Christopher Strunk, being pro se in two cases (one in DC District Court and another appealing to the Supreme Court), served the Supreme Court with an application for Writ of Mandamus to Associate Justice Ginsburg yesterday and served the DC District Court with a Writ as well.

The following is an excerpt from an email I received along with associated PDF documents.

I am currently tracking eligibility lawsuits via my Current Lawsuit Listing page.

State Justice ruled on the State Consitutional issues today in the Article 78; however, left the Federal dual office holder issue unreasolved and will be part of my appeal in 2nd Circuit in 08-cv-4289.

 

Yesterday I took a bus to DC and filed the SCOTUS Applcation under Rule 22 for a Writ of Mandamus to restrain the NY Electoral Collgee and for relief in the matter of 2nd circuit review of my substantive due process request for a three judge panel instead of signle political science oriented Judge (Katzmann).

 

In addition I went into DCDC to find out if they have moved mu complaint there which although they have had it since 112608, but done nothing- I served them with a copy of the DC Circuit apopllication for a writ of mandamus kicking the DCDC ass on the poor person matter.

 

Anyway they work is in the hopper and the SCOTUS matter as per the letters of transmittal below at least Justice Thomas should have something from New York for the Conference tomorrow for the other aopplications from NJ, CT and suppose PA and CA.

His mentioning California refers to a vigorous push that Dr. Orly Taitz is pursuing in getting her second case, Lightfoot v. Bowen, sent forthwith to the Supreme Court.

Documents substantiating Chris’s email:

• Motion to Prohibit Respondents from Serving as Electors (PDF, 281kb)
• US DC Appellate Court Petition for Writ of Mandamus (PDF, 1.5MB)
• SCOTUS Rule 22 application to the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsberg for an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus under SCOTUS Rule 21 or Rule 23 (PDF, 3.67MB)