless. To advance your cause, you needed to convince people such as Senator Kyl; he has no need to convince you.
Everyone who examined Obama’s birth certificate found it to be authentic, for example: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html.
The law says the authoritative forums matter. That joint session of Congress that certified President Obama’s election — that wasn’t just a publicity stunt. Check the Constitution.
Wow. How far from reality can you get?
Phil asked:
I’m more of a spokesman for reality. Don’t shoot the messenger.
brygenon,
Technically, you are correct. No authority is required, because there is no law that requires eligibility to be legally substantiated.
First of all, there is no objective fact that conclusively shows that Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen, as at least two forensics experts — as we both know — have gone on record to show that the certification of live birth is inconclusive in this respect.
Secondly, I certainly am not going to stop you from considering that what I post or comment is “rumor” and/or that I’m a “fringe theorist;” you have every right to be wrong.
“Authoritative forums” only matter in the court of public opinion. What really counts is what the law says.
Yeah, and? It’s one opinion against another.
Perhaps you can enlighten me how anyone can win or lose a case that has yet to be heard.
Red herring. The rules have been the same since the writing of the Constitution, so I’m not sure to what you refer RE: “change [of] the rules.”
-Phil
God Bless Texas – Lone Star Grand Jury Indicts Obama
The Lone Star Grand Jury
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/god-bless-texas-lone-star-grand-jury.html
35 Texas Citizens The indictment: Fraud and Treason
There was never a hint of indecision when this group of concerned citizens got together in Texas and decided to go to work. In their minds “the man who hates America” needed to be indicted and the sooner the better. The jury spent a week reviewing and contemplating the evidence but the vote was swift and decisive. All 35 members raised their hands and said, “we want this man tried in court and we are now looking to the Great State of Texas to bring that justice to our citizens.”
Sam Sewell,
National Spokesperson for American Grand Jury
http://americangrandjury.org/
Email: writerpromo@comcast.net
Fax (239) 591-1987P
hone: Clinic Office – (239) 591-4565
Ask for Dr. Sam
Texas Law: : “The grand jury’s investigation of any matter may be initiated by the court, the district attorney, its own members, or any credible person. The grand jury may summon witnesses by subpoena and examine them under oath. On completion of an investigation the grand jury determines by vote whether or not an indictment should be presented to the court; nine votes are necessary for a decision to indict, and nine members also constitute a quorum.”
Phil wrote:
I had hoped people would read it for its meaning rather than merely parsing it.
No authority is required, but according to WND, this was a reply to a constituent, coming from Kyl’s Senate office.
Kly simply stated the fact, then explained that the constituent’s issues about Obama were rumors already debunked. These are the same rumors that you are spreading, Phil. Government officials generally do not debate fringe theorists.
That Kyl cannot convince you is a moot point. That you cannot convince Kyl, or even get such serious political opponents of Obama to take you seriously, means that you are perusing a fantasy.
That’s not what the authoritative forums say. Birthers wrote to Senators and House members to advance their theories, but they got not single member of the U.S. Congress to object to certifying the election.
Phil, your novel theories on what your unnamed other case says are moot.
“Likely”? That’s the man who always loses on the case that always loses.
Let’s face it — you want to change the rules ex post facto because you can’t stand that Barack H. Obama won fair and square.
Callis:
The only reason I get no response on the other blogs is because they ban non-Birthers. Me included.
Please forward this video to everyone in America, particularly everyone in your local government, and then follow up and accomplish!
http://tinyurl.com/q38c2t
brygenon,
So, are you now HistorianDude’s spokesperson/chief of staff?
-Phil
brygenon,
Let’s parse what you’ve just said, shall we?
By what authority did the Senate Republican Whip make this claim? And exactly where did he look — in a public records depository, or a private, non-governmental web site? I thought it was the electoral process, per se, via the People, that much of the opposition claimed “enforced” eligibility. But wait a minute — there is no legal requirement to substantiate eligibility at this time, so I guess that makes this claim a moot point, now, doesn’t it?
While it is true that the Joint Session of Congress certified the election, just as with the Chief Justice, said certification in no way, shape or form is, per se, an enforcement of eligibility. Rather, it merely certifies that votes have been delivered to Capitol Hill from the several States.
There is similarly another case at the State level in California that claims that the Secretary of State is wholly responsible for vetting candidates for President. This means that, hopefully, a higher Court will be able to hear arguments and make a decision as to which case supersedes the other, or come up with another solution (and with Dr. Amb. Keyes appealing, this is likely to occur).
It’s one opinion versus another.
Let’s face it — you’re perfectly fine with the system as it is now, I think it could be made better.
-Phil
Callis wrote:
The points HistorianDude makes are about the real world. Those blogs that don’t take him seriously might not be as important as you think.
You did reply. Look, I’m quoting it.
