If you are so insistent on forming your own grand jury, by all means give it a try. Where are you going to find a judge to swear your jurors to their oaths? Where are you going to find a courtroom? How are you going to receive instruction as to the law? How are you going to compel witnesses to appear? How are you going to subpoena documents? What will you do if a witness fails to comply — how will you enforce it? Do you know what rules of evidence apply and which ones do not? And when you arrive at your presentment or indictment, then what? Who will prosecute it for you?

The grand jury exists as a check and balance on prosecutors. They don’t work “for” the prosecutor, and the prosecutor does not work “for” the grand jury. They are independent, and that is what is meant by the grand jury being the fourth branch. It is figurative, not literal.

Citizens cannot, on their own, declare themselves to be a grand jury. You have to work within the existing framework.

Like we both said (differently) a prosecutor must be involved and his work is dependent on the grand jury’s decision. The prosecutor works for the grand jury.

The issue in Williams was this: “Whether an indictment may be dismissed because the government failed to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.” The Tenth Circuit, from which the government took an appeal, answered the question in the affirmative. After the language that Leo Donofrio quoted, the Supreme Court continued: “Imposing upon the prosecutor a legal obligation to present exculpatory evidence in his possession would be incompatible with this system.” Scalia reasoned that if the prosecutor had presented exculpatory evidence, and if the grand jury has chosen to disregard it (i.e., judicial nullity), the resulting indictment would nevertheless have been valid. THAT’S the point that Scalia was making.

Justice Scalia also wrote this: “It is axiomatic that the grand jury sits not to determine guilt or innocence, but to assess whether there is adequate basis for bringing a criminal charge. See United States v. Calandra, 414 U. S., at 343.”

What this means is that, at the end of the day, grand jury or no grand jury, you still need a US Attorney to prosecute.

You need to persuade a US Attorney to request a grand jury. Citizens cannot do it on their own. What you are proposing is considered vigilante justice.

WE THE PEOPLE FORM OUR OWN FEDERAL GRAND JURY, we appoint a person who is a citizen to be the JUDGE, we get a Court House Room, we appoint the JURY from a list that we gather from ORDINARY LAY PERSON CITIZENS, and IF need be, during the time that we do this we do it all for FREE, because I don’t have the money to pay for people sitting on a Grand Jury and neither do any of you, but we must do this, and then we start holding hearings on what things we want Obama, et al to produce, we hold hearings on the legality of Pelosi going to places and omitting treason while we are/were at war with the countries she visited, same with Obama, we challenge Biden on his legitimacy for VP based on his being on the ticket with Obama and possibly having knowledge of wrongdoings, we challenge all the people who are trying to subvert our country to Socialism on the things like removal of rights and others breakings of laws of the Constitution….. lets get started NOW!!!!

NOW BEFORE THEY GET WIND OF THIS HAPPENING my email is up above in my prior post

You got it, ANYONE CAN CALL A FEDERAL GRAND JURY…. lets get started.

I can’t. I’m too stretched out right now. I want to fight fight fight fight fight. But right now, I can’t. Or I can’t in this fashion. Please understand. Thanks for the invitation. I pray Godspeed in all your endeavors and God’s mighty hand of protection be upon you.

And in which states?

contact me at trthseeker5 (at) gmail (dot) com
we are working on a plan to proceed with this idea…