2008 Election

This is where the action is regarding President-elect Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility

2010 Election

Will the Dems lose their majorities by November 2, 2010?

Initiatives

American reform has always started from the bottom, up. Track various State-based reformation initiatives here

Money

It makes the world go around, especially DC and Wall Street

Qualifications

Who’s checking up on officeholder eligibility? Find out here

Home » Activism, Clerk's Office, Eligibility, POTUS, SCOTUS, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz: Clerk Bickell Allegedly Obstructing Justice on Another Emergency Stay Application

Submitted by Phil on Wed, Nov 26, 20085 Comments

Today, Leo Donofrio, Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, reported on Mr. Cort Wrotnowski’s emergency stay case from Connecticut. He says that Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) Clerk Danny Bickell is again denying Mr. Wrotnsowski’s motion in similar fashion as he did to Mr. Donofrio’s (see that whole saga here).

Media alert: Wrotnowski and Donofrio will be interviewed by Bob Vernon on the Plains radio Network at 10:30PM EST; Mr. Donofrio was also on the Scott Hennen show today (MP3). This was the first main stream media exposure of the case. Please see the link and look for an audio file at this blog to be uploaded soon.

SCOTUS Docket: 08a469

A full posting is available below.

PDF document: Connecticut Supreme Court order of Chief Justic Chase Rogers.

TREASON AT SCOTUS? BICKELL OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AGAIN IN WROTNOWSKI V. CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE

- Wrotnowski and Donofrio will be interviewed by Bob Vernon on the Plains radio Network at 10:30PM EST.

- Mr. Donofrio was also on the Scott Hennenshow today. This was the first main stream media exposure of the case. Please see the link and look for an audio file at this blog to be uploaded soon.


US Supreme Court stay clerk Danny Bickell is guilty of obstruction of justice for the second time. Yesterday, Cort Wrotnowski filed an emergency stay application in the case WROTNOWSKI V. BYSIEWICZ, CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE, which is coming directly from a Connecticut Supreme Court order of Chief Justic Chase Rogers.        

Mr. Wrotnowski was informed by Danny Bickellthat Mr. Bickell denied Cort’s motion based on Rule 23.3, the same grounds Mr. Bickell had illegally improperly relied on to obstructDonofrio v. Wells [docket], the same case which is now going before the entire Supreme Court for Conference of Dec. 5th and to which Donofrio has pointed out Mr. Bickell was guilty of attemping to overturn Justice Powell’s holding in McCarthy v. Briscoe 429 U.S. 1317 n.1 (1976) and Justice O’Connerin Western Airlines, Inc. v. Teamsters, 480 U.S. 1301 (1987). 

Furthermore, the issue was fully briefed – in the application submitted to the SCOTUS yesterday by Mr. Wrotnowski based on Donofrio’sresearch, and Donofrio’s fear that Bickell would try to pull the same obstruction of justice again.

Furthermore, Mr. Bickell is fully aware that the Supreme Court is hearing this issue in full conference despite Bickell’s best attempts to stop that from happening.

Donofrio (me) believes Mr. Wrotnowski’s case is at least as strong as his own, if not stronger. And Donofrio warned Wrotnowski that Bickellwas going to try the same tactic again.

Donofrio was right. Today, Bickell informed Wrotnowski that he was refusing to pass the emergency stay application on to Justice Ginsberg.
In a follow up phone call, Mr. Wrotnowski pointed out to Mr. Bickell that the issues he raised were properly briefed in the application and that it was the job of a Supreme Court Justices to make decisions of substantive law, not Mr. Bickell. Bickell then berated with mocking insults.

Mr. Wrotnowski has been through two lower courts and is now using our US Supreme Court rules to properly petition our Supreme Court for relief. This is outrageous and Mr. Bickell needs to be fired immediately and brought up on criminal charges for obstruction of justice, and possibly treason.

Courageously, Mr. Wrotnowski refused to back down and eventually Bickell said he would, reluctantly, docket the case.

As of 12:38 PM the case has not been docketed.

If you think that justice has been obstructed then please voice your opinions to the appropriate authorities. This is a very urgent issue which is now causing out entire system of justice to be overturned by a single clerk.

Mr. Wrotnowski

[UPDATE. WROTNOWSKI V. BYSIEWICZ, CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF STATE… 

…has been docketed, despite having initially been denied process by the SCOTUS stay clerk, Danny Bickell. Wrotnowski’s case has been submitted to the Honorable Associate Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Circuit Justice for the 2nd Circuit (includes Connecticut).

 

 

No. 08A469  
Title:
Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:  
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:    
Cort Wrotnowski 1057 North Street (202) 862-8554
  Greenwich, CT  
Party name: Cort Wrotnowski


US

5 Comments »

  • Red Pill says:

    An important thing to remember is that there is more than just the birth certificate issue.

    There is also the issue the candidate known as Barack Hussein Obama II is also known as Indonesian citizen Barry Soetoro.

    And on top of that, serious consideration should be given to section 3 of the 14th amendment. Has Obama/Soetoro given aid and comfort to enemies of the United States? Including, but not limited to, “family friend” William Ayers…

  • Jody says:

    Good Work Leo helping out getting another case into SCOTUS! Let’s all pray that the justices won’t let us down!

  • roxe says:

    In my short lifetime experiences with men called “Danny”, it is becoming clear to me that adult men who keep using their childhood name of “Danny” have very serious emotional issues. So it is no surprise to me that this “Danny” appears to be a controller, with delusions of grandeur.

  • glsmarlton says:

    JoeE

    Well said!

  • JoeE says:

    It seems that anarchy or some fascistic element is beginning to raise its putrified head in the hightest court of the land as well. Personally, I am becoming increasingly nauseated by all of this hideousnss. Why hasn’t Bickell, at the very minimum, been seriously reprimanded

    Who, by the way, are the appropriate authorities? Who, if anyone, will take this situation seriously and with integrity and diligence?

    If you cannot find integrity and respect for the Constitution in the Supreme Court we really are finished. Or, perhaps it is time for that next revolution that the framers of that great document insisted was an unfortunate but occasional necessity.

    “Give me liberty or give me death”? Are there sufficient patriots with that passion, valor, integrity and courage? Or, like those at the end of the Roman Empire, have most of us become weak, decadent, complacent, and so easily able to be taken over by the barbaric hordes?

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.