2008 Election

This is where the action is regarding President-elect Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility

2010 Election

Will the Dems lose their majorities by November 2, 2010?

Initiatives

American reform has always started from the bottom, up. Track various State-based reformation initiatives here

Money

It makes the world go around, especially DC and Wall Street

Qualifications

Who’s checking up on officeholder eligibility? Find out here

Home » Activism, South Dakota, States' Rights, Tenth Amendment

South Dakota House Passes State Sovereignty Resolution 51-18; Immediately Moved to Senate

Submitted by Phil on Thu, Mar 5, 20096 Comments
South Dakota House Passes State Sovereignty Resolution 51-18; Immediately Moved to Senate

Per the LibertyFile.com blog, the South Dakota House adopted the resolution (per status page):

 HCR 1013: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Reasserting sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers and serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates.

Rep. Steele moved that HCR 1013 as found on pages 579 and 580 of the House Journal be adopted.

The question being on Rep. Steele’s motion that HCR 1013 be adopted.

And the roll being called:

Yeas 51, Nays 18, Excused 1, Absent 0

Yeas:
Bolin; Boomgarden; Brunner; Carson; Cronin; Curd; Cutler; Deadrick; Dreyer; Engels; Faehn; Gibson; Gosch; Greenfield; Hamiel; Hoffman; Hunt; Iron Cloud III; Jensen; Juhnke; Kirkeby; Kopp; Krebs; Lange; Lederman; Lust; McLaughlin; Moser; Noem; Novstrup (David); Olson (Betty); Olson (Ryan); Peters; Pitts; Rausch; Romkema; Rounds; Russell; Schlekeway; Sly; Solum; Steele; Street; Tidemann; Turbiville; Van Gerpen; Vanneman; Verchio; Wink; Wismer; Speaker Rave

Nays:
Blake; Burg; Dennert; Elliott; Fargen; Feickert; Feinstein; Frerichs; Hunhoff (Bernie); Killer; Kirschman; Lucas; Nygaard; Schrempp; Solberg; Sorenson; Thompson; Vanderlinde

Excused:
Putnam

HCR1013 has been calendered for Senate consideration today:

HCR 1013: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Reasserting sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers and serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates.

Was read the first time, the President waived the referral to committee, and placed HCR 1013 on the calendar of Thursday, March 5, the 33rd legislative day.

The South Dakota Legislature web site has yet to publish the Senate version.

A current listing of State-based initiatives can be found here.

-Phil

6 Comments »

  • Keeping it Real says:

    Maybe you should pass a resolution about recieving any federal money since that’s not in the constitution either…grow up and be productive and get something done in the house other than pretending Obama’s so terrible…Maybe you should’ve been this hard on Bush when he was lieing us into war…yeah that’s pro-life…GET A CLUE!!!

  • Copied from the SD Legislative page: 03/05/2009 Senate Concurred in Resolution, Passed, YEAS 20, NAYS 14. S.J. 642

  • We don’t want to be more crowded here in SD. We like the fact that we have no crime, we don’t have to constantly watch our backs, our kids can play safely outside, and that our version of ‘gang violence’ involves high school kids and toilet papering houses.

  • mikethom1 says:

    This is wonderful. Hopefully, it will pass in the SD Senate also. The next step would be to develop a strategy that will 1)refuse to recognize federal authority in some matter not assigned to the federal government in the Constitution, and 2)assert the state’s claim to their portion of the tax dollars that the federal government is distributing for that purpose to other states.

  • JeffM says:

    Excellent. So far, it’s looking like South Dakota and Oklahoma are about to get a lot more crowded. LOL.

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.