<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candidate Qualification: Responses from Colorado, South Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/</link>
	<description>Questioning everything, in love, for the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:40:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ??????????</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>??????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>The Honorable Judge Scalia is a graduate of the University of Chicago?  This video reveals Hon. Judge Scalia views of the Constitution and law.  

2008 National Lawyers Convention-Hon.Judge Antonin Scalia, US Supreme Court 11-22-2008:
http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1193/pub_detail.asp#video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Honorable Judge Scalia is a graduate of the University of Chicago?  This video reveals Hon. Judge Scalia views of the Constitution and law.  </p>
<p>2008 National Lawyers Convention-Hon.Judge Antonin Scalia, US Supreme Court 11-22-2008:<br />
<a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1193/pub_detail.asp#video" rel="nofollow">http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1193/pub_detail.asp#video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ??????????</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>??????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Senate proves McCain eligible and Obama ineligible??:
http://mcpalinmavericks.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/senate-proves-obama-ineligible/
http://www.hillarysvillage.net/showthread.php?t=4400

Amending the US Constitution&#039;s &quot;Natural Born Citizen&quot; clause for Obama and Arnold???:
http://www.theurbangrind.net/?p=3438
http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate proves McCain eligible and Obama ineligible??:<br />
<a href="http://mcpalinmavericks.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/senate-proves-obama-ineligible/" rel="nofollow">http://mcpalinmavericks.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/senate-proves-obama-ineligible/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hillarysvillage.net/showthread.php?t=4400" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillarysvillage.net/showthread.php?t=4400</a></p>
<p>Amending the US Constitution&#8217;s &#8220;Natural Born Citizen&#8221; clause for Obama and Arnold???:<br />
<a href="http://www.theurbangrind.net/?p=3438" rel="nofollow">http://www.theurbangrind.net/?p=3438</a><br />
<a href="http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis DahSheaks</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DahSheaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>Tom DahSheaks,
Thanks for reading and commenting!
-Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom DahSheaks,<br />
Thanks for reading and commenting!<br />
-Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom DahSheaks</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom DahSheaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Very usefull post.
Thanks.
P.S. I like your writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very usefull post.<br />
Thanks.<br />
P.S. I like your writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-918</guid>
		<description>The Senate Resolution has two flaws, in my opinion.

First, it is non-binding and constitutes only a &quot;sense of the Senate&quot; which even by its own terms violates the separation of powers which give to the Judicial branch the right to interpret the law and particularly the U.S. Constitution.

Second, the Senate Resolution alludes to the Naturalization Act of 1790 which adopted the term &quot;natural born citizen&quot; in governing citizenship of a child born overseas to two U.S. citizens but it FAILS to mention that the Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed that language and substituted only &quot;citizen&quot;.

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=227

Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103):
 &quot;the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens&quot; 

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=538

Naturalization Act of January 29, 1795 (1 Stat. 414):
&quot;the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as Citizens&quot; 

Here is a link to more information, from sponsor Sen. Leahy&#039;s website, which relates to S. 511

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html

I would note that the Constitutional delegation of authority to the Legislative branch addresses that latter body&#039;s right to write laws relating to citizenship, as follows:

Section 8 - Powers of Congress 

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; 
To borrow money on the credit of the United States; 
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; 
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; 
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; 
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; 
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;  etc.

The uniform Rule of Naturalization might empower decisions about citizenship, allowing Congress to establish citizenship through Statute, but might restrict any attempt to legislate &quot;natural born citizen&quot; status.  There must be some kind of legislative history which tracked the 1795 law and addresses why the words &quot;natural born&quot; were stripped out.  Could it possibly be that the Congress (many of them the original Framers) felt that the delegation of a power to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization had been exceeded by the 1790 version when it used &quot;natural born&quot; terminology? 

Someone who believed McCain to be disqualified posted this information in a Blog, which quotes the two older laws and then the current U.S. Code governing births outside the U.S. and citizenship rights:

http://12angrymen.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/natural-born-citizens-a-congressional-bed-time-story/

Leo agrees with the conclusion but disagrees with attempts to rely on common law; the Constitution was intended to create &quot;national law&quot; which would set U.S.A. apart from England when it came to the supreme law of the country.

