Keyes v. Lingle: Case Dismissed; Forensic Examiner Disproves Online COLB
Another case that had been flying under the radar was Keyes v. Lingle, where the Constitution Party and Dr. Amb. Alan Keyes were petitioning against Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle, Chief Elections Officer Kevin B. Cronin, and various other Defendants as a means of holding an official accountable for determining Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility.
Documentation:
You will notice that the case was dismissed on a technicality (according to the judge, the Plaintiffs referred to the wrong Hawaiian statute(s)), not on content.
However, the bigger story to this lawsuit is the fact that forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines (pictured) has documented in an associated affidavit (PDF) the following:
2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik,” [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.
3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.
4. In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all. [emphasis mine]
The above clearly illustrates that it is impossible to determine eligibility based on the widely-circulated certification of live birth and that the only way to determine Barack Hussein Obama’s natural born citizenship status is to retrieve the currently-sealed certificate of live birth.
It appears that we’re dealing with an individual who has so much to hide on so little a document.
Update: A couple of other articles related to this posting:
- BAD SCIENCE: HOW NOT TO DO IMAGE ANALYSIS PART II (HackerFactor.com)
- Hawaii officials declare Obama birth certificate genuine (HonoluluAdvertiser.com; old article stating a relatively obvious assertion: BHOII’s original certificate is real and sealed)
-Phil
Similar Posts:
- HI COLB: Verified Non-Credentials versus (Partially) Unverified Credentials
- Eligibility Update: Why Eligibility is Questioned; IL, TX Grand Juries; Update: Dual Citizenship on Obama
- Certifigate: Kenyan BR “Likely Not Authentic;” Birth in Kenya Not Ruled Out
- Dunham v. Obama: Document Confirms Fatherhood, FactCheck.org UK-Kenyan Colonial Law
- This Week in the Courts
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Certification of Live Birth — Released – Counterfeit — Case and Affidavits [...]
I would gladly certify the genuiness of Obama’s birth certificate if it was written on toilet paper with a pen dipped in feces only if he offers me $900 million in cash and promises to ” BLOW HIMSELF UP like a good little Muslim terrorist” when the time comes and he is told to confess, ask for Forgivness and Plead to keep his job as the 1st Muslim Dictator of the USA ( and he chooses to ” RUN AWAY ” ! ! ! ! and pull a pin.
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] and an expert court witness…but then I still take everything with a grain of salt. The Right Side of Life Keyes v. Lingle: Case Dismissed; Forensic Examiner Disproves Online COLB __________________ Don function fbs_click() [...]
D Right One,
Most Americans assume that proper vetting is officially done by the government. Unfortunately, it is not. See my Qualifications category for information on this subject.
-Phil
You guys have expended a lot of time, energy, and money at a non-issue. I have to believe that your organization could have spent the money and time towards solving some real problems in this world such as hunger, job creation, building houses with Habitat for Humanity etc instead of chasing after a piece of paper in a vault somewhere. If you need to present a birth certificate for employment, you give them a copy from the local Health Dept. I can only assume that was done and certified by the US government. I can only assume that no conspiracy took place in certifying that he was eligible for running. If not, why do we not have this big argument about every election for President in the US. Why was McCain not given the fifth degree by you folks? He wasn’t born in the US at all. Even if Obama was born elsewhere by an American mother, guess what! He’s still American!!!
I wish someone would explain to me as why McCain did not go after this hard during the campaign. Why was he allowed to run, I don’t understand the corruption that takes place.
I do believe he has “lots” to hide, but why is it being ignored??
Cant you guys just get a Judge and a militia, storm the bastille
and make them produce the original vault copy? This has gone on long enough.
I mean if the powers at bay could get a smudged palm print placed on a mannliker-carcano rifle 50 yrs ago …..
it should be really easy to get the vault opened before the new powers at bay find a 1961 typewriter old blank certificate stock with the right border and TADA! make a completely but fake birth certificate.
you better bust this fraud wide open – the curing process needed for aging the paper to the ink is almost completed.
[...] Keyes v. Lingle: Forensic Examiner and IT Expert Disprove Certification of Live Birth [...]
[...] Certification of Live Birth — Released – Counterfeit – Case and Affidavits [...]
[...] Certification of Live Birth — Released – Counterfeit – Case and Affidavits [...]
You need to read “Bad Stridence: credentials do not equal credibility”(bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com) in which I totally destroy that “Bad science” nonsense, written by Neal Krawetz, about my 160-page, Final Report which he never read before writing it (and he still has not read it, but continues to carp about it).
Signatures on Soetoro and Obama divorce papers don’t match with Ann Dunham handwriting samples circa high school days. View handwriting samples with divorce papers signatures with source links.
http://home.att.net/~south.tower/Annwriting1.htm
Alleged Obama Mama was divorced twice according to the OBAMA story. However all Ann Dunham signatures on the two sets of divorce papers don’t match Ann Dunham handwriting samples circa high school days. View the samples and signatures with source links:
http://home.att.net/~south.tower/Annwriting1.htm
Stephanie,
Keyes v. Lingle should not be confused with Keyes v. Bowen, his first (“main”) case currently pending in California.
I do not know at this time what Dr. Taitz and Keyes are going to do with their now dismissed Hawaiian case (though obviously it produced some great documentation for the record).
Thanks for the comment,
-Phil
Can Dr. Abm. Alan Keyes refile this suit because it was dismissed on a technicality? Was it dismissed with prejudice?
InfoBro:
You make/infer an accusation of the motives of others that is trivially easy to disprove. In doing so, it throws the burden back on you to show what evidence you have that your motive in questioning the motives of others is anything but base and improper.
The issues that separate this person from all others that have ever been in a similar situation are two undeniable commonly known facts: (1) The man’s father was not an American citizen. (2) The man was raised during his formative years in a foreign country.
Those who try to warp this into a racial issue are being clearly dishonest. There is no need to inject race into the question of NatBornCit in this case. The questions arise naturally from the known history of the individual in question. That history, not race, is entirely sufficient to explain the many doubts. Those who ignore that history and seek to persuade others that racial bigotry is the sole motivating factor are themselves engaging in a racially-motivated deliberate attempt to obscure this simple truth for nefarious purposes. It is not even a case of the pot calling the kettle black. It is more like a case of the pot calling the pure driven snow black. You tired old excuse has worn thin, has worn out. In this case, IMHO, it is transparently obvious that you speak a lie.
–John
Jim D,
No problem. I don’t post anything until I have documentation in hand, anyway.
-Phil
Phil,
No doubt you too have heard Ed Hale say say tonight on Plains Radio that there is a “US port of entry birth certificate on file for Obama” issued “4 days after his birth in Kenya.” That would mean 8/8/61. He is requesting legal advice from counsel on air as to how to go about obtaining the document. Doesn’t say how he knows this, just that it is so.
As for the divorce decree, the only item of any interest that I could see is that his parents were married 2/2/61 and that Obama II was born 6+ months later on 8/4/61.
No more comments from me–I promise–until I hear something more definitive.