Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Renewed Stay Application to Justice Scalia
Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, reports today that Cort Wrotnowski’s renewed Stay Application of Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz has been officially tendered to the Supreme Court Saturday, November 29, 2008.
Leo and Cort are now awaiting the docket to be formally updated (we know how that goes!).
Update:Â Leo said, “We are also hoping to see my supplemental brief docketed and distributed to the Justices today.” That part is now there, and distributed to the Justices.
Below includes the full posting…
WROTNOWSKI V. CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE RENEWED TO JUSTICEÂ SCALIA
Posted in Uncategorized on December 1, 2008 by naturalborncitizenToday we are watching for the SCOTUS AUTOMATED Docket to be updated with two important developments, one in Cort’s case and one in mine.
We hope the docket will reflect that Cort Wrotnowski has renewed his application to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of this morning. Cort’s application for an emergency stay and/or injunction was denied by the Honorable Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on November 26, 2008. Cort sent it by Express mail on Saturday Nov. 29, 2008.
We are also hoping to see my supplemental brief docketed and distributed to the Justices today. This was sent via FED EX on Wed. Nov. 26 and was delivered on Friday Nov. 28 at 9:05 AM, but it still hasn’t been updated to the docket…see Fed ex tracking number 866846734555
I have a call in to a case manager as well as to a supervisor. Hopefully the docket will be updated today.The supplemental brief only has one point, a discussion of Cort Wrotnowski’s case and a full disclosure to the SCOTUS that I helped Cort prepare his application.
Also, I will have another blog later today concerning the most recent update to the Donofrio v. Wells docket which hit the docket Nov. 28, but was backdated to Nov. 19. That entry states that the application was referred to the Court by Justice Thomas. This supplements the “DISTRIBUTED for Conference†entry and sheds some light on the issue. What remains a mystery is why this was updated nine days late.
Check back later for full coverage.
[...] v. Bysiewicz. Apparently, after Cort called the Supreme Court requesting an update of his emergency stay renewal, he spoke with a certain individual who allegedly stated that his particular case (docket) had been [...]
[...] v. Bysiewicz. Apparently, after Cort called the Supreme Court requesting an update of his emergency stay renewal, he spoke with a certain individual who allegedly stated that his particular case (docket) had been [...]
[...] to Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. It has also been properly back-dated to November 29, as was originally sent prior to the “suspicion” of [...]
[...] v. Bysiewicz. Apparently, after Cort called the Supreme Court requesting an update of his emergency stay renewal, he spoke with a certain individual who allegedly stated that his particular case (docket) had been [...]
“Dirty Pool” at the Supreme Court apparently on behalf of Obama currently usurping YOUR Constitution: Leo Donofrio’s companion case, brought by Cort Wrotnowski, with fuller/better briefing showing Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” reportedly has been sidetracked to the anthrax lab to deprive the full Court from seeing those filings in connection with Donofrio’s case this Friday, Dec 5, 2008. DO SOMETHING AMERICA!!!
[...] « Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Renewed Stay Application to Justice Scalia [...]
Can someone explain in layman’s terms what this means and what will happen because of this.
Thank you.
Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, reports today that Cort Wrotnowski’s renewed Stay Application of Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz has been officially tendered to the Supreme Court Saturday, November 29, 2008.
Leo and Cort are now awaiting the docket to be formally updated (we know how that goes!).
Update: Leo said, “We are also hoping to see my supplemental brief docketed and distributed to the Justices today.†That part is now there, and distributed to the Justices.
What I find disturbing is backdating at a place revered for it’s formality. I am a lawyer who has practiced law at the trial and appellate level for 35 yrs. This is unheard of. It appears your Supp. brief was docketed, and distributed,before Fed Ex says it was delivered. Are we missing something?