Because she was an unwed mother, by US law, in that situation, birthright is ONLY given through the mother.

The unwed mother would have had to have resided in the United States for the year preceding the birth of her child.

However, since Stanley Ann Dunham says that she lived in Hawaii for the year preceding little Barack Obama II’s birth, she could NOT have passed on US citizenship to him. And this is why:

BECAUSE

Hawaii had NOT become joined to the United States at that time, and was not for several years afterwards.

Therefore, Barack Obama II was NOT given ANY US citizenship at birth.

Therefore at least in terms of his birth, Barack Obama II has no US natural born citizenship.

As such, Barack Obama II has NO eligibility to run for President of the United States.

Darn those anti-bigamy laws anyway!

Enjoy.

People might notice that I placed copies of this post of mine on other websites/forums. I am just trying to get people to think about this as an alternative point of view in case the ones being used don’t get anywhere.

ref: DOMANTAY, MARGARITO I. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

But Leo’s Certiorari was not denied… does that suggest his case is still alive and Certiorari is pending further review or…

But they haven’t really gotten to the question of “Natural Born Citizen” yet. Most cases are denied due to lack of standing or excuses by those in authority that they have “no authority”. And we don’t know the reason for denial in Leo’s case. It could very well be the messy NJ courts mishandling which then muddies any basis for SCOTUS acceptance.

glsmarlton
December 8th, 2008 12:21
Kris, I would think that if all the courts had evidence of a real BC they would mention it, one would assume.

That’s the Catch 22. No one as yet has that concrete evidence. There is only supposition and lack of action on the part of Obama to prove otherwise. The proof then, so far, seems to be the burden of those who are presenting their cases. Either they somehow get it, or they are relying only on the benevolence of the courts to order it – and then on what basis? Again, that Catch 22.

Cort’s case seems to have established a basis for his SOS to have the authority to ask to see those items that would establish eligibility when there is real question about the candidate.

BTW, Phil, where can we read Cort’s entire filing? Thanks for all your good work here.

I do believe that, if people would be willing and could afford it, cases should just continue as an ongoing background setting for Obama’s everyday actions as “President”. Maybe, after so long, the public (maybe even the libs/progressives who are becoming more and more disillusioned with their messiah of change who just isn’t “changing” on their behalf) will get the drum beat and see the man behind the curtain. Maybe then, also, the media will see some reason to start chopping down the foundation for him that they themselves created and also look more closely to those unanswered questions about him. Because those who yelled “Bush” and “Change” for everything are now looking at their candidate’s most recent declarations and seeing “4 more years of Bush”! How ironic!!

We need to start to plan now. There is over 7.5 Trillon in 40-1s nationwide and he knows this. This is where he plans to hit first. I will not allow what little I have saved for him to give to people who refuse to work.

Give us readers your opinion please!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/08/scotus-rejects-appeal-questioning-obamas-citizenship/

“Many legal analysts questioned Donofrio’s argument.”

“The law has always been understood to be, if you are born here, you’re a natural born citizen,” said Thomas Goldstein, founder of the Scotusblog.com Web site, and a lawyer who has argued numerous cases before the high court. “And that is particularly true in this case, when you have a U.S. citizen parent like Barack Obama’s mother.”

It’s a mistake to claim that members of the Supreme Court have “committed acts of treason or violated their oaths of office.”

When all of the cases that have been brought before all of the courts have all gotten the same results, isn’t that a sign that maybe this is not a winning argument?

However, if he infact is not a NBC as we all believe, then our military will NEVER have to obey his orders. Each service member swears the same oath to uphold our constitution as Obama is supposed to. But if he refuses, as we all know, that he is not, by not providing proof of his NBC , then our militiary does not owe allienge to him, only our country. I believe he knows this and this is why he plans on a more powerful, bigger and more funded civilian military of his own.

It’s quite obvious to all that this was a well planned action by him and his radical friends to take over our country from the inside out. This is truly getting scary.

Someone last night wrote on Donofrio’s website about the plans of stealing our 40-1s to redistribute and apparently this will happen since it looks like he may be elected. Guard your money and assets, as I believe now his entire plan was for this to happen.

What’s next–where do we go from here?

Not only can the parties use the most popular faces to garner electoral votes and then elect their won Pres and VP their own in congress when none fail to quality, it seems they can also put in power those not qualified, and defraud the electorate of a right to vote for valid candidates in any race.

We have just lost not only the Constitution, but the right to vote and have all our rights defended.

This is the end of the Republic.

Is it that they truly believe that the question of dual loyalties at time of birth is simply not, to their minds, an impediment, or what? I would truly like to get Clarence Thomas to speak to what this decision was based upon. Did they think that ruling for a stay would not do anything without some other basis in precedent for arguing the case, after that, for Natural Born Citizen?

Can we make those calls again for the court to explain to all the concerned citizens and speak to our need to know what this ruling was based upon?

I would love to know the numbers re: the vote of the court.

This leaves us with the needed action to bombard Senators and Reps with their requirement to know, when they certify this man, whether he is legitimate or not. They only listen to numbers and actions of real concern. The world needs to know that millions still consider there to be a cloud over this presidency as far as its legitimacy.

Now it would appear that our country will suffer what it may deserve due to its failure to remain loyal to its expectations and responsible for its many blessings. It has, by its own volition, brought in a man with the knowledge thay he condones (as well as his wife) brutality against the most vulnerable to the point of Partial Birth Abortion and Infanticide. He will, eventually, destroy more foundations such as our faithful military and marriage. We will be purified for this. We will finally learn that “legal technicalities” have gotten to the point that they overrule our very protections and those who hate the country are now defended above and beyond our most concerned citizens.