MO State Reps Propose State Sovereignty Bill Regarding FOCA
Missouri bill HR 212 has been superseded:
This Bill Replaced with a Substitute Bill – Check Primary Bill HR294
The title of this bill is the following:
Urges the United States Congress to summarily reject the enactment of the federal Freedom of Choice Act which classifies abortion as a fundamental right and prohibits any restrictions on abortions
The full text of the bill follows.
A current listing of State-based initiatives can be found here.
FIRST REGULAR SESSION
House Resolution No. 294
95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
1396L.02I
Whereas, the 111th United States Congress is considering the Freedom of Choice Act, which purports to classify abortion as a “fundamental right”, equal in stature to the right of free speech and the right to vote – rights that, unlike abortion, are specifically enumerated in the United States Constitution; andWhereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act would invalidate any “statute, ordinance, regulation, administrative order, decision, policy, practice, or other action” of any federal, state, or local government or governmental office, or any person acting under governmental authority that would “deny or interfere with a woman’s right to choose” abortion, or that would “discriminate against the exercise of the right…in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information”; and
Whereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act would nullify any federal or state law “enacted, adopted, or implemented before, on, or after the date of its enactment” and would effectively prevent the State of Missouri from enacting similar protective measures in the future; and
Whereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act would invalidate more than 550 federal and state abortion-related laws, laws supported by the majority of the American people; and
Whereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act would specifically invalidate the following commonsense protective laws properly enacted by the State of Missouri:
(1) A parental consent law for minors seeking an abortion;
(2) A prohibition on government funding or use of public facilities for abortions;
(3) Health and safety regulation for abortion facilities;
(4) A twenty-four-hour waiting period and informed consent law that provides an opportunity to consider the gravity of a decision to abort a child;
(5) A partial birth abortion ban (Infant’s Protection Act);
(6) A requirement that only physicians can perform or induce abortions and that such physicians maintain medical malpractice insurance;
(7) Conscience protections for doctors and hospitals not wanting to perform or induce abortions;
(8) A prohibition on performing or inducing abortions in order to use fetal organs or tissue for transplantation or experimentation;
(9) Licensing of most abortion clinics as ambulatory surgical centers to ensure basic health and safety of patients;
(10) Alternatives to abortion programs to encourage and support women who do not want abortions; and
Whereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act will not make abortion safe or rare, but will instead actively promote and subsidize abortion with federal and state tax dollars and will do nothing to ensure its safety; and
Whereas, the federal Freedom of Choice Act will protect and promote the abortion industry, endanger women and their health, promote a political ideology of unregulated abortion-on-demand, and silence the voices of Americans who want to engage in a meaningful public discussion and debate over the availability, safety, and even desirability of abortion:
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the members of the House of Representatives of the Ninety-fifth General Assembly, hereby strongly oppose the federal Freedom of Choice Act and urge the United States Congress to summarily reject it; and
Be it further resolved that the Missouri House of Representatives strongly opposes the federal Freedom of Choice Act because:
(1) It seeks to circumvent the states’ general legislative authority as guaranteed by the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution;
(2) It seeks to undermine the right and responsibility of the states and the people to debate, vote on, and determine abortion policy; and
(3) The protection of women’s health through state regulation on abortion is a compelling state interest that should not be nullified by Congress;
(4) Its enactment would nullify laws in the State of Missouri that the Missouri General Assembly and the people of Missouri strongly support; and
Be it further resolved that the Chief Clerk of the Missouri House of Representatives be instructed to prepare a properly inscribed copy of this resolution for Barack Obama, President of the United States; the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States Senate; the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the United States House of Representatives; each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation; and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and the Secretary of the United States Senate with a request that the resolution be printed in the Congressional Record.
