Connerat v. Obama: Case Dismissed
Spencer Connert, Plaintiff pro se in Connerat v. Obama, had his case dismissed today. The following is from a communication with him:
Dear Phil – I have always reported to you in a timely and truthful manner. What happened today on the second floor, in the Old Pinellas Courthouse was a miscarriage of Justice. The U.S. Constitution did not matter to the judge. She wanted to talk about Florida law. There was no defense…Obama DID NOT SHOW, nor did his ‘thugs.’ The Judge did not allow me to give my story. The Judge said that she was dismissing the case for no ’cause of action’ but my cause was clear: I had a right to press Obama on the eligibility issue, under Amendment X, since the feds. and the States did not do so. My letter was mailed November 12, 2008, BEFORE the Electors voted. I also took an Oath under the Florida Constitution to ‘protect and defend’ the Constitution OF THE UNITED STATES, as well as the Constitution of Florida. She would have none of it, not appreciating U.S. Constitution Article. VI… Phil, her mind was set before I opened my mouth. I am becoming very concerned about American jurisprudence…is this Mexico? Maybe I should grab a Dos Equis for Cinco de Mayo…and quit the game.
Connerat vs. Obama may make it to the Florida Supreme Court. As you know, I was there in December [Connerat v. Browning]. Yet, if I go again in this Pursuit, on appeal, it will be with a lawyer. The usurper remains, for now, but not for long. I hope that Mario had a more positive day.
Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama, had the following words of support for Spencer:
Regardless of what the judge decided, you did your part in our fight to expose the truth about Obama. Stay in the fight. We still have a ways to go.
While we await word on the results of the federal government’s request for an extension in his case, Mario posted a great article entitled, “The President’s Sole Allegiance at Birth Serves the Best Interest of the United States.”
A current listing of citizen grand jury updates and eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
-Phil
Similar Posts:
- Connerat v. Browning: Yes, This One is Over
- Connerat v. Browning: FL Election Result Challenge
- Connerat v. Browning: FL Case Dismissed
- Eligibility Update: Connerat v. Obama Refiled; FL Realtor Readies Complaint (Docs Attached); Election Law Bills in Congress
- Lightfoot v. Bowen: Application for Stay Denied; Other Case Info; Dr. Taitz to File for Writ
9/11 And Hawaii Lies
Made A President
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911HawaiiLies1.htm
john galt
one good reason why obama will not take
the Bush people to task, he knows it will backfire.
instead he’s going against soft targets like michael savage
by using his tools in England to set up the table.
there is a conspiracy going on here and it’s being done under the table
pretty scarey to the comparions to 1930s germany, very scary.
people need to wake up and see what’s going on, hey wait, gun sales are up, way up. Some people know what’s going on.
The Author of the following comment wrote:
What does filing an appeal cost? Connerat already spent $65 in fees, on his suit to recover $4.90.
sandra says:
If you learn nothing else from Connerat v. Obama, http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=5564 , at least understand that the postage to send those letters will not be recoverable via litigation.
Spencer, what are the steps to pursue this to the Florida Supreme Court? Is it too soon to ask, “What’s your game plan?”
AS an aside, perhaps this dear, WOMAN judge has set her sights on a SCOTUS position and is affirming her loyalty. I don’t know if she is in a position to be considered – perhaps she has already paid her taxes in full! (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)
On another note, I would love to see this whole elibility issue end up on TV with Judge Judy and to hear the tongue lashing Mr. Obama would get for falsifying records and for pretending to be elgible for the office of POTUS. That might bring him down a notch or two. His post-trial comments, no doubt directed at Rahm Emaunuel, might be that of astonishment, “Why wasn’t I informed that there might be a problem?”
I would think that writing a letter to the editor and publishing that letter in mass mailings on just how this judge licked the boots of OBAMA and crapped all over the Constitution.
File an appeal citing her bias.
sus,
Sarcasm on my site is completely appropriate only under the following conditions:
1. It’s completely directed at a public figure;
2. It’s completely directed at me (because I can take it);
3. It helps to move the conversation along and doesn’t go down too many rabbit holes
-Phil
I would love to flood the above mentioned Pinellus Hall of Justice with letters…if I knew the name/address of the lady judge to direct them too. She needs to know that THIS CASE, THIS TIME IN HISTORY, OUR EYES
Stay in the fight. We still have a ways to go>>>
I give it 1 year to 18 months at the most.
By that time Hussein will have his purging of the Bush people under control with a lot of them on their way to jail.
After that he and his MSM press core will come after all of his current opposition.
It is going to get really ugly.
Trust me on this one.
“She wanted to talk about Florida law. ”
A judge who wanted to talk about LAW!!!
Is the rule still in place about sarcasm Phil? Because I’d sure like to add some stuff.
more BS from the bench
time to take back our nation and hold these
anti Constitutionalists the door