VA REAL ID Bill Readied for Governor’s Signature
From a concerned citizen:
The state of Virginia has one also and has been signed by both the house and senate and is now on to the Governor to be signed. It is bill HB1587. This bill prohibits the Real ID as issued by the government and Virginia will not participate in it!It has passed in the HOUSE and the SENATE already.
House vote 88-10
Senate vote 39-10Now it has to be signed or vetoed by the Governor.He has two weeks.
A current listing of State-based initiatives can be found here.
Here is the text of the bill…
HOUSE BILL NO. 1587
House Amendments in [ ] – February 9, 2009
A BILL to authorize the Commonwealth’s lack of participation in the compliance of any provision of the Real ID Act.
———-Patron Prior to Engrossment–Delegate Marshall, R.G.
———-Referred to Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety
———-Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. § 1. Participation in the Real ID Act of 2005.
A. For purposes of this Act, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this Act except in those instances where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
“Biometric data” means information relating to a biological characteristic of an individual that makes that individual unique from any other individual, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Fingerprints, palm prints, and other means for measuring or recording ridge pattern or fingertip characteristics.
2. Facial feature pattern characteristics.
3. Behavior characteristics of a handwritten signature, such as shape, speed, pressure, pen angle, or sequence.
4. Voice data used for comparing live speech with a previously created speech model of an individual’s voice.
5. Iris recognition data containing color or texture patterns or codes.
6. Keystroke dynamics, measuring pressure applied to key pads.
7. Hand geometry, measuring hand characteristics, including the shape and length of fingers, in three dimensions.
8. Retinal scans, reading through the pupil to measure blood vessels lining the retina.
9. Deoxyribonucleic acid or ribonucleic acid.
“Economic privacy” means the privacy of an individual that relates to a right, privilege, or reasonable expectation that certain information is required by law to be held confidential or is otherwise considered to be confidential to that individual, including, but not limited to:
1. Information included in a tax return required by law to be filed with the federal, state, or local government.
2. Information on financial transactions conducted by or on behalf of the individual.
3. Information on investment transactions conducted by or on behalf of the individual.
“Real ID Act of 2005″ means Division B of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005 (Public Law 109-13, 119 Stat. 302).
B. Neither the Governor nor the Department of Motor Vehicles nor any other agency of the Commonwealth shall participate in the compliance of any provision of the Real ID Act of 2005 [ and any other federal law, regulation, or policy ] that would compromise the economic privacy or biometric data of any resident of the Commonwealth.
-Phil










Yes you are correct about the koolaid drinking Governor. We do have him, sad to say that man got elected. I had heard he was offered a position running the DNC, I don’tknow why he hasn’t gone away yet.
The numbers were very strong on who voted against it. If the Gov does veto it, it is possible that our house and senate can override the Govs veto and push it into law. Virginians will be pushing them too should the Gov not sign it.
I’ll keep you up-to-date on the status of this.
Also, you can always copy that bill and send it to your own representatives asking them to follow suit. I am learning that if it is already prepared for them they do it quicker, lol.
ihv>>if he does not sign it or reject it, isnt the state like most and the us gov…. where a 2/3 majority can override his veto? seems that the original vote will be enough to guarantee passage
unless some voted for it knowing the governor would veto
will
NewEnglandPatriot,
Don’t get too excited just yet…Va has a koolaid drinking governor that needs to sign the bill. I will wait with baited breath.
I think I’m going to move to one of these states that has a backbone. Great idea to opt out of REAL ID. I’ve already contacted my state rep about how bad I think it is, but I doubt anything will be done. In Connecticut, the state feeds at the trough of big government. Even though my state rep is good, I doubt she can battle all the libs in the legislature.
It’s no longer a question of liberal or conservative; it’s socialist vs. constitutionalist. That’s how I’m thinking of it now.
Real ID was signed by Bush in 2005 and suppose to take
effect May 2008……..
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249900,00.html
http://epic.org/privacy/id-cards/real_id_act.pdf
So if the bill had been passed by O, you are saying we in Virginia would be racist for objecting to it? I think the state of our Union has nothing to do with party affiliations or prejudice to any race. I think it has to do with the people of this nation getting tired of government trying to take away our liberties.
Maybe I misunderstood your statement so please do clairfy for us. Thanks.
Since that bill was passed under W, Virginia is not being prejudice toward any race or party affiliation only distancing themselves from the Mark of the Beast