Report Released on Presidential Eligibility
Via Dr. Taitz’ site as well as EvilConservativeOnline, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment, Vice President of Protective Services, has released the following report regarding a current assessment surrounding the President’s eligibility.
I have emailed Dr. Rapacki to further follow up on this report and will be updating/posting as appropriate.
From the full report:
NOTE from Defend Our Freedoms Foundation Staff.
The below report states: “if Mr Obama fights unsealing his documentation…there will be civil unrest unleashed on the streets” InfraGrad has a Public Private Partnership with the FBI. The PPP programs has been leveraged heavily from local to international levels to render entities back into Panopolies. The term panopoly was coined by Joseph Borkin, chief economic advisor of the Anti-trust Division of the Department of Justice circa 1943, during his investigations of I.G. Farben because the aggregation of businesses were much larger than a monopoly or cartel. [Edit: InfraGrad should be InfraGard; panopoly should probably be panoply]
What is InfraGard?
InfraGard is a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) program that began in the Cleveland Field Office in 1996. It was a local effort to gain support from the information technology industry and academia for the FBI’s investigative efforts in the cyber arena. The program expanded to other FBI Field Offices, and in 1998 the FBI assigned national program responsibility for InfraGard to the former National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) and to the Cyber Division in 2003. InfraGard and the FBI have developed a relationship of trust and credibility in the exchange of information concerning various terrorism, intelligence, criminal, and security matters.
The report:
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Vice President of Protective Services
_______
Diplomate: Reply:
American Academy of Forensic Counselors Southwest Risk Advisors, Inc.
American Psychotherapy Association Post Office Box 1595
Chandler, Arizona 85244
Licensed Investigator Telecommunications:
Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent 1-866-481-7712 – office
Information Warfare Analyst 480-440-5930 – cell
ASIS – Phoenix Chapter Membership Chair LRapacki1@Hotmail.com
FBI InfraGard – Arizona
Memorandum: WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
NOT CLASSIFIED — PUBLIC DISSEMINATION
March the 16th, 2009
Statement of Purpose:
The content of this White Paper is deliberately intended to stimulate thought and discussion. Informational analysis comprising global security, national security of the United States of America, socio-political-economic forces as a dimension to national security, culture, freedom in human rights, defense and the rule of law are considered within the framework of this treatise.
Overview:
Beginning as campaign rhetoric, the question of Barak Obama’s legal status as a citizen of the United States of America qualified to serve as President, is moving toward a crescendo that might be heard formally by the United States Supreme Court. Downplayed by many, including U.S. Senators on the Republican side and even Senators serving on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee as late as Friday of last week, a significant meeting occurred last Thursday, March 12th in Idaho. The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court was speaking before a large audience (800 in attendance, including the President of the Idaho State Bar Association) on the character of Abraham Lincoln, when attorney Orly Taitz of Mission Viejo, California came to the microphone and asked the Chief Justice if he would personally review a legal brief and a complaint signed by over 325,000 American citizens as to the Constitutionality of Barak Obama’s swearing-in as President. Chief Justice Roberts personally agreed to review the legal brief and the complaint saying such in front of the audience.
_______
Motions to be heard on this critical Constitutional matter have been dismissed already, or not even accepted by courts in many states – New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Washington, Texas, North Carolina to name a few. But the issue will not go away; it is morphing now to include active members of the Armed Forces serving in “Hot Zones” or theatres of combat. The legal motion handed
WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
March the 16th, 2009
Continued – page two
_______
to the Chief Justice warns: “If MR. OBAMA is not constitutionally eligible to serve as President of the United States, then no act that he takes is, arguably, valid, the laws that he signs would not be valid, the protective orders that he signs would be null and void, and every act that he takes would be subject to legal challenge, both in the Courts of the United States of America, and in International Courts, and that, therefore, it is important for the voters to know whether he, or any candidate for President in the future, is eligible to serve in that office.”
