Not that I’m any student of the law or anything,
but if there ISN’T already a law concerning this
particular problem, would it not be the right
of ANY American citizen to question the veracity
(ESPECIALLY of a SITTING POTUS) of ANY PERSON
running for the office, under the 1st and 10th
Amendments?

The first for “Redress of Grievance”, the Tenth
for “powers not granted to the national government
nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the
STATES or the PEOPLE”?

Am I mistaken in my application? No bearing?

You don’t need any degree to question the government’s actions; you simply need to know your rights (which you obviously do).

Remember also that the only defense that the opposition to the eligibility have put up is that folks like me are “right-wing extremists” (something that apparently the Department of Homeland Security agrees with), “fringe,” “inciteful,” etc.

That doesn’t sound too rational, now, does it?

Nevertheless, no, you are not mistaken in your application. That’s exactly why sites like mine exist, despite the barrage of ad hominem attacks in my specific direction.

-Phil

June 29th is just a little over a week away,
Obama Ordered To Respond On Birth Certificate Issue
http://volubrjotr.com/2009/06/19/obama-ordered-to-respond-on-birth-certificate-issue-by-june-29-2009-in-federal-court/

Will justice finally be served, or will there be another delay?

The above is a bad link, but I have the WND article about which I’ll be posting soon.

-Phil

The first for “Redress of Grievance”, the Tenth
for “powers not granted to the national government
nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the
STATES or the PEOPLE”?

Am I mistaken in my application? No bearing?

The FACT that 22-year Senator John McCain was THOROUGHLY
“confirmed” by congress PRIOR to being ABLE to run for
President, and Obama was given a pat on the butt and
hustled into the seat that appears to have been WAITING
for him.

I am an American, born in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
I called, and for $13(U.S.), I can get a copy of MY
Long Form Birth Certificate. That isn’t a lot for me,
but I’ve only got about $200 in the bank. Unless I’m
off my count, I’m pretty sure it isn’t a matter of
FINANCES for Mr. Obama to ask Hawaii to send him HIS.

The FACT that he spent even one DOLLAR to freeze, or
close, or block such simple documents from daylight is
MORE than enough reason for ANY thinking American to
absolutely DEMAND that information be made public.

EVERY Freedom loving American should be with you on this,
and there’s just no WAY you won’t come out on top.

I’d like a look at those when you get them, and thanks
to TRUE Americans, I believe we’ll HAVE a look at them,
come hell or high water!

Thank you Mr. Apuzzo, for having testicular fortitude!

Will justice finally be served, or will there be another delay?

“51. Obama also stated publicly that he traveled to Pakistan in the 1980s. But such travel was forbidden to American citizens at that time.”

What is the source of this statement? Has anyone verified this?

My understanding is that there was a travel warning, not a travel ban.

http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/travel/cis/southasia/TA_Pakistan1981.pdf

- Steve

In Minor v. Happersett the court held that “It was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens.” The court in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark refers to the definition of Minor v. Happersett, and in Perkins v. Elg gives an example of a natural born citizen (born in New York of two naturalized-citizen parents).

By the test of Minor v. Happersett no person (wherever born) can be President of the United States unless he or she has two parents who are citizens of the U.S. at the time of the birth.