This last link is to a template offered up by a Harvard Law graduate now teaching at Ohio State University&#039;s law school for gaining &quot;standing&quot; to litigate these cases.

http://www.michiganlawreview.org/firstimpressions/vol107/tokaji.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate Resolution has two flaws, in my opinion.</p>
<p>First, it is non-binding and constitutes only a &#8220;sense of the Senate&#8221; which even by its own terms violates the separation of powers which give to the Judicial branch the right to interpret the law and particularly the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>Second, the Senate Resolution alludes to the Naturalization Act of 1790 which adopted the term &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221; in governing citizenship of a child born overseas to two U.S. citizens but it FAILS to mention that the Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed that language and substituted only &#8220;citizen&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=227" rel="nofollow">http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=227</a></p>
<p>Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103):<br />
 &#8220;the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=538" rel="nofollow">http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&amp;fileName=001/llsl001.db&amp;recNum=538</a></p>
<p>Naturalization Act of January 29, 1795 (1 Stat. 414):<br />
&#8220;the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as Citizens&#8221; </p>
<p>Here is a link to more information, from sponsor Sen. Leahy&#8217;s website, which relates to S. 511</p>
<p><a href="http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html" rel="nofollow">http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html</a></p>
<p>I would note that the Constitutional delegation of authority to the Legislative branch addresses that latter body&#8217;s right to write laws relating to citizenship, as follows:</p>
<p>Section 8 &#8211; Powers of Congress </p>
<p>The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;<br />
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;<br />
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;<br />
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;<br />
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;<br />
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;<br />
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;  etc.</p>
<p>The uniform Rule of Naturalization might empower decisions about citizenship, allowing Congress to establish citizenship through Statute, but might restrict any attempt to legislate &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221; status.  There must be some kind of legislative history which tracked the 1795 law and addresses why the words &#8220;natural born&#8221; were stripped out.  Could it possibly be that the Congress (many of them the original Framers) felt that the delegation of a power to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization had been exceeded by the 1790 version when it used &#8220;natural born&#8221; terminology? </p>
<p>Someone who believed McCain to be disqualified posted this information in a Blog, which quotes the two older laws and then the current U.S. Code governing births outside the U.S. and citizenship rights:</p>
<p><a href="http://12angrymen.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/natural-born-citizens-a-congressional-bed-time-story/" rel="nofollow">http://12angrymen.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/natural-born-citizens-a-congressional-bed-time-story/</a></p>
<p>Leo agrees with the conclusion but disagrees with attempts to rely on common law; the Constitution was intended to create &#8220;national law&#8221; which would set U.S.A. apart from England when it came to the supreme law of the country.</p>
<p>This last link is to a template offered up by a Harvard Law graduate now teaching at Ohio State University&#8217;s law school for gaining &#8220;standing&#8221; to litigate these cases.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.michiganlawreview.org/firstimpressions/vol107/tokaji.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.michiganlawreview.org/firstimpressions/vol107/tokaji.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-873</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barack Obama declared himself to be eligible for the presidency&quot;

So in other words, no one checked him out and he declared himself to be eligible to run for President of The United States of America without any type of background check or without actually going through the vetting process?

What the heck, and now the Democratic party are just going to try and sweep this under the rug for what? Too try and save face?   What a shame.......

The least Obama can to do is return the favor.....

S. Res. 511: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen

&quot;&quot;States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a &quot;natural born Citizen&quot; under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.&quot;&quot;

-Sponser	
Sen. Claire McCaskill [D-MO]

-Cosponsors [as of 2008-11-07]
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT]
Sen. Jim Webb [D-VA]
Sen. Thomas Coburn [R-OK]
Sen. Hillary Clinton [D-NY]
Sen. Barack Obama [D-IL]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-511

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/show

Thomas Library of Congress
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.RES.511:

**Added a couple links just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Barack Obama declared himself to be eligible for the presidency&#8221;</p>
<p>So in other words, no one checked him out and he declared himself to be eligible to run for President of The United States of America without any type of background check or without actually going through the vetting process?</p>
<p>What the heck, and now the Democratic party are just going to try and sweep this under the rug for what? Too try and save face?   What a shame&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>The least Obama can to do is return the favor&#8230;..</p>
<p>S. Res. 511: A resolution recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a &#8220;natural born Citizen&#8221; under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.&#8221;"</p>
<p>-Sponser<br />
Sen. Claire McCaskill [D-MO]</p>
<p>-Cosponsors [as of 2008-11-07]<br />
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT]<br />
Sen. Jim Webb [D-VA]<br />
Sen. Thomas Coburn [R-OK]<br />
Sen. Hillary Clinton [D-NY]<br />
Sen. Barack Obama [D-IL]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-511" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-511</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/show" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/show</a></p>
<p>Thomas Library of Congress<br />
<a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.RES.511" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.RES.511</a>:</p>
<p>**Added a couple links just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candidate Qualification: Responses from Colorado, South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/05/candidate-qualification-responses-from-colorado-south-carolina/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Candidate Qualification: Responses from Colorado, South Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1649#comment-870</guid>
		<description>[...] Candidate Qualification: Responses from Colorado, South Carolina SaveOurRights Wiki: Vetting Candidates; State Links for Election Law. The first follow up had to do with his conversations with the Colorado Democratic Party Chairwoman. Heâ€™s still trying to get an answer. The second is a long-emailed &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Candidate Qualification: Responses from Colorado, South Carolina SaveOurRights Wiki: Vetting Candidates; State Links for Election Law. The first follow up had to do with his conversations with the Colorado Democratic Party Chairwoman. Heâ€™s still trying to get an answer. The second is a long-emailed &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