Just prior to this meeting, attorney Taitz sent Certified Correspondence on February 27th to the U.S. Attorney General, the Director of the FBI, Congressional and Senatorial Judiciary Committee, et.al. with the stated purpose “demand for investigation and immediate action in regards suspected crimes” identified as, but not limited to: impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation of character, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into the computer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, forgery, using cyberspace for voter fraud. Military officers from all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces have joined in this action as Plaintiffs. Among the petitioners are: Maj. Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr. David Earl-Graef; police officer and Selected Reservist Navy Commander Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, U.S. Army now serving on active duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. TimothyComerford; Tenn. State Rep. Frank Nicely and others.
One of the “and others” is Harry Riley, a veteran who spent a significant time serving in the Pentagon. This former officer said the issue is basically over whether Americans will allow “the trashing” of their Constitution. “Myself, along with hundreds of thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S. Constitution. The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis. How can an individual become the Commander-in-Chief, or the president of the U.S., with questions regarding his constitutional qualifications?”
The complaint filed with the U.S. Attorney General (now in the hands of the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) requests “relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II to test his title to president before the Supreme Court.” This legal phrase essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama is using to act as president. This is the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. This legal right established in British common law 800 years ago and was recognized by the U.S. Founding Fathers to demand documentation that may prove – or disprove – Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president.
The complaint further states: “As president-elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as president elect, Respondent Obama failed to qualify per U.S. Constitution; articles II and I; amendment XX paragraph 3.”
_______
What follows is the Summary of the complaint filed by Orly Taitz, attorney in Mission Viejo, California. As you can imagine, the complaint is thorough and long. I have replicated sufficient
WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
March the 16th, 2009
Continued – page three
_______
passages so not to diminish the nature, spirit, scope or details of the complaint but conscious of time to read and length, I compiled the salient points in this complaint to save you from reading the 78 page document. I will further attest that Exhibits and articles of proof were also attached to the documents I reviewed. I will further attest the investigator working this case for attorney Taitz is a licensed Private Investigator in the State of California for the past twenty-five years, and prior to this, served twenty years as a Detective at New Scotland Yard. I will further attest that I have reviewed documents containing additional names not previously mentioned. Some of the names are active military and others are retired at Lt. Col. and above rank.
Should it be discovered Mr. Obama is ineligible, a constitutional crisis would ensue attempting to determine which of his executive branch orders should be valid. If, however, this case continues and Mr. Obama fights revealing his documentation, there are growing concerns of civil unrest, or worse, being unleashed in the streets of our nation. The economic crisis coupled with this type of a constitutional crisis could prove to be a “flashpoint” that would test conventional law enforcement and elements of homeland security.
_______
Summary of the Complaint submitted to U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.:
“Recently an active U.S. Army Officer, who is risking his life in defending our country in Iraq, joined my (attorney Taitz) legal action aimed at unsealing Barack Hussein Obama’s, aka Barry Soetoro’s, (Obama/Soetoro) legal status and eligibility/legitimacy for presidency of the U.S. The president needs to be a ‘natural born citizen – one who is born in the country to parents (plural, both) who arecitizens of this country.
This definition was recently unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate in Senate resolution 511, presented by Senator Leahy in April 2008, as Senator McCain sought his legitimacy for the presidency to be verified, and Mr. McCain therefore presented his long version original birth certificate.
Mr. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen; he was a citizen of Kenya here in the U.S. on a student visa, which by itself made Obama/Soetoro ineligible for presidency, regardless of whether he was born in this country or Kenya, or whether he later lost his U.S. citizenship while immigrating to Indonesia and obtaining Indonesian citizenship (by being adopted and naturalized), and later reaffirming his Indonesian citizenship while traveling on a Indonesian passport as an adult, and also most likely obtaining taxpayer funded financial aid as a Foreign Exchange student from Indonesia (Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and any U.S. citizenship would therefore have to be relinquished). Additionally, Obama/Soetoro’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, and the Ambassador from Kenya,
WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
March the 16th, 2009
Continued – page three
_______
Peter Ogego, made statements that he was born in Kenya, and there is no record of him being born in any hospital in Hawaii. HI Statute #338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth (COLB), and those can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only.
