Should this case have seen some activity due yesterday, May 5th, 2009? Wasn’t there a ruling due on the defendant’s request for an extension?

As I mentioned in this posting yesterday, yes, we’re awaiting word on what the results have been.

-Phil

If you can’t answer this simple question, how are you going to win this case?

Please don’t forget to disclose THE VENUS, 12 U.S. 253 (1814), and Vattel’s Law of Nations, to the Honorable James B. Simandle, and to the Honorable Joel Schneider, in your Answer to Mr. Kerchner…

To fail to disclose THE VENUS and Vattel’s Law of Nations in your answer would be a breach of the Model Code of Professional Conduct.

Model Code of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3:
(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal…
(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel;

With regard to Vattel, the Supreme Court of the United States, in THE VENUS, specifically stated, “Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘the citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”

Vattel’s Law of Nations, § 212, states “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

Hence, natural born citizens, “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

Thus, your client is a usurper, and you are obligated to disclose this FACT to the Honorable James B. Simandle, and to the Honorable Joel Schneider, of the United States District Court, District Court of New Jersey.

Not nonsense in my opinion. Here is a recent case a person, Sanjai Shah was born in Kenya in 1962 rendering him citizen of the UKC at birth, became an automatic Kenya citizen in 1963 at it’s independence. At that time, dual citzenship was allowed for children, his were, citizen of the UKC and Kenya citizen. He denounced Kenyan citizenship after age 21 and was left with the sole citizenship of the UKC. He had to fight for that right as an
adult but ultimately the UK honored it’s obligation. So if Obama
was born in Kenya he is still a citizen of the UKC.
http://www.workpermit.com/news/2005-07-04/uk/kenya_airport_man.htm

Hey Phil, thanks for running the ad at the top of this page that goes to http://www.capitolconnect.com/fairhealthcare — that’s a great cause and I am glad to know that you are doing your part to help visitors to your site sign on.

If you are a lawyer, then you should know that these are Google AdSense ads; that’s not difficult to pick up on, especially as other sites run exactly the same types of ads as mine. They are not specific to any one “sponsor.”

Again, your tone is rather abrasive, especially when you know better. I’d suggest toning down before I need to take further action.

-Phil

You are Playing with words, brygeon. Obama was not born a Britsih subject he was born a citizen of the UKC, Obama himself says he was born a “citizen of the UKC”. Wouldn’t he know? Factcheck:

You seen to have misunderstood the point at issue. One of the birther lawyers claimed that Barack Obama is, even now, a British citizen. Utter nonsense of course.

You are Playing with words, brygeon. Obama was not born a Britsih subject he was born a citizen of the UKC, Obama himself says he was born a “citizen of the UKC”. Wouldn’t he know? Factcheck:

In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was a…. citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

So yes, the the UK knows he was not born a british subject and so does Obama II… He was born a citizen of the UKC.(CUKC) And it was not soley by descent.

To speak on behalf of the UK and/or Obama must mean that you can cite your sources.

First, the clues I post are from me to the readers. I don’t speak on anyone else’s behalf.

Here a free on-line source, from the British government:

http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/nationalityinstructions/nisec2gensec/independence?view=Binary

Just read a disturbing article. Apparently Obama and his thugs are working on a “new” birth cert. According to the article, typewriters, papers, chemicals have been purchased. Some in Canada to reproduce a b.c that would look like one from the 60’s. Why else does he want an extension? Source says it should be ready in 1 – 2 months.

Everyone ask, why is the press and others not taking this on? If you search enough, you will find accusations of bullying to actual threats.

Regardless, facts are facts. He lost his citizenship when he went to indonesia.

Maybe we do need another “tea party” and have the citizens demand all his records be releases.

This man has way too many connections for us to wait. The sooner he is declared an userper, the better off we are. WHAT ARE WAITING FOR!!!

This issue has been addressed here.

-Phil

Everyone ask, why is the press and others not taking this on? If you search enough, you will find accusations of bullying to actual threats.

Regardless, facts are facts. He lost his citizenship when he went to indonesia.

Maybe we do need another “tea party” and have the citizens demand all his records be releases.

This man has way too many connections for us to wait. The sooner he is declared an userper, the better off we are. WHAT ARE WAITING FOR!!!

The U.K. does not think Obama is a British subject, and neither does Obama.

To speak on behalf of the UK and/or Obama must mean that you can cite your sources.

-Phil

And as far as the burden of proof, here’s all the proof you need:

Soetoro was born under the jurisdiction of the Crown of England and continues to be a subject under the Crown of England.

Jeff, you have all the proof you need for the world in your head, but here in the real one you lose every time. The U.K. does not think Obama is a British subject, and neither does Obama.

Time for Soetoro to let go. He’s going to lose this fight.

Obama already won. The open question here is how much defeat the birthers need to heap upon themselves.

And as far as the burden of proof, here’s all the proof you need:

Soetoro was born under the jurisdiction of the Crown of England and continues to be a subject under the Crown of England.

Evidence is a plenty. Just check fightthesmears.com and factcheck.org. No one can be a leader of this nation when they are a subject under the jurisdiction of another nation. Article II guarantees this for obvious reasons. And the War of 1812 reinforces this predicament.

Time for Soetoro to let go. He’s going to lose this fight. Hence all scurrying around to steal more money before he gets tossed out.