<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Donofrio v. Wells, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Major Updates on Conference, Cort&#8217;s Renewed Application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/</link>
	<description>Questioning everything, in love, for the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:40:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>save to my Bookmarks )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>save to my Bookmarks )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disinfo</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Disinfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>Rich,    Post #13
You&#039;re a LIAR or I&#039;m mistaken!

You&#039;re whole argument centers on this quote of yours:

&quot;Under the Naturalization Act of 1795, amended in 1798, a person had to be 14 years a resident of the US, giving 5 years intent on becoming a US citizen.&quot;

But searching Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization#In_the_United_States

&quot;The Naturalization Act of 1795 set the initial parameters ... resident for five years or more. The Naturalization Act of 1798, part of the Alien and Sedition Acts...requirement from five to fourteen years...It was repealed in 1802.&quot;

It was repealed in 1802. Did you forget that Rich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,    Post #13<br />
You&#8217;re a LIAR or I&#8217;m mistaken!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re whole argument centers on this quote of yours:</p>
<p>&#8220;Under the Naturalization Act of 1795, amended in 1798, a person had to be 14 years a resident of the US, giving 5 years intent on becoming a US citizen.&#8221;</p>
<p>But searching Wikipedia:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization#In_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization#In_the_United_States</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Naturalization Act of 1795 set the initial parameters &#8230; resident for five years or more. The Naturalization Act of 1798, part of the Alien and Sedition Acts&#8230;requirement from five to fourteen years&#8230;It was repealed in 1802.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was repealed in 1802. Did you forget that Rich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getrealpeople</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>getrealpeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-855</guid>
		<description>Hang on to your tin foil hats people the paddy wagon is on its way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on to your tin foil hats people the paddy wagon is on its way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asthecrowflies</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>asthecrowflies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Obama has already admitted that he is a &quot;Citizen of the World.&quot;

http://www.groundbreaking.com/Good_Sam/Rhyme003.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has already admitted that he is a &#8220;Citizen of the World.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.groundbreaking.com/Good_Sam/Rhyme003.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.groundbreaking.com/Good_Sam/Rhyme003.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uscitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>uscitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-796</guid>
		<description>If I understand right there are two more hurdles before Jan. 20 electoral college Jan.15 and Jan. 6 conformation by congress. Congress will confirm because of partizenship even if he is not legal voters remember this when election comes around for congress if we ever have anymore. America batten down the hattaches we are in for a storm no matter what!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand right there are two more hurdles before Jan. 20 electoral college Jan.15 and Jan. 6 conformation by congress. Congress will confirm because of partizenship even if he is not legal voters remember this when election comes around for congress if we ever have anymore. America batten down the hattaches we are in for a storm no matter what!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Think about how and why, and who got  this man elected and you will surely understand that nothing will stand in the way of his presidency. The power brokers have annointed their chosen one. Mark my words, nothing will come of this. Absolutely positively nothing. You are peeing on the big dog&#039;s porch.  Imagine the unrest in this country at this crucial time in history if the SCOTUS were to rule in Denofrio&#039;s favor. It will be swept under the rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about how and why, and who got  this man elected and you will surely understand that nothing will stand in the way of his presidency. The power brokers have annointed their chosen one. Mark my words, nothing will come of this. Absolutely positively nothing. You are peeing on the big dog&#8217;s porch.  Imagine the unrest in this country at this crucial time in history if the SCOTUS were to rule in Denofrio&#8217;s favor. It will be swept under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-790</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree that Chester A. Arthur will be a precedent which will undermine Denofrio&#039;s efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree that Chester A. Arthur will be a precedent which will undermine Denofrio&#8217;s efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syd manfried</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>syd manfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-784</guid>
		<description>As to Chester Arthur&#039;s father... the 1798 naturalization act was repealed by the act of 1802 which returned the requisite to five years of residence to naturalize.  the 14 years requirement was only in existence between 1798 and 1801.

So Chester Arthur&#039;s father would have only needed to be a resident for five years, not 14. He married an American woman in 1821 and they had Chester in 1829 or 1830, nobody is sure which year Arthur was born.  Regardless, Arthur was haunted with claims of ineligibility for POTUS from then until now.  Hardly the President you&#039;d want to hang your hat on to prove eligibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to Chester Arthur&#8217;s father&#8230; the 1798 naturalization act was repealed by the act of 1802 which returned the requisite to five years of residence to naturalize.  the 14 years requirement was only in existence between 1798 and 1801.</p>
<p>So Chester Arthur&#8217;s father would have only needed to be a resident for five years, not 14. He married an American woman in 1821 and they had Chester in 1829 or 1830, nobody is sure which year Arthur was born.  Regardless, Arthur was haunted with claims of ineligibility for POTUS from then until now.  Hardly the President you&#8217;d want to hang your hat on to prove eligibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Response to Rich