Additionally, Forensic Document expert Sandra Line has issued an affidavit that Obama’s place of birth cannot be ascertained without reviewing the original birth certificate. Dr. Chiymoi Fukimo, director of Health Department for the State of Hawaii, issued a statement that Obama has a birth certificate on file, but intentionally refused to provide clarification, whether it is a birth certificate for a foreign born child of a Hawaiian resident, whether it was prepared based on hospital records or statement of one relative only, or whether it is an amended birth certificate, created upon Obama/Soetoro’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro, his Indonesian stepfather, and showing him a citizen of Indonesia.
There are forensic questions raised about the short version Certification of Life Birth posted by Obama/Soetoro on his web site; lacking corroborating evidence such as name of the hospital, name of the doctor, three signatures and a seal on the front of the document.
Similarly, Obama/Soetoro supporters used Cyber space previously, in order to misinform and defraud American citizens and commit voter fraud. On November 3rd, a day before the National elections, when numerous voters questioned Obama/Soetoro’s Natural Born status and his refusal to provide his long version birth certificate, an article appeared on the Internet stating that a Virginia Judge reviewed Obama/Soetoro’s original birth certificate and found it to be valid, Obama/Soetoro to be a Natural Born citizen, and all legal actions to be frivolous (Exhibit). This whole case was manufactured, and Cyber space was used, to defraud American citizens….
I am also requesting an investigation into the financial dealings of Barack and Michele Obama. Please see attached list of over 100 addresses for Barack Obama and a 100 business addresses for Michele Obama. These are addresses obtained from a private investigator and an intelligence service. Obama/Soetoro’s addresses are connected to numerous different social security numbers. None of the 130 positions listed for Michelle and Barry or Barack H. Obama were listed on their disclosed tax returns. There has to be a corresponding search for each and every employer that is listed. If those are salaried positions then, there is massive tax fraud. And if those were campaign contributions over the allowed limits then, there is massive campaign contributions fraud, especially in light of over $300 million in
WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIED
PROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09
March the 16th, 2009
Continued – page four
_______
contributions that are unaccounted for. Which is it? What social security numbers were used?
As you stated in your speech on Martin Luther King Day, Americans should not be ‘cowards’, particularly when matters of race are concerned. I was not a coward and prepared this large dossier, so I hope you will not be a coward and instead order an expeditious completion of this investigation and its subsequent prosecution.”
Conclusion:
Accompanying this complaint is a petition calling for an appointment of a special prosecutor similar to the one appointed during Watergate. The fact that Obama has not ordered Hawaiian officials to release the document leaves doubt as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists. Similar concerns exist in Mr. Obama’s refusal to release student records from Occidental College in the early 80’s where he may have been a student under the name of Barry Soetero, attending the college on aid for foreign students.
The action handed to the Chief Justice is on behalf 120 military officers, many of high rank, and 9 state representatives. Purportedly the room was stunned and silent as attorney Taitz and Chief Justice Roberts engaged in an extremely brief exchange regarding these charges which led to the oral promise made by the Chief Justice to review them.
( END OF REPORT )
Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.
Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent
Information Warfare Analyst
FBI InfraGard – Arizona
0100 Hrs. m.s.t.
It’s important to understand that this is an assessment and that reports such as this are produced all the time regarding any kind of event for interested parties to better understand how to move forward. Nevertheless, the FBI is aware of this situation.
-Phil
brygenon,
There is no explanation, because the Chief Justice is not tasked with determining presidential eligibility; that is a Legislative matter, as I thought you would have known by now.
-Phil
Phil assigned me the task,
Have to decline your request there. The presidential oath is constitutionally mandated, but their is no requirement that the Chief Justice administer it.
