http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-judicial-review-allowed-only-after.html

Title: “Is the Judicial Review Allowed Only After the Electoral College Vote and Congressional Certification?”

Notice the point that courts have previously seen to it that third party candidate(s) were removed — but not McCain, nor Obama. Operative term, “bipartisan combine?”

Washington warned us about the encroaching powers of political parties.

SCOTUS order lists for Donofrio, Wrotnowski:

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/121508zor.pdf

On the SCOTUS website, click on Orders and Journals, October 2008 Session,the the dates Dec. 8th and Dec. 15th.
If you do a search just from the Docket, it just says Denied. From the Orders and Journals link, it lists the cases under Cases Pending. It’s kinda confusing. I agree with Phil’s comments on the status and the reasoning he offers for how SCOTUS may be thinking. Sure hope he’s right! This is the best site I’ve seen on updates and information.

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

Leo, Cort and Phil will have their day in court when a flawed election process has run the course and Obama is the President elect.

The Justices would not want to go down in history as “The Grinch That Stole Christmas”, with such a fragile economy facing the country.

Preparations by the Government need to be made for Security and Safety of the population if a ruling effects the votes of so many Americans. January can be a bitterly cold month that might keep people at home rather than spilling into the streets to riot.

If you look at Phil’s case it has been treated the same as Leo’s and Cort’s cases before the court. Emergency Requests/Motions need to be ruled on in a timely manner, but the meat of the cases still live on in the Court.

If the Justices were to tip their hand too early there would be a cloud over any ruling they would issue. 0nce the Congress votes the Supreme Court can rule since the flawed process is complete.

The Supreme Court already has a copy of Obama’s birth certificate filed with the passport application when his mother applied for his passport in 1962. The government can share this information within the government, just not outside. Everyone who applies for government services for security clearances, naturalization or passport services signs a release of information to the government. The Freedom of Information Act of 1974 only applies to that information released outside of the Federal Government.

Be patient folks, the SC is holding a straight flush Ace high.

If you click http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com you may find the text of the September federal court decision (not recalling the name of the Judge at the moment and I’m blocked from getting into my own blog because it contains a civil word or two that are blocked from the system I am using). The title of that piece is “Is the Judicial Review Allowed Only After the Electoral College Vote and Congressional Certification?”

Yes, Patriot is government’s duty to assure valid candidates, but where the Constitution already describes a power of the federal Legislative branch to oversee this, it is critical for the SCOTUS not to intervene. (That is utterly different than Bush v. Gore, in which the SCOTUS took measures after-the-fact, to reverse the Florida’s Supreme Court’s decision to do just what the SCOTUS has thusfar refused to do: to intervene when jurisdiction is constitutionally that of other branches of government.)

What America’s constitutional republic drastically needs now, is for at least one senator and at least one representative of Congress to object to the Certification of BHO II. Also, any real patriots in Congress between now and January 8, must prepare a petition for injunction and review (certiorari) in the likely case that, after each house of Congress meets/caucuses on the subject, if Obama is certified.

I believe it is no mere happenstance that the Berg case is to be heard on January 9! I also believe there may be some intention behind the Donofrio v. Wells case being labled “pending,” despite its appeal for injunction being denied.

Pending is the word — pending until after the events of January 8.

Instead of licking wounds, our very highly esteemed friend of the republic, Mr. Donofrio and his colleagues of Washington, California, Pennsylvania, etc., etc. should be all about the question of how to take a case (already existing or otherwise) to the Supreme Court, in the event that at least two competent patriots are not found in our U.S. Congress.

If we do not hang together….