WND: Obama Campaign Paid $1 million to Fight Eligibility Lawsuits?

WorldNetDaily is reporting what some — including myself — have been careful to substantiate: how much the President has been spending on eligibility lawsuits. Many rumors had been going around the Internet that the actual figure was at least $1 million, and recently the Politico had reported nearly three-quarters of a million dollars had been paid to a top law firm this year.

According to the following posting, WND appears to further substantiate the $1 million figure:

According to Federal Election Commission records, Obama For America paid $688,316.42 to international law firm Perkins Coie between January and March 2009.

FEC’s Obama For America 2009 April quarterly report, disbursements by payee

The campaign also compensated Perkins Coie for legal services between Oct. 16, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2008 – to the tune of $378,375.52.

Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie – top lawyer for Obama, Obama’s presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee and Obama’s Organizing for America – is the same Washington, D.C., lawyer defending President Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president.

As WND reported earlier, Bauer sent a letter to plaintiff Gregory Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, of Hollister v. Soetoro, threatening sanctions if he doesn’t withdraw his appeal of the eligibility case that earlier was tossed by a district judge because the issue already had been “twittered.”

Bauer’s warning was dated April 3 and delivered via letter to the plaintiff’s attorney, John D. Hemenway. It is not the first such warning issued. Lawyers trying to kill a similar California lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes also said they would seek sanctions against the plaintiff’s attorneys in that case unless they left the issue of the president’s eligibility alone.

“For the reasons stated in Judge Robertson’s ruling, the suit is frivolous and should not be pursued,” Bauer’s letter warned. “Should you decline to withdraw this frivolous appeal, please be informed that we intend to pursue sanctions, including costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and D.C. Circuit Rule 38.”

Bauer also represented Obama and the DNC in Philip Berg’s eligibility lawsuit and various other legal challenges. He and the White House have not responded to WND’s request for comment.

Perkins Coie serves high-profile clients such as Microsoft, Amazon and Starbucks. In 2006, the firm also represented Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Osama bin Laden’s alleged bodyguard and driver.

The FEC allows elected officials to use campaign funds to pay legal fees only if the action/investigations arise as a result of their tenure in office or campaigns, according to Politico.

The FEC report also reveals Obama For America has spent nearly $9.5 million in the first three months of this year – of which $6,365 in legal fees paid by Obama For America also went to Oldaker, Biden & Belair, a firm founded by Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

This information — particularly the copy of the letter sent by Mr. Bauer to Mr. Hemenway — seems to reasonably substantiate that the President has spent approximately $1 million during and after his campaign to fight these suits. And unless it can be shown that the post-election legal payments were unlawful, there is nothing illegal about any of this.

Yet, what it does point out is that the President is going to great lengths to be sure that he fights every possibility of his vital documentation being revealed.


69 thoughts on “WND: Obama Campaign Paid $1 million to Fight Eligibility Lawsuits?”

  1. It seems to me that the President could end the frivolity if he just submitted the sealed documentation from the Hawaiian HHS; I had to provide a certified copy of my BC to obtain a driver’s license. I ask, what is more important….establising my sitizenship to drive, or establishing one for the President of the US?

    It seems we the citizens can force the issue by next election…we can make it mandatory for all person seeking to hold to prove their citizenship to the states. It can’t be a federal madate as the feds can’t regulate state electin laws, but we can certainly force our states to mandate supporting documents!

  2. I find it interesting that the only “evidence” offered up to the eligibility questions is name calling. Obviously some have no interest in knowing the answer…they are totally satisfied to have Mr. Obama in the white house and that is enough for them.
    Wikipedia states that Mr. Obama was a British subject at birth by virtue of his father’s status as one. He and one other president were born British subjects. The other one, Chester Arthur, lied and did everything humanly possible to keep his birth status a secret…I guess I’ll have to look up the page I read that on, for backing.

  3. An open letter to Robert Bauer:

    Please don’t forget to disclose THE VENUS, 12 U.S. 253 (1814), and Vattel’s Law of Nations to the courts in your defense of the Usurper in Chief.

    To fail to disclose THE VENUS and Vattel’s Law of Nations would be a breach of the Model Code of Professional Conduct.

    Model Code of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3, states,
    (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
    (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal…
    (2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

    With regard to Vattel, the Supreme Court of the United States, in THE VENUS, specifically stated, “Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘the citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”

    Vattel’s Law of Nations, § 212, states “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    Hence, natural born citizens, “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    Unfortunatley, your client’s father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., was not a citizen of the United States.

    Thus, even if Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii, he is NOT a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America.

    Thus, your client is a usurper, and you are obligated to disclose this FACT…

Leave a Reply