Was there a point to this tangent, other than to distract people from the failure to explain why the chief justice would swear in an illegitimate president?
Nope, not me. I’m all about dealing with reality.
Phil,
“However, an officer is on record — via his email — as saying that he’s pursuing the matter.”
The officer on record, via his email appeared to imply that he was conducting the criminal investigation of President Obama in his “official capacity as a Beaumont police officer, possibly soliciting another Beaumont CID police officer to assist in the criminal investigation and using department resources to conduct the criminal investigation.” I simply contacted the Beaumont Police Department to find out if this was indeed factual. I have already posted their official response to me and the source of the information for verification.
“Maybe he’s using his personal time to do so, I don’t know.”
It is certainly his right to do so as a private citizen.
Letters-Blogs-Emails Relating To President Obama’s Eligibility
Note: What follows is a copy of letters and/or emails that I have sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor-US Attorney for the District of Columbia, my US Congressman, and US Senator and would like to share them with you, as a means of giving you some ideas of what action you could hopefully take to join this urgent, time sensitive and worthy cause, by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our Constitution – You Decide:
**Copy of letter sent to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia:
“March 20, 2009
Mr. Jeffrey Taylor
U.S. Attorney For The District of Columbia
United States Attorney’s Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Re: President Barack H. Obama’s Eligibility To Be Our President
Dear Mr. Taylor:
As a Citizen of the United States of America and a retired Marine Corps Officer, I have the deepest concern for the safety and security of our country.
The fact is that there is a need for this nation to hear and resolve the issue of Barack H. Obama’s eligibility for office. I base this statement on the Constitutional requirement (Section 1, Article 2 of the US Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States) calling for the President to retain a special status of Natural Born Citizen in order to qualify for eligibility to that office, I have reviewed the definition of Natural Born Citizen as written in the Federal Papers by Justice John Jay. This definition of citizenship goes back centuries!
Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President! It is a fact that Obama was born a subject of the British Crown. He openly admits his father is a British Subject at the time of his birth.
Here are several references to the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. I implore you, URGENTLY, to investigate on your own:
• 1758 Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” –The Framers relied on many of the principles to write the Constitution.
• 1787-1788 The Federalist Papers, including Justice John Jay’s letter to George Washington.
• Article II, Section I, United States Constitution.
• The Naturalization Act of 1790-repeal of “Natural Born” from the 1790 Act in 1795.
• The Framers of the 14th Amendment-(citizenship granted, not Natural Born Citizenship); Rep. John Bingham and Sen. Lyman Trumball define Natural Born Citizen.
• Congressional Hearing on Dual Citizenship, 2005, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” discussion .
Our Nation is at grave risk. This issue MUST be addressed. Citizens across this nation, to include myself, are asking this question: Is Obama qualified to be our President and Commander in Chief. The public protests are beginning.
There is a significant movement and it is spreading like an impassioned grassfire. To assume it will go away is foolhardy. Furthermore, the usurpation of our Constitution threatens the very survival of our Union!
Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, and now our loyal service men and woman are in personal jeopardy!
The survival of our nation is at stake. This issue will not go away.
For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the United States. As an American Citizen and a retired military Veteran, I implore you to please Issue a Quo Warranto to provide The USA citizenry an answer to this constitutionally vital question.
Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto:
• The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person.
• Two individuals have authority to bring quo warranto action: Attorney General Eric Holder, and US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Jeffrey Taylor.
• Only one of these officials need bring the action in quo warranto.
• The federal quo warranto statute provides the only Constitutional means by which a sitting President may be removed by the Judicial branch.
• Congress has provided for the removal of a sitting President found to be ineligible by enacting the federal quo warranto statute.
• Nowhere in the Constitution does it give the Judicial Branch the power to remove a sitting President. The Constitution has provided congress with the authority to remove the president from office in cases other than impeachment.
• Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 6. “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge…”. Note the word “or”.
