NH State Rep Consents to be Plaintiff in Upcoming Lawsuit
Submitted by Phil on Mon, Mar 16, 20095 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz is reporting that New Hampshire State Representative Larry Rappaport has agreed to be one of more than 100 Plaintiffs in an upcoming lawsuit designed to order the President to unseal his vital documentation:
10th State Representative, NH State Representative Larry Rappaport joined our action. Not only that, but he is bringing the PostMaster-high ranked Federal Employee with him.
Other Plaintiffs in the upcoming lawsuit include the following:
- New Hampshire (1 State Rep)
- Tennessee (4 State Reps)
- Oklahoma (unverified 1 State Rep)
- Missouri (2 State Reps)
- Army:
- Sgt. Matthew Edwards (National Guard)
- Major General Carroll D. Childers P.E. [Professional Engineer] (Retired)
- 1st Lt. Scott Easterling
- Col. Harry Riley, NSA (Retired)
- Navy:
- Air Force:
- Sergeant Harold Abrams (Retired)
- Staff Sergeant Paul Murphy, Deputy Sheriff (Inactive)
- Lt. Col. Chuck Miller (Retired)
- Marines:
- Anonymous Officer
- 1st Sergeant William Shires (Retired)
- Mark Loaiza (Retired Officer)
A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
-Phil
Orly Taitz never filed anything. She is only licensed for the state of California, so what she claims to do is beyond the scope of her abilities. Please quit watching her blog for results and check with those entities she claims she filed with.
Will it be successful? I am not sure, not sure where politics is heading at?
She needs to keep the troops as John Doe’s and she should be able to get a lot more. She also needs to find a for JAG attorney to run the case instead of her running the case.
I am ready with my evidence hell I think I could prove that
barry is not eligible to serve the great american citizens.
When (not if) Obama has to answer for his crimes in a court of law, can the news media be found culpable and complicit if it can be proven that for over a year they had been provided the same evidence and had ignored it and chose not to inform the voting public? If so, can the concerned citizens who can provide documented proof of transmittal of such evidence be a plaintiff and seek monetary damages or would it have to be a class action suit brought on behalf of the American people as a whole?