TN Representative Agrees to be Plaintiff on Eligibility, Proposes Sovereignty Bill
Submitted by Phil on Tue, Feb 10, 200981 Comments
According to Dr. Taitz’ site, Tennessee Rep. Eric Swafford (R) has agreed to be a Plaintiff in a legal action demanding that the President proves his eligibility.
It is also being reported that yesterday Mr. Swafford introduced a State sovereignty bill in the Tennessee legislature.
A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
A current listing of State-based initiatives can be found here.
-Phil
1Lishell is blowing smoke. Ignore him/her.
[...] proving that he was, if fact, born in the U.S. and at no point renounced his citizenship. Now, a member of our Tennessee legislature is among the conspiracy [...]
Jackie,
Post the westlaw number for the “Illinois Law Review” article you mentioned. If you have evidence of a disciplinary action, show it.
Hers was court ordered and it doesn’t say why….you can choose to spin it anyway you want…I have heard and read various reasons why it was court ordered none of which are what you state….however how would anyone know when the O’s have sealed all pertinent information about themselves!! His is inactive because if he hadn’t made it inactive they were going to court order his as well. The reasons are concealed so nobody knows….not even YOU!!! I can make you reasons just as well as you can!
Yes it was court ordered and therefore what you are citing is made up because it doesn’t say why it was court ordered…that is just your SPIN!!
1Lishell— You say—–”Murder also destabilizes society, by violating the state’s monopoly on force. Again, if your workforce is constantly killing each other, you’re going to be looking elsewhere for a factory.”
Exactly—-why are we allowing mothers to murder their offspring??? It is destabilizing our society!!! Think about all the brillant people who have been callously thrown away like garbage….truly immoral!!!
Phil,
With the exception of solicitation (I assume you’re referring to soliciting prostitution as opposed to soliciting hitmen or bribes), all of those have policy rationales beyond morality.
Ethics laws and bribery, for instance, have economic rationales. Societies with rampant corruption are unstable, impoverished societies-no business is going to invest in a society where laws are not going to be enforced neutrally or where kickbacks and graft are required.
Murder also destabilizes society, by violating the state’s monopoly on force. Again, if your workforce is constantly killing each other, you’re going to be looking elsewhere for a factory.
Tn Rep Eric swafford, along with 3 other TN State Reps and 1 TN State Senator.. have signed individually that consent form.
3 of these 5 will be on air this Friday at 6pm on plainsradio.com, along with Dr. Mike Ritze, OK State Rep; and Timothy Comeford, NH State Rep
Sopeaking of States’ sovereignty bills, citixzenship bills, and very likely on the subject of Obam’a hidden documents: 1961 birth certificate, passports, etc…
In the last paragraph, it should read “I know it says court ordered inactive status.”
Are you talking about the University of Illnois Law Review? I just searched for “Michelle Obama” and license on Westlaw and didn’t find anything.
If you’re talking about some other law review, please give me the WL number and I’ll post it here for everyone to see.
Take a look at the Illinois Attorney Registry & Disciplinary Council website for Michelle Obama. It states that her license is voluntarily inactive. It also says no disciplinary history.
https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=606448531
If she had lost her license, it would say “Disbarred” or suspended or otherwise note that.
And, yes, I know it says court ordered involuntary status, but at the time Michelle Obama went on inactive status, attorneys who voluntarily went on inactive status had to petition the court for permission.
http://www.iardc.org/rule770inactivestatus.html
Sue,
You said, “You cannot legislate morality.”
I guess you’re going to have to ignore all those pesky laws in the United States about murder, solicitation, ethics, bribery, etc. These are all morality-based laws. Therefore, someone’s morality is obviously the standard here.
-Phil
If I were running for Prez I would let 1 Lishell see any and all pertinent documentation as required by the Constitution in order for me to hold that position before being placed on the ballot in any and all States. Birth Cert., passports you can interview my parents
, people I grew up with you can even go down to
Vital Records and look at a vault copy of BC. But that probably wouldn’t be good enough for you because I refuse to
be a lazy dictator who hasn’t worked an honest day in his life.
GeorgetownJD made a very important observation concerning the “Motion to Dismiss” and the footnote to the COLB. I can’t recall his exact statement but the gist of it was that the attorney would have never done that if the “COLB” wasn’t valid. And I believe his statement was made on this website. Found it!
GeorgetownJD statement:
“Suffice it to say, if they assert that the online COLB demonstrates that Obama was born in Honolulu, they have actual, admissible evidence to back it up. They are not required, at this point in the proceedings, to produce it.”
“Please explain to me why he should not be required to make available his birth certificate to be examined. A simple question. Why should he not have to prove his eligibility?”
Because he already has. That is why. Instead of believing what others tell you and repeating it, why don’t you try researching the information for yourself? You just might be surprised what you might learn. Below are two websites that have actually done all the research for you. All you have to do is read, then validate what you read–valid sources are also provided.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/
Obama Conspiracy Theories
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/
What’s Your Evidence?
Sue—I beg to differ with you…It is your statements and belief that your opinion is the right one and you and you alone know all the facts…when indeed you have not studied the “messiah” like we have…otherwise you would be demanding the truth and for the “chosen one” to unseal all of his documents immediately!!!