• Congress is authorized to exercise removal power by the 25th Amendment – and such power must be derived directly from Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6.
• SCOTUS is not a trier of fact and so quo warranto MUST be brought before the District Court for the District of Columbia EXACTLY as the statute requires.
• Quo warranto action is proper to settle title to the office of President for the good of the nation.
• Even if both officials are convinced Obama is eligible, it’s still proper for them to institute a quo warranto proceeding because the evidence emerging now is that, by leaving the controversy as is, a floodgate of litigation will ensue.
• The best possible candidates who should request the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to bring an action in quo warranto on their own motion are Retired Military officers who understand the absolute need for the President’s title to office not to be encumbered by doubt.
THREE WAYS TO BRING QUO WARRANTO:
1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion – which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.
2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as “third persons” and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.
3. If the Government will not give consent, then “interested persons” may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be – according to SCOTUS in Newman – restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.
CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.
For your information, I have also taken the liberty to include the following web sites, which will hopefully provide you with other evidence relating to this issue, that I believe support my concerns.. This evidence was meticulously put together by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo Ca 92691, ph-949-683-5411 fax 949-586-2082 and some were shared with Mr. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, Main 202-514-2000, Attorney General 202-353-1555, http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/ on or about February 27, 2009 and hand delivered to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts on or about March 12, 2009:
Open Letter From Brigadier General Charles Jones: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 4, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/05/open-letter-from-brigadier-general-charles-jone.aspx
Col. Riley-Former Division Chief National Security Agency Joins Our Action: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 23, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/23/col-riley-former-division-chief-national-security-agency-joins-our-action-2.aspx
Major General-Commanding General Carroll D. Childers Joins Military Suit : Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 24, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/24/major-general-commanding-general-carroll-d-childers-joins-military-suit.aspx
Motion to Reconsider Lightfoot V Bowen:Hand Delivered To U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts: Hand Delivered and Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 12, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.org/motiontoreconsiderLightfootvBowen.htm
Dossiers and Getting The Word Out: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/dossiers-and-getting-the-word-out.aspx
Dr. Orly Taitz’s Interview By Rollye James: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/orly-taitzs-interview-by-rollye-james.aspx
This is a Chalice Radio Talk Show interview with Mr. Leo Donofrio, which I also took the liberty of sharing with you, as a means of providing you with more background information relating to this issue:
The Chalice Show – Leo Donofrio Live: On March 18, 2009:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/PatriotsHeartNetwork/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/03/19/The-Chalice-Show-Leo-Donofrio-Live
I have also attached a copy of my resume for your review.
Please let me know if you have any questions on this time sensitive and urgent issue.
Disclaimer: Although I share numerous resources with you, as a means of supporting my concerns, it does not necessarily mean that I support and/or agree with the contents of all of them, word-by-word, but find them thought provoking because, they provide me with other views besides my own and, thereby, help me make my case.
As a retired Marine Corps Veteran Officer (Mustang), I pride myself with loving my God, family, friends and my country. Those Military and/or Veteran Comrades, that I am honored to call friends, know that I would never intentionally say or do anything that would hurt or demean anyone, to include my God and Country.
I have always preached to my own family and follow the rule of “filtering everything that comes from my brain through my heart before it comes out of my mouth” and this rule has done me well for almost 62 years of my life and would highly recommend it to anyone that dares to share their own views with others, knowing that they may not have the same views, but are able and willing to accept that and not take it personal.
I also consider the sharing of these concerns to be given me under our “FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS”, which I consider as one of the corner stones of our “Constitution’s 1st Amendment,” and, as an American Citizen, I believe that it is my “God Given Duty” to stand up for and defend this or any other rights given me under our Constitution, as other God and Country loving Americans in uniform have done in the past and continue to this date.
I seek your immediate response to my grave concern.
God Bless You & God Bless America.
Respectfully,
Jacobo L. Martinez
Captain-USMC-Retired
Albuquerque, NM 87123-3798
Enl: Copy of My Resume.