-Phil
Similar Posts:
- Abortion: The Unlikely Wrench in Healthcare
- Letter to the Editor: “Freedom for the Unborn, too”
- States’ Rights Update: Health Care, 2nd Amendment, Immigration
- MO State Rep Proposes State Constitutional Amendment on Candidate Eligibility; Update: Withdrawn
- States’ Rights Update: Arizona, Colorado, Missouri
Keep fighting please. Congress let us down and now we have only our state to help us. Kill an unborn is Murder but free the killers from 911 and is good.
[...] conservative drummer, with a state sovereignty bill up for consideration which is unique in that it specifically takes exception to the pro-abortion proposed federal Freedom of Choice law. This is conceptually similar to the bills [...]
[...] conservative drummer, with a state sovereignty bill up for consideration which is unique in that it specifically takes exception to the pro-abortion proposed federal Freedom of Choice law. This is conceptually similar to the bills [...]
[...] conservative drummer, with a state sovereignty bill up for consideration which is unique in that it specifically takes exception to the pro-abortion proposed federal Freedom of Choice law. This is conceptually similar to the bills [...]
Hi Dave S,
I read this article back in December and thought “Whatever!!”. However,in the Bible, every prediction (prophesy) that was given came true EXACTLY as the Bible said it would. These are historical facts. The world is lining up today EXACTLY as the Bible said it would. America is not mentioned in the Bible and that should make every American both terrified and thoughtful. The place you should keep your eye on is the Middle East peace process and how heavily the European Union gets involved. Also, more nations are dumping the dollar for the euro. They don’t trust us or our money. So how does Obama think he’s going to pay for his stimulus package? It’s food for thought.
Debbie
[...] Missouri regarding FOCA [...]
I am contacting my state legislators and encouraging others to do the same. Unless the states reassert their sovereignty and put Washington on notice that this is still a constitutional government, we will lose what is left of our freedoms and liberty. The time to act is now.
Nautique196,
In my opinion, all of these initiatives are meaningless until they get through both Houses of each States’ Legislatures and await a Governor’s signature (in the case of those initiatives like this one that are bills). In the case of the Resolutions, I don’t think they necessarily require a Governor’s signature; yet, they don’t carry the same weight as a bill. However, all initiatives, once completely passed, would be the first step forward in the movement for the States to re-assert their powers/authority per the Constitution, and that’s a good thing, either way you look at it.
Thanks for the comment,
-Phil
I was reading some of the 10th Amendment bills that are popping up all over. I was wondering if this is a big deal or not. It seems to me that states are getting ready to fire back at legislation that is going to get shoved down their throats. The bills are in both red and blue states. I would appreciate any thoughts on the significance. Thanks.
MO State HR 212, Thank you, Paul Revere would be proud of you!
I’m tired of Uncle Sam dictating his agenda for us!
There is sooooo much Blood on fgovs hands and I do not want my tax $ to pay for murder !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! speak up for those (babys)who can’t speak for themselves, next it will be the less beautiful and cripple
Shalom…
Dave S,
In my opinion, since we already have a number of States re-affirming their 10th Amendment rights, the thought would be that, in such a cataclysmic situation, power would radically devolve back to the States for enough time such that a new federal government could be formed.
In short, no. Having the United States become “broken up” is something for which the Constitution already accounts and would be theoretically very easy to put back together again, as long as the People and the States have a will to do so.
Thanks for the question,
-Phil
I ran across this in a comment on http://www.Americasright.com this morning. It is out there quite a ways, but it does bring up an idea for discussion and thought.
Is it remotely possible the we could be broken up one day???
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html
I think all the Patriot Reps ought to lobby the states for passage of these bills instead of going to D.C. Just boycott the phoney,usurper hellhole.That way they are really and truly working for the people.Let the DC scum write their own communist passage to hell.
GO MISSOURI. its time states startputting the fed govt in its place.. maybe all 57 states should do the same…..
ohh wait was that 58?
or still 50?
could well be in acouple of years there may be a few less than 50
will
I have linked to your post on BlogWatch: Articles about FOCA