“Orly and Berg are getting closer as is Vieira.”
Yep, they are really getting closer:
“Hollister Update
FYI, Berg filed a First Amended Complaint on Feb. 9 (when his opposition to the motion to dismiss was due).”
“Today, Feb. 11, the Judge issued the following order:
“Plaintiff’s amended complaint [#11] adds nothing to the original complaint except rhetoric and legal theory and creates no obligation upon the defendants to respond to it. Nor is the amended complaint responsive to defendants’ motion to dismiss [#9], opposition to which was due on 2/9/09. Unless points and authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss are filed by 2/13/09, the motion will be treated as conceded and granted. It is SO ORDERED.”
You are in LA LA LAND…it is posted on the Illinois Law Review. Her law license was taken away for who knows what reason….They both have seemed to seal all their documents that would inform the public about who they are. I do know one thing…..all of their rhetoric and actions point to their ANTI-AMERICAN tendencies!!!
Sue—-You certainly don’t know much about the “chosen one” and his wifie…who just recently became proud to be an American. Yes it is a fact that neither one can practice law in Illinois…that is their home state and where they HAD a law license. Before you go spouting off you should find out what the H— you are talking about!!! I suggest you go check yourself out…you seem to have some sort of complex. Do you have that warm feeling up your leg??? Maybe you need to visit the ladies room!!
Jackie Smith,
And you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Jackie Smith,
I didn’t call him a name. And that was MY opinion which I have a right to have same as you have a right to have yours. Anybody who would co-sponsor a bill to “outlaw dildos” when there are a jillion other more important issues that his State has, can’t be the “brightest crayon in the box.” You cannot legislate morality.
http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2006/03/lawmakers-r-seek-to-outlaw-dildos.html
Lawmakers (R) Seek to Outlaw Dildos
“Apparently, lawmakers in this impoverished red state can’t find enough serious problems to address, so they’ve turned their minds to sex, specifically sex toys.”
“For unknown reasons, State Senator Charlotte Burks (DINO) and State Rep. Eric Swafford (R) have been thinking a lot about the activities going on your bedroom. They have come to the conclusion that Tennessee will be a better place to live if the state regulates your bedroom by outlawing dildos.”
Inactive doesn’t equal “lost their law licenses”. Many people with professional licenses will have them go inactive if they’re not practicing – because it can be very expensive and time-consuming to maintain an active license if one isn’t using it, and an utter pain in the rear to get relicensed if the license has expired.
Both Barack Obama and Michelle Obama have inactive law licenses. Which means that, should either of them decide to go back into the practice of law, reactivation would be a matter of maintaining insurance and taking any required ongoing education classes to make sure they’re up to date with changes in the law since they went inactive.
*Losing* ones license is the result is discipline, and is noted and stated as such in that person’s profile.
One can also be denied a law license due to psychological problems. Case in point, Andy Martin, while he has a JD, was denied a license to practice law due to those problems.
It seems to me that Sue & 1Lishell are playing devils advocate or they will rather live in a dictatorship world without any truth needed to be shown or told, just do as they say.
Anyone fighting so disparately for the truth not to be shown for the highest position in the our country don’t deserve the rights and freedoms of our bill of rights & constitution themselves.
Seems like Obama is putting in his big guns to these sights to save his being non transparent to keep the truth hidden.
The Truth will Prevail…
I don’t know. I read your comments twice and I just get the whole closet liberal relativity vibe. I could be wrong. If I am I’m sorry.
For example, you said, “when answers are given…” What answers? All the cases have had two questioning threads going through them.
#1 Where is he born?
#2 What is a natural born citizen?
Those questions have gone unanswered. That’s why I don’t understand your logic. I’ll admit, I’m not studying your comments. I don’t have the time. But that’s what I see.
By the way…this is just “my opinion” but you Sue…couldn’t hold a candle to Dr. Taitz!!! The truth shall set us free whether you OBOTS like it or not!
Sue–And what makes you think you are the brightest crayon in anyone’s box??? Talk about name calling!!! Where are your facts??? I guess that is what to expect from a Soetoro lover. You and 1Lishell should take your show on the road!!
This question is for Sue or Marley or 1Lishell or any other defender of mr. Obama. Please explain to me why he should not be required to make available his birth certificate to be examined. A simple question. Why should he not have to prove his eligibility?
Well if Soetero’s failure to provide his BC is such a non-issue why do you keep posting? Orly and Berg are getting closer as is Vieira. Some new stuff came out today that will solve any standing issues too. O is eventually going to have to provide proof.
Why are so many of Obama’s records sealed? Does anybody ever ask him personally? Why are both Barack and Michelle’s college records sealed? Why aren’t they being transparent?
St. Lucie,
A posting for Kerchner v. Obama should still be in my Featured Story carousel at the top of the site. Mr. Apuzzo had a few days ago submitted an amended verified complaint; I’m still waiting to hear how the Court moves forward on that case.
Thanks for the comment,
-Phil
Plains Radio seems to have posted some information regarding Orly Taitz “legal stylings.”
https://ocapps.occourts.org/CivilPub/Login.do
http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/2442810129/show/978375
Yep. Already did. Have the check.