**Copy of letter sent to our NM US Congressman, Heinrich:
“Dear Congressman Heinrich:
As a retired Marine Corps Officer, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for all your hard work and selfless dedication to our country, both as a former member of our Armed Forces and now as our Congressman.
I realize that I may be taking a risk by sharing my recent blog with you, but my intuition tells me that I can trust you with this information, which has been receiving more and more attention and is literally keeping me up at night:
http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/23/ltr_to_mr_jeffrey_taylor-us_attorney_for_district_of_columbia.thtml
I gracefully ask for and would greatly appreciate your feedback on this issue.
Since I am not an attorney, I just want to make sure that I took the appropriate action of sending a letter to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia, asking for his assistance on this issue, knowing that I may not even get a response from him, but I felt a strong need to stand up for and defend our nation’s Constitution, which I, like many other Americans, believe is under attack by this administration so, after some intense research, I took the leap.
Note: As a military Veteran, I normally don’t listen to conspiracies, but my gut tells me that something smells here and I hope and pray that you can take some time out of your busy schedule to review and comment on this issue. I have also attached a copy of my resume for your review, which is included in my blog.
Looking forward to hearing from you on this, what I believe to be, urgent and time sensitive issue.
Have a great day and keep up the great work and selfless dedication to our great country.
Thanks again.
Semper Fi!
Jake”
**Copy of letter sent to our NM US Senator, Tom Udall:
“Dear Honorable Tom Udall:
As a retired Marine Corps Officer (Mustang), I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for all your hard work and selfless dedication to our country, as evidenced by your many years of untiring work for our NM Veterans’ benefits, both as our former US Congressman and now as our US Senator.
I realize that I may be taking a big risk by sharing a copy of my attached letter with you, but, after years of working with you indirectly through your Santa Fe office staff, while employed as the Santa Fe Veterans’ Service Officer, where I was honored to have the opportunity of assisting those Veterans and/or their families that resided in the Santa Fe and Rio Arriba Counties, I believe that you are someone I can trust with this information, which has been receiving more and more attention by the American public and is literally keeping me up at night:
I gracefully ask for and would greatly appreciate your feedback on this issue.
Since I am not an attorney, I just want to make sure that I took the appropriate action of sending a letter to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia, asking for his assistance on this issue, knowing that I may not even get a response from him, but I felt a dire need to stand up for and defend our nation’s Constitution, which I, like many other Americans around the country, believe is under attack by this administration, although I am a registered democrat so, after some prayers and intense research, I took the leap.
Note: As a military Veteran, I’ve always prided myself as being intelligent, extremely level headed and normally don’t listen to conspiracies, but my gut tells me that something smells here and I hope and pray that you can take some time out of your busy schedule to review and comment on this issue. A copy of my resume is attached to my letter for your review.
Looking forward to hearing from you concerning this, what I believe to be, urgent and time sensitive issue.
Bottom Line: I truly hope and pray that my and other American’s concerns are unfounded, but, if they are not: “God Bless Our USA.”
Have a great day and keep up the great work and selfless dedication to our NM Veterans and our great country.
Respectfully.
Jacobo L. Martinez
Captain, USMC-Ret.
Att: Letter to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia
Note: What follows are blog comments that I have also posted on Defend Our Freedoms, National Conference On Barack Obama and The Jag Hunter and would like to share them with you, as a means of providing you some ideas of what action you could hopefully take to join this urgent, time sensitive and worthy cause, by standing up for and defending those rights given us under our Constitution – You Decide:
**Blog comment posted on LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III’s blog and on Defend Our Freedoms:
Comment Posted On: The JAG Hunter…Dauntless and unafraid! On March 17, 2009:
http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/
Here is my blog comment:
Posted a Comment On: The JAG Hunter…Dauntless and unafraid! On March 26, 2009:
“Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
As a retired Marine Corps Officer (Mustang), I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your selfless dedication to our country, as a former member of our nation’s Armed Forces and for having the fortitude to stand up for and defend our Constitution, like many other freedom fighters before you.
