SOS Lawsuits: CT Supreme Court Hears Cort Wrotnowski’s Case, Pam Patterson Heard in CA Supreme Court

Posted on 11/3/2008 by Phil

This could be the beginning of really big news today…

Peoplespassions.org presser:

Cort Wrotnowski of Connecticut filed suit against the Secretary of state last week and will be heard before the Connecticut Supreme Court today. He will argue that Obama has fraudulently displayed an irrelevant document claiming it validated his claim to Natural born Citizenship when in fact it does not. Copy of his filing may be found at http://www.peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/Lawsuits/CTpleading_%20Motion.htm.

While there has been much controversy from one expert camp or another demonstrating that even groups like snopes or factcheck have become partisan, Wrotnowski sidesteps the whole question of authenticity and proves that Obama is displaying the wrong document altogether and is making fraudulent claims that it proves citizenship when it does not.

The two very different certificates can be seen side by side at this site – no experts required. Anyone can easily understand. http://www.peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/Birth_Certificate.htm

This effort is on the heels of 2 recent lawsuits in Ohio and 1 in Washington State by Steve Marquis. The message is the same that Mr. Obama is hiding something Big and is using every effort to keep it that way. No lawsuit to date has been through out on the merits of the case, Obama’s skillful use of technicalities has shielded him to date on having to answer one substantive question and NO birth Certificate has yet to be released.

Complicit allies in some media circles have tried to downplay lawsuit after lawsuit, but they wont go away but keep building because the people demand to know and wont go away quietly into the night!

Cort argued, “It is preposterous that Mr. Obama is flaunting this fraud and wont pony up his vault copy birth certificate” A recent AP story about the Hawaiian Health Department officials notably failed to confirm any detail that would tell us which if any Hawaiian city /hospital he was born in. Notable the Certification of birth” Obama display is in fact routinely issued for babied born out of State by mothers claiming Hawaiian previous residency

The two birth certificates are shown side by side at this web site and it does not take an expert to see the problem – You could not get on most little league teams with the Barack version!

In a Separate Lawsuit in California, Monday 11/3 Pam Patterson Esq of California, a Lawyer will argue in Superior Court. She filed suit naming Obama himself and several complicit government entities which she argues should have had some reasonable oversight but did nothing as the Obama machine trampled the constitution regarding the persistent issue accusing him of not being a non-natural born citizen. Pam will argue that “only someone perpetrating a fraud would withhold this document that is freely used and shown by most all Americans. What does that say about Barack?”

I’m also going to be watching out on the Electoral College electors suit as well.

-Phil

Update:

Cort Wrotnowski (who lead the CT SOS lawsuit) mentioned the following to me in email:

As has been happening to many of us, I did not lose on merits but on the phony issue of “standing”.  The judge in the CT  Supreme Court ruled against me on the basis of “jurisdiction” as in I did not have standing.  Our government employees really resent that “you work for me” argument.

 

Anyway,  that is what happened.  Tomorrow’s outcome will likely dictate our next move.  Personally, I would keep pursuing Obama no matter what until he coughed up that birth certificate.  He put the country through this, we deserve an answer.

Update:

Newsday.com reports from the AP the following on the CT lawsuit:

HARTFORD, Conn. – A Connecticut judge dismissed a lawsuit Monday that alleged election fraud and questioned whether Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was qualified to appear on the ballot for Election Day.

State Supreme Court Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers dismissed the case after hearing testimony from the state and a Greenwich man who bought the action.

The plaintiff, Cort Wrotnowski, challenged the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate. The lawsuit is similar to at least seven others filed in state courts across the country that cite a lack of evidence that Obama wasn’t born in the United States.

Officials in Hawaii have said there’s no doubt the Democratic presidential candidate was born there.

Wrotnowski, who runs a health food store and is a registered Republican, represented himself in the hearing at Hartford Superior Court. He said Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz has the obligation to ensure that Obama is qualified to appear on the ballot.

“It’s a fundamental point, which is this document has not been produced,” he said after the hearing. “I’m not the first, not the last, just among a growing number of people across the country who’ve become distressed about the lack of disclosure.”

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal argued on behalf of Bysiewicz and the state.

“I’m delighted that the court has soundly and quickly rejected a baseless, bogus claim that’s apparently part of a nationwide effort to confuse or derail the election,” he said.

Obama leads Republican John McCain in Connecticut and in many national polls.

Part of what the CT SOS was saying in her defense was the following:

Does the Secretary of State, as the Chief of Elections, have the responsibility to protect Connecticut voters from election fraud, including national elections conducted within the state?

The Connecticut Secretary of State asserts in an email to the plaintiff:

“…I do not have the statutory authority to remove a candidate from the ballot unless that candidate officially withdraws by filling a form with my office to that effect.”

She also asserts:

“Likewise, neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate’s eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States. Because this is a matter prescribed in the Constitution of the United States, and absent any authority and/or procedures in our state constitution, the question of the verification of a Presidential candidate’s status as a “natural born” citizen is a federal matter subject to U.S. Congressional action…”

Plaintiff asserts the Secretary of State has misread the law and is instead the state officer directly responsible for preventing election fraud against Connecticut voters in a national election. In this most important regard the Secretary of State has failed to act to secure the public confidence and avoid the appearance and actuality of fraud. There is no law restricting the secretary of state from investigating fraud as she claimed. Ridiculous!

Silence constitutes an implied representation of the existence of the state of facts in question and will operate as an estoppel.

“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297, 299 (5th Cir. 1977), quoting U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 and Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906).; [emphasis theirs]