Comments on: Concerned Citizens Encouraged to Contact US Attorney Over Eligibility

By: camp joy slim

camp joy slim — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:26:29 +0000

We have communism in the gov.so what do you expect, they are going too do what ever they can to bring down our country for a take over,,,obama hate’s the US , anyone with a half a brain can see what they are doing,He has outlawed his way in ,and it is up to us to get him out, there will be a lot to go with him too , I know the christians of this country will never let this kind of BS get very far .

By: Eva Baumann

Eva Baumann — Sat, 30 May 2009 18:26:48 +0000

What is really important is — to expose Barrack Hussein Obama or whatever his name is and his handlers before he and they are able to appoint individuals into office to help them HIDE who they really are and their true intentions for America.

We must do everything within our powers before it’s to late before all of our Freedom have been taken away. Time is of the essence!

If good men stand by and do nothing evil will flourish.

By: Fighter

Fighter — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:04:07 +0000

A little information: I called the U S Attorney’s office two days in a row. (202 514 7566 and 7558) Evidently not many people are calling, because the person answering the phone is screening the calls and she reconized me as calling the day before. I do not believe the “call in information” is going to get to Jeffrey Taylor unless they are swamped with calls and letters. If a person answering the phone can tell I called the day before that is too few of calls coming in. We need to let Mr. Taylor know we are concerned about this situation in the White House. We are going to have to get by the screening with shear volume.

By: earl

earl — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:04:28 +0000

Phil,
No, you didn’t follow my logic at all. You said you think when people write that they want to take violent action they are merely “venting” and don’t mean anything by it. I disagreed by pointing out that history shows us again and again that people who threaten violence often follow through. Wong and Poplawski are days-old examples. And we often hear after a violent episode “we all knew he was going to explode one day.” My logic had everything to do with hoping law enforcement follows up when people “vent” and nothing to do with censoring people. But thanks for (again) twisting my words into something I didn’t mean at all. You are quite adept at it.

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:30:41 +0000

earl,

I would expect law enforcement is not assuming that. When people write that they might take the law into their own hands, I am inclined to believe that they actually mean it and some eventually will try. Richard Poplawski. Jiviny Wong. They told people what they were going to do and no one thought they meant it. We have to stop making that mistake of assuming that talk of violence is “just venting.”

To follow this logic, let’s ban all video games and all movies above (or below) a PG rating, as they clearly incite people to “vent” their emotions in all kinds of ways.

In case I need to make it obvious, I’m demonstrating the absurdity of your point by being absurd.

-Phil

By: earl

earl — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:07:22 +0000

Phil says:
” don’t think anyone is saying they’re actually going to do this.”

I would expect law enforcement is not assuming that. When people write that they might take the law into their own hands, I am inclined to believe that they actually mean it and some eventually will try. Richard Poplawski. Jiviny Wong. They told people what they were going to do and no one thought they meant it. We have to stop making that mistake of assuming that talk of violence is “just venting.”

By: Jacqlyn Smith

Jacqlyn Smith — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:22:20 +0000

Phil says:
April 6, 2009 at 9:10 pm

brygenon,

Enough of the back-and-forth from both of you. Get on with an actual conversation or take it off the blog.

-Phil

******************************************************************
Thank you PHIL!

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:10:37 +0000

brygenon,

Enough of the back-and-forth from both of you. Get on with an actual conversation or take it off the blog.

-Phil

By: brygenon

brygenon — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:22:59 +0000

Jacqlyn Smith came up with,

Exactly—That is why I didn’t respond..you already pre-judged them as “foolish” before even knowing what they said….

That’s not true Jacqlyn; you did respond. I could not have followed up and quoted you had you not. What you did not do was show what the senators and congressmen actually wrote in the replies that you called “foolish”.

so why would I waste my time on YOU??? You are the one who appears to be the FOOL

There there. Feel better after your e-tantrum?

By: Jacqlyn Smith

Jacqlyn Smith — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:02:34 +0000

Brygenon—–

It was not your actions and letters, Jacqlyn, that I asked about. I inquired on the letters of Senators and Congressmen, to see how they wasted their time to try to enlighten you.

*********************************************************************

Exactly—That is why I didn’t respond..you already pre-judged them as “foolish” before even knowing what they said…. so why would I waste my time on YOU??? You are the one who appears to be the FOOL!

“You can lead a liberal to the truth but you can’t make them think.” ~Unknown

By: brygenon

brygenon — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:38:10 +0000

Jacqlyn Smith wrote:

brygenon says: Who were those Senators and Congressmen, and what, specifically, did they say in those “foolish letters”?
Brygenon—-By your statement here it would be a waste of my time to enlighten you as to my actions….. it appears you have already pre-judged me and my letters!!

It was not your actions and letters, Jacqlyn, that I asked about. I inquired on the letters of Senators and Congressmen, to see how they wasted their time to try to enlighten you.

By: Jacqlyn Smith

Jacqlyn Smith — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 02:38:22 +0000

brygenon says:
April 5, 2009 at 4:37 am

Who were those Senators and Congressmen, and what, specifically, did they say in those “foolish letters”?

*******************************************************************

Brygenon—-By your statement here it would be a waste of my time to enlighten you as to my actions….. it appears you have already pre-judged me and my letters!!

By: Phil

Phil — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:11:10 +0000

Sue,

Go on, revolt. Take up your arms and kill innocent people. Shoot first and ask questions later.

I don’t think anyone is saying they’re actually going to do this. I think what people are doing is venting their frustrations over the current climate of DC.

-Phil

By: Phil

Phil — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:08:37 +0000

brygenon,

Members of the U.S. Congress, both Democratic and Republican — the people who actually have the power to remove the President — heard this complaint and treated it as nonsense. How strong a defense is that? Doesn’t matter. Here we’re considering it coming from the plaintiff.

“treated it as nonsense:” Except, I suppose, for Rep. Posey, who’s actually docketed a bill concerning presidential eligibility.

-Phil

By: Sue

Sue — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:41:54 +0000

“We will all go down in a blaze of glory to defend this country from the Usurper in Chief’s New World Order”

“I pray it doesn’t resort to bloodshed but I’ve been praying this same prayer since December 2008….some who are less spiritual may not have the same patience as me!!”

Yes, I think we should revolt. Totally weaken America. Then, the real enemy can walk in and take over. Makes sense to me. Destroy America when you could instead just vote the guy out in 4 years. Yes, revolting and riots make perfect sense. America would be the perfect target for the real enemy which by the way, is not Obama. Go on, revolt. Take up your arms and kill innocent people. Shoot first and ask questions later.