Phil says:
Want an explicit statement of eligibility? The Senate Republican Whip wrote, “Senator Obama meets the constitutional requirements for presidential office.” Want the authoritative body’s decision? The U.S. Congress certified the election of President Obama on 08 Jan 2009. Want a court to tell you that’s final? The ruling in Keyes v. Bowen includes, “the appropriate remedy for an issue concerning the qualifications of a President is an action before the United States Congress pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 3 U.S.C. section 15.”
Want a clue that the theory saying a natural born citizen must have two citizens as parents is bunk? Try WVPatriot’s comment and my response.
That’s Laugh:
That’s one possibility.
Another is that the movement will peter out and die altogether.
James:
Obama has provided not a penny in aid to have Hamas move here. You have been misinformed.
JeffM:
For starters, this was not a Grand Jury.
Second, nobody has to “declare” anything. No federal judge even has to feign interest on the issue. These indictments will continue to meet the response they are meeting now. They will be completely ignored by the actual organs of government.
You are completely off the hook. No judge will even take judicial notice.
[Unneeded condescension] from Poppet:
He did not.
1. Even the original Birther claim had nothing to do with the Bar Exam. It had to do with Obama’s State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record.
2. The Registration requires him to list any previous names under which he has practiced law.
3. He has never practiced law under any name other than “Barack Hussein Obama.”
Most people do not realize this for a very good reason. There is no evidence that it is true.
brygenon,
Not that you and I haven’t been over this many, many times before, but it bears repeating for the newer readers of my bodaciously kewl site:
The Chief Justice having sworn in the President is in no way, shape or form any explicit or implicit admission respecting eligibility, nor can the Chief Justice have such an authority vested in him.
-Phil
[...] May 12, 2009 by kathy (United States of America) – May 9th 2009 – At 2 P.M, ET American Grand Jury convened a final hearing to vote on criminal charges against Barack Obama. Read more here. [...]
If the Attorneys General do not respond to these common law indictments, then the movement will gather steam and lead to a general recognition that we no longer have a legitimate governement in the land…
JeffM wrote:
NO.
Only Grand Juries that have been impaneled and sworn in by judges have any power or authority.
There is no such thing as a grassroots or citizens “grand jury”.
Step 1: The COURT impanels the Grand Jury.
Step 2: The Grand Jury meets, investigates, and in some cases returns indictments.
Step 3: The Court acts on the indictments.
The Federal Courts have no authority whatsoever to recognize or act upon submissions from pretend or fake “Grand Juries”.
A “Grand Jury” is not an ad hoc group of citizens who come together of their own accord. It is group of citizens that is constituted by and empowered by a court, as an extension of the court — just like a petit jury, but with a different function.
WVPatriot wrote:
From the Chief Justice of the United States…
Congratulations Mr. President.
Source: John G. Roberts Jr. addressing Barack H. Obama II, inauguration of the 44′th President of the United States, 20 Jan 2009.
Poppet says:
May 11, 2009 at 3:42 pm
“born here, both parents”
Utter nonsense. “Both parents must be citizens” is a theory from Donofrio. A theory not supported by any US law. No one had ever heard of that “requirement” until 9 months ago when people glommed onto it because it disqualified Obama. All of a sudden a theory became an oft repeated meme, became ‘the law, I tell you’. Completely untrue.
Being born on US soil means you are a born citizen. Parents status is not a factor. Since under the 14th amendment there are only 2 types of citizens – born and naturalized – anyone born here meets the eligibility requirements for President. Obama knows this. That’s why he could stand proudly and say his father was a Kenyan student. Come on, don’t you think if it were that straight forward the FEC wouldn’t have booted him from the ballot? Use your common sense. The only way for ya-ll to disqualify Obama is to prove he was not born in the US.
JeffM says:
The 9/11 inside-jobbers have had similar self-proclaimed “grand juries” indicting G. W. Bush and others for three or four years now. Federal judges have found no need to declare anything about them. The judges, like most everyone else, simply ignore them.
Should judges do what judges have been doing, it will stay right were it is [unneeded verbiage].
Historiandode- Giving Aid and Comfort to Hamas who has legally declared War on the United States, might be treason. Millions upon millions in aid to have these peoples move here and to rebuild for Isreal’s responce to their murders of their civilians and children. Yes I believe that might be treason, but with empathy.
LOL!the historian gringo never gives up.Besides Phil.nobody takes you seriously on any blogs.Well,this is the last one that you bother with because you get a response from Phil.You are far from a legal or constitutional scholar.If you had comments worthy of debate I would reply.
From Obama’s own words…
Four years ago, I stood before you and told you my story – of the brief union between a young man from Kenya and a young woman from Kansas who weren’t well-off or well-known, but shared a belief that in America, their son could achieve whatever he put his mind to.
Source: Barack Obama, Democratic National Convention Speech, 28 Aug 2008.
Tonight is a particular honor for me because, let’s face it, my presence on this stage is pretty unlikely. My father was a foreign student, born and raised in a small village in Kenya.