The matter of Chester A. Arthur and this precident is not the issue, it does not apply to B. Hussein. It is a red herring. No one denies Obama&#039;s father&#039;s non-American  status. The issue is  can his American citizen mother pass on &quot;natural born &quot; citizenship if the birth occured outside the US, it&#039;s territories and possesions. Here is the catch. Between 1952 and 1986 the law clearly states that an American citizen mother can only pass on natural born citizenship if she has been in the US for a minimum of 5 years  AFTER the age of fourteen. She gave birth  to little Barry in Kenya at the age of 18.
So to the would be king and his blind followers: TOUGH NOODLES !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to Rich</p>
<p>The matter of Chester A. Arthur and this precident is not the issue, it does not apply to B. Hussein. It is a red herring. No one denies Obama&#8217;s father&#8217;s non-American  status. The issue is  can his American citizen mother pass on &#8220;natural born &#8221; citizenship if the birth occured outside the US, it&#8217;s territories and possesions. Here is the catch. Between 1952 and 1986 the law clearly states that an American citizen mother can only pass on natural born citizenship if she has been in the US for a minimum of 5 years  AFTER the age of fourteen. She gave birth  to little Barry in Kenya at the age of 18.<br />
So to the would be king and his blind followers: TOUGH NOODLES !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-778</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court does not like to issue rulings on whether hypothetical future events would be constitutional.  Therefore, do not expect a ruling from the Supreme Court until Monday December 17, the first business day after the electors meet.  They will likely direct the FEC to establish a procedure for certifying federal candidates prior to elections in the future.

Per the 20th Amendment (passed in 1933) if the President cannot serve the VP becomes acting president.  That would put a President-Elect who is not a citizen in limbo (and prevent Biden from naming a new VP) until Obama either tenders his resignation or is impeached and removed by Congress.

It would be a felony for a non-citizen to vote.  As I understand it, Obama has never voted.  He also resigned from the Senate a couple weeks ago...Senators are constitutionally required to be citizens for at least 7 years.  Obama has dodged making sworn responses to the claim that he is not a US citizen and not a natural-born US citizen, so that keeps him out of legal jeopardy for perjury.  I doubt that either President Bush or President Biden would want their US Attorneys to prosecute Obama for fundraising fraud, out of fear of causing race riots.  So Obama will surely walk free after perpetrating one of the grandest frauds in US History.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court does not like to issue rulings on whether hypothetical future events would be constitutional.  Therefore, do not expect a ruling from the Supreme Court until Monday December 17, the first business day after the electors meet.  They will likely direct the FEC to establish a procedure for certifying federal candidates prior to elections in the future.</p>
<p>Per the 20th Amendment (passed in 1933) if the President cannot serve the VP becomes acting president.  That would put a President-Elect who is not a citizen in limbo (and prevent Biden from naming a new VP) until Obama either tenders his resignation or is impeached and removed by Congress.</p>
<p>It would be a felony for a non-citizen to vote.  As I understand it, Obama has never voted.  He also resigned from the Senate a couple weeks ago&#8230;Senators are constitutionally required to be citizens for at least 7 years.  Obama has dodged making sworn responses to the claim that he is not a US citizen and not a natural-born US citizen, so that keeps him out of legal jeopardy for perjury.  I doubt that either President Bush or President Biden would want their US Attorneys to prosecute Obama for fundraising fraud, out of fear of causing race riots.  So Obama will surely walk free after perpetrating one of the grandest frauds in US History.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrateNation.com&#124;Irate Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>IrateNation.com&#124;Irate Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-773</guid>
		<description>[...] Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, has been able to confirm that his case was referred to the full Court by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. This means that, per the docket, all 9 Justices have agreed to hold a Conference this Friday, December 5 to consider granting Certiorari. If this is granted, then the &#8220;Rule of Four&#8221; concept will then be in play.  If 4 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative to Leo&#8217;s case, there will be an oral argument and further briefing. If 5 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative, they could grant a stay of the Electoral College vote. Whoa!  The Right Side of Life Blog Archive Donofrio v. Wells, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Major Updates on Con... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, has been able to confirm that his case was referred to the full Court by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. This means that, per the docket, all 9 Justices have agreed to hold a Conference this Friday, December 5 to consider granting Certiorari. If this is granted, then the &#8220;Rule of Four&#8221; concept will then be in play.  If 4 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative to Leo&#8217;s case, there will be an oral argument and further briefing. If 5 of the 9 Justices respond in the affirmative, they could grant a stay of the Electoral College vote. Whoa!  The Right Side of Life Blog Archive Donofrio v. Wells, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Major Updates on Con&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AzCit</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>AzCit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-772</guid>
		<description>We just want the truth.  Obama, show us the original birth certificate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just want the truth.  Obama, show us the original birth certificate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Tom in Texas,
The Electoral College meets to vote by December 15.
Thanks for commenting,
-Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom in Texas,<br />
The Electoral College meets to vote by December 15.<br />
Thanks for commenting,<br />
-Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Don Little Mind:

Osama is President &lt;b&gt;after&lt;/b&gt; the Electorial College votes him President (Dec.21st?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Little Mind:</p>
<p>Osama is President <b>after</b> the Electorial College votes him President (Dec.21st?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristotle the Hun</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/12/01/donofrio-v-wells-wrotnowski-v-bysiewicz-major-updates-on-conference-corts-renewed-application/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotle the Hun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1317#comment-766</guid>
		<description>I will never accept Obama as legally President until I am satisfied that he is a natural born citizen.  If it is proven that he is a natural born citizen and is legally established as President I will begin immediately to work to have him impeached for election and fund raising fraud.  This nation will not be safe until Obama is behind bars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never accept Obama as legally President until I am satisfied that he is a natural born citizen.  If it is proven that he is a natural born citizen and is legally established as President I will begin immediately to work to have him impeached for election and fund raising fraud.  This nation will not be safe until Obama is behind bars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