I would also like to take the opportunity to share a copy of my recent blog, which contains a copy of my letter, that I recently forwarded to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia, on this issue:
http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/23/ltr_to_mr_jeffrey_taylor-us_attorney_for_district_of_columbia.thtml
I am not an attorney, but I felt a dire need to stand up for and defend our nation’s Constitution, which I, as many other Americans around the country, believe is under attack by this President and his administration so, after some prayers and intense research, I took the leap like you did.
For your information, I have also forwarded a copy of my blog to our US Senator, US Congressman, AG and our County Sheriff for their review and, hopefully, action.
Additionally, I have also joined Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. at dr_taitz@yahoo.com , as a plaintiff in her case to force President Obama to produce evidence of his “Natural Born Status” and would urge you to consider doing the same because, she has shown the relentless fortitude to stand up for and defend our Constitution.
Note: As a military Veteran, I’ve always prided myself as being intelligent, level headed and normally don’t listen to conspiracies, but my gut tells me that something smells here. A copy of my resume is attached to my blog for your review.
Bottom Line: I truly hope and pray that our concerns are unfounded, but, if they are not: “God Bless Our USA.”
Have a great day and keep up the great work and selfless dedication to our great country.
Semper Fi!
Jacobo L. Martinez
Captain, USMC-Ret.”
**Blog comment posted on National Conference On Barack Obama:
“WeroInNM said…
Dear Mr. Martin: As a retired Marine Corps Officer, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for all your hard work on this urgent issue and for your selfless dedication to our country, which inspires all us to take action. I would also like to take the liberty of sharing my recent blog on this issue: http://WeroInNM.blogtownhall.com/2009/03/23/ltr_to_mr_jeffrey_taylor-us_attorney_for_district_of_columbia.thtml I gracefully ask for and would greatly appreciate your feedback on my blog. Since I am not an attorney, I just want to make sure that I took the appropriate action by sending a letter to Mr. Jeffrey Taylor, US Attorney for the District of Columbia asking for his assistance on this issue knowing that I may not even get a response from him, but I felt that I needed to take some action so, after some intense research on my own, I took the leap. Have a great day. Thanks again. Semper Fi! Jake
MARCH 23, 2009 7:44 AM”
“ Food For Thought”
“God Bless Our USA”
Semper Fi!
Jake
Sue,
From an official standpoint, I stand corrected. However, an officer is on record — via his email — as saying that he’s pursuing the matter. Maybe he’s using his personal time to do so, I don’t know.
-Phil
Phil,
“Incorrect. They recommended that investigations having to do with the President should occur at the federal level. They never said that the President wasn’t being investigated at the local level.”
Actually, the Beaumont Police Department DID say that the President was NOT being investigated at the local level.
Here is the webpage to the Beaumont Police Department. Ask for Assistant Chief of Police Weldon Dunlap. Here is his statement to me and he said I could quote him. But, you are more than welcome to call him and verify this information for yourself.
http://www.beaumontpd.com/
Beaumont Police Department Website.
Statement by Assistant Chief of Police Weldon Dunlap.
“The Beaumont Police Department is not investigating the President. If anyone has criminal evidence on the President, they should contact the federal law enforcement authorities and make their evidence available to those authorities.”
brygenon,
Cite the Article/Section/Clause in the Constitution that expressly gives the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court any authorization for establishing eligibility of the President.
Furthermore, you seem to be suggesting that the Judiciary must now step into the Legislative in determining said eligibility; I thought that “illegitimizers” like yourself were for separation of powers?
-Phil
MGB somehow convinced himself,
That guy who swore Obama in as president (twice!) is Chief Justice of the United States, A.K.A. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Do you think the Constitution does not matter to John G. Roberts? Or perhaps that the Chief Justice needs your instruction on interpreting it? Or maybe that Roberts thought “SO wonderful” a senator who voted *against* his confirmation.