Source: Barack Obama, 2004 Democratic National Convention Keynote Address, 27 Jul 2004.
Jack wrote:
The made-up facts just keep coming. Is there an explanation of why the pregnant Mrs. McCain traveled from Coco Solo Naval Air Station, on the Atlantic coast of Panama, to Panama City, on the Pacific side? The plaintiff in Hollander v. McCain falsely reported McCain’s birth place as the city of Colon, which at least is nearby.
A natural born citizen is simply a citizen by birth. John McCain was born a citizen because of his parents’ citizenship and residency. It would not have mattered had he been born off the naval base, but there’s no credible evidence he was.
“Historian”Dude wrote:
Only a federal judge can declare whether a Grand Jury has Constitutional authority over said case. You don’t have a say. I don’t have a say. None of us have a say except those who are empowered to do so.
Should a federal judge claim it un-Constitutional it will go immediately to the U.S. Supreme Court for clarification. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 dollars.
If SCROTUS says it’s un-Constitutional, so be it. But they better have a really really good reason because right now there appears to be no way to enforce the Constitution. At this rate no one really knows what they will do because they’re too busy drinking martinis with certain members of Con.grass and the Usurping “Administration” to care, at least until their livelihood is threatened or someone urinates in their tea, which has happened to other branches of the government already.
They should be “charging” Obama with the many statutes relating
to “fraud” and “impersonation”. He lied when he took the Illinois
Bar Exam.
If any (average) person impersonate’s a Dr., Lawyer, judge, etc..,
they are “charged”.
The fact that he is now impersonating a “President” as a non-natural born citizen is fraud.
He is nothing but a common criminal who broke the law, who
should be “charged” in any court. (impeachment laws are different).
The entire Congress should be charged with aiding and abeiting a
common criminal.
If I, or anyone put on a policeman’s uniform, and wrote a ticket
to someone, I would be locked up in a heartbeat.
Most people do not realize that being “born on the soil” (jus soil)
has nothing to do with being a “natural born citen” to BOTH “parent’S” who have alligence to the u.s. as a citizen.
Obama’s father was never a u.s. citizen.
If we really want something to happen we need to be writing US Attorney Taylor and flooding his office with letters asking that he open up an quo warranto investigation. Here’s a good place to turn to if you’re not sure what that is/means or what i’m talking about. http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
Jack says:
May 11, 2009 at 10:32 am
Actually John McCain one of our great war heros was not eligible to run for President – but the democrats who like the man immensely overlooked the fact that John really wasn’ born on the base in Panama instead he wads born in Panama City. So he not Obama was not eligible to run.
We who uphold the constitution congratulate the citizens of Georgia for their undying loyalty – but people you have the wrong man!
So, Jack, you’re saying that Obama IS eligible? McCain is not the issue here.
Phil says “Similarly to the way that any private individual can approach an FBI agent or US Attorney with paperwork for the authorities to further investigate, so, too, is the purpose behind these private gatherings.”
Phil,
Your website is truly enjoyable, and I have greatly appreciate all you have done. Your statement is clearly accurate, but if memory serves the aforementioned investigating bodies are both executive branch. Thus, we are expecting Obama to investigate Obama. This would have about as much credibility as Ayers, Factcheck.org, ACORN, MOVEON.org, the DNC, Nancy Pelosi…well you get my point. The opportunity for the US government to investigate and deliberate ended with the SCOTUS. The quiet now will not last, and the failure of the US government to uphold the Constitution will not be looked at favorably.
WVPatriot,
Similarly to the way that any private individual can approach an FBI agent or US Attorney with paperwork for the authorities to further investigate, so, too, is the purpose behind these private gatherings.
-Phil
What good can come from these?
Who are going to enforce the decisions of these citizen grand juries?
“Count One” is abject pseudolaw. The stated “reasons” for the count are imaginary “requirements” that are found nowhere in Article II of the US Constitution… in fact nowhere in the Constitution, American Statute or American judicial decisions. An individual cannot be reasonably indicted for breaking laws that do not exist.
“Count Two” is actually very close to incomprehensible. A charge of “treason” would require an actual exposition of the treasonous act of which the defendant is being accused. And treason is the only crime that is actually defined by the United States Constitution.
Article III Section 3 defines treason as follows:
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Neither Walt Fitzpatrick nor the indictment specify any such acts.
So… completely ignoring the fact that the “American Grand Jury” has exactly zero authority under the Constitution to act on its complaints or compel any organ of government to act… these indictments are legally unintelligible even from a purely theoretical perspective.
Actually John McCain one of our great war heros was not eligible to run for President – but the democrats who like the man immensely overlooked the fact that John really wasn’ born on the base in Panama instead he wads born in Panama City. So he not Obama was not eligible to run.
We who uphold the constitution congratulate the citizens of Georgia for their undying loyalty – but people you have the wrong man!
I am very curious of why or how Obama is deflecting the Constitution and being allowed to do so. It needs to end NOW.