Dr. Taitz’ Upcoming Military Lawsuit to Include Obama Relative
Submitted by Phil on Thu, Jan 15, 200920 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, attorney for the Lightfoot v. Bowen case currently awaiting a Conference hearing at the Supreme Court next week, relates to TheEvilConservative that her yet-to-be-filed military lawsuit will include a Plaintiff who is a blood relative to the President-Elect:
Orly Taitz was on WVOX and said one of her plaintiffs in her lawsuit is related to Obama and he put in a request for Obama’s birth certificate. Of course Hawaii said sure, you can have it but it will take one year.
The radio interview can be heard here (the mention is towards the end of the show at the 10:00 mark).
A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.
Update: Above is a recent video from Dean Haskins.
-Phil
Satan is busy in Iran or he said it would be no problem to pick up O’s birth certificate in Hawaii.
[...] and other updates Filed under: Uncategorized — Natural Born Citizen @ 8:23 pm At the Right Side of Life we read a message by CA_MBA written on Feb, 1, 2009 CA_MBA says: February 1, 2009 at 4:09 [...]
An Open Letter to Orly Taitz:
Dear Orly,
You definitively stated in a public forum that you are co-counsel of Gary Kreep on the Keyes v Bowen #34-200880000096-CU-WM-CDS as filed in the Sacramento Superior Court and schedule to be heard 03/31/2009.
You further stated on your Official Website that you filed a writ of mandamus in the CAND Federal Court and that it is pending and/or active. The Federal docketing system does not reflect record of any case filed by either you or Allen Keyes within the entirety of the federal court system with regard to this issue. Would you be so kind as to provide the docket number?
I understand that you are an avid proponent of transparency, and since you are soliciting funds for expenses accrued as a result of your pro-bono work, would you be so kind as to provide evidence of the trust account that these funds have been deposited into as required by the California State Bar Association, as well as the docket numbers for all cases and the names of the clients on whose behalf you are soliciting donations?
I spoke with members of the investigative team at CalBar, they were specific in their requirements for the solicitation of funds by attorneys handling Pro-Bono cases. All donations must be solicited with the full knowledge and consent of the client on whose behalf the attorney is soliciting, all funds must be deposited into a trust account to ensure that there can be no co-mingling of funds, and proof of the client’s consent must be must be made available to the public. To do otherwise is a breach of ethics.
I am requesting that you provide full disclosure and transparency with regard to the above-mentioned documentation if you intend to continue soliciting donations under the guise of Pro-Bono work. Or, if you are not soliciting donations on behalf of any specific client but rather for your foundation, I am hereby requesting that you provide proof of your 501(c)3 tax-exempt status as a charitable organization.
I am sure you will make every effort to practice absolute transparency in all of your dealings with regard to this Constitutional Crisis.
Thank you
As soon as Obama signs a law or order and somebody is prosecuted for disobeying it — that person WILL have standing to raise O’s non-qualification for office as a defense, and WILL be able to subpoena the B.C. and other documents.
Maybe we should trace down the blood line and get Cheney to request it. Orly, like Phil Berg, is a tireless. This brave relative seems like the best angle so far. I do not see how a court can say the relative does not standing plus they are in the military.
If Judges decide to keep telling members of the military that they do not have standing in an election for the Commander in Chief then we have a very serious problem.
P.S. I mean, of course, if the relative shares a common ancestor with Obama.
The language “a person having a common ancestor with the registrant (e.g., a sibling, grandparent, aunt/uncle, or cousin)”; does not exhaust family relationships as I read it, because “e.g.” or “such as” seems to be only indicative of certain examples, and may not be exclusive to just those relatives listed.
I don’t know what is the relationship to Obama of the military member who is party to the lawsuit, but perhaps he/she could have a direct and tangible interest in obtaining O’s BC if they share a common ancestor somewhere, somehow.
Hi jbjd,
(Funny how we keep bumping into our blogger buddies all over the place! I know you are an attorney just by the way you write and, of course, your grasp of legal implications. . .then, there’s that “jd” part of your identity you got going on.)
I am wondering if this relative does have a direct and tangible interest in the record because of the relative’s military status and being party to the lawsuit? Is “direct and tangible” explained anywhere in HI’s directive, as far as you know? Or is there an “understood meaning” of the terms in jurisprudence land?
The question is not IF there will be an interdiction of Obama’s Presidency by the Supreme Court, the questions are WHEN and HOW that interdiction will transpire — that is, if the USA is to continue as the Constitutional Republic that now exists.
According to the HI law cited, this ‘relative’ of BO has no right to access his vital records, absent a court order.
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html
If someone wants a cert quicker they should go in person. That method has always been 2 or 3 times faster.
Also, from an account of one of Stanley Ann Dunham’s high school friends, Barack’s mother was excited about Barack Sr. returning to Africa after his education was completed. Stanley Ann may have registered Barack’s birth with a British Consular Affairs office in Seattle after his birth.
SvenMagnussen,
It is possible that this is exactly the lead of which Mr. Pidgeon spoke in his latest release (see my Featured Stories carousel for the exact posting).
Thanks for the comment,
-Phil
If Barack was born in a hospital in the British Protectorate of Zanzibar in 1961, then the UK will have a copy of his Birth Record in London. A relative could request a copy of it.
Hawaii’s new laws, um, cover-up:
As of January 2009, certified copies will normally be sent out within 2-3 weeks after receipt and approval of the application. The return time may be extended for records that are very old, because the search to locate the record may take longer, or in the process of being filed, because the official record is still being created.
What Information You Should Be Prepared to Provide
An applicant/requestor must provide the information needed to 1) establish his/her direct and tangible interest in the record and 2) locate the desired record. This will normally include:
Applicant’s name, address, and telephone number(s);
Applicant’s relationship to the person named on the certificate;
Reason why you are requesting the certificate;
Full name(s) as listed on the certificate;
The certificate’s file number (if known);
Month, day, and year of the event; and
City or town and the island where the event occurred.
For birth certificates, also provide the full name of the father and the full maiden name of the mother.
If you are applying for a certificate on behalf of someone else, you must provide an original letter signed by that person authorizing the release of their certificate to you.
Letters of Verification
Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). This document verifies the existence of a birth/death/marriage/divorce certificate on file with the Department of Health and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event. (For example, that a certain named individual was born on a certain date at a certain place.) The verification process will not, however, disclose information about the vital event contained within the certificate that is unknown to and not provided by the applicant in the request.
Letters of verification are requested in similar fashion and using the same request forms as for certified copies.
The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.
They sure don’t guarantee much in Hawaii, if it regards O!
(double entendre intended)
Wasn’t it Obama himself who said that Dick Cheney is a “blood relative”?
Now wouldn’t that be paradoxically and ironically delicious if this relative turns out to be the VP!
Yes but she has to get an attorney in another state to step up and stand in for her for that state. Has she found an attorney yet? Does anyone know?
Susan Irwin,
Hawaiian State statutes probably allow for kin to see birth certificates; they probably don’t guarantee a speedy return.
Thanks for the comment,
-Phil
If Obama’s blood relative requests to see Obama’s birth certificate and Hawaii says, “sure, you can have it a year from now.” Isn’t that “obstruction of justice?” What’s the penalty for obstruction of justice?
Wow! That ought to speed up the presses for the Globe.I’m going to buy them.I promise.
This woman is very determined!Ha!