It seems to me that our constitution is being trashed in many ways and it is time we stand up and be counted. If you are interested take time to go to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA&feature=channel_page
It is time we stand for something or we will have no freedom to enjoy
You know what I would like to see?
You O-bots who are tasked to monitor this blog: Show us ONE SCINTILLA of intellectual honesty, for a change.
Or is this too far above your pay grade?
Oh, I forgot. You don’t get paid to do this. You’re volunteers.
How “gullible” are O-bots who persist in believing that he IS eligible under the Constitution?
Or is it that they believe that it doesn’t matter, anyway, because who gives a rat’s ass about the Constitution? He’s SO wonderful that NO law should apply to him. He’s the messiah, after all.
“I can definitely go along with the second statement, which is completely different from what you claimed in the first.”
Polarik’s original credentials
“I’ve been working with computers, printers, and typewriters for over 20 years, and given a set of printed letters, I can discern what kind of device made them. Printer output is quite different from the text created by a graphics program, and even if a document looks “official,” it may not be.”
Polarik has since claimed to have a Ph.D. in Instructional Media then a Masters in Statistics.
He’s full of it.
a bad day in general for Dr. Taitz, Esquire.
>>>how so? The guy probably didn’t even know there was an issue in the first place, give her the benefit of the doubt? She will get back to him in a month, or sooner, and if he still has no answers then the proverbial shit will hit the proverbial fan and people will get pissed off even more than they are now.
HistorianDude,
I would not concur. All that we have in hand at the moment is that she made some statements.
Incorrect. They recommended that investigations having to do with the President should occur at the federal level. They never said that the President wasn’t being investigated at the local level.
While you’re certainly free to construe a “no response” on the part of the Director as a “bad day in general” for Dr. Taitz, the truth of the matter is that he simply gave no response. He did not say the issue was meritless nor did he say that he would necessarily pursue the issue any further.
Considering this comment is per the Report recently released, I have seen nothing, to date, on WorldNetDaily covering this issue. Therefore, as I’ve said before, regardless of whether the messenger, per se, is not who he says he is, the report is factual in the summation of eligibility events to date.
-Phil
So…. based on this frustrated outburst…
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/25/indictments.aspx
… I guess its safe to say that Orly did not get the answers she wanted from SCOTUS, from AG Holder, or from Senator Kyl. The Sheriff’s Office in Beaumont, TX has explicitly disavowed any investigation of Obama whatsoever in multiple e-mails. The Director of Selective Service basically listened to Orly’s tales and gave no response whatsoever… a bad day in general for Dr. Taitz, Esquire.
How do you predict WND is gonna spin this Phil? How will you?
“Are folks really this gullible?”
Yep, think so. And this isn’t the first time.
sus,
I bet I know of someone in a really, really, really high position in this country that has a shadier past!
-Phil
Obot 1024,
Do you now see the difference between your two statements?
versus
I can definitely go along with the second statement, which is completely different from what you claimed in the first.
-Phil
Obot 1024,
Sheesh — that was totally whacked on my part. Thanks for that.
-Phil
News Flash:
Steve Pidgeon OK will be on tonight:
Patriot Heart’s Network 8pm
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/PatriotsHeartNetwork/PatriotsHeartNetwork
And possibly Plains Radio Network 10 pm
http://www.plainsradio.com/
This comment is NOT CLASSIFIED.
He leaves out the forged Selective Service registration, which is prominently featured in Taitz’s current briefings and dossiers. That’s one of the best bits, since it came directly from the Selective Service and thus faking it requires a government conspiracy with far-reaching tentacles.
NOT CLASSIFIED
Reviewed and approved for PUBLIC DISSEMINATION
AnotherReader wrote,
I predict it will go away. This is a fringe theory with a time limit, if only because of the Twenty-Second Amendment.