<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymous Obama Staffer Claims Insider Details on Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/11/01/anonymous-obama-staffer-claims-insider-details-on-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/11/01/anonymous-obama-staffer-claims-insider-details-on-campaign/</link>
	<description>Questioning everything, in love, for the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:40:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: American Daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/11/01/anonymous-obama-staffer-claims-insider-details-on-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>American Daughter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=381#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Dear Music Producer,

If you look at a Gaussian distribution of voting personalities, from liberal to conservative -- and I&#039;m talking personality, not political affiliation -- the 80% starting from the conservative end of the spectrum are the ones who hang up on surveys.  The 20% most liberal are the ones who talk to strangers (including pollsters) over the phone, who discuss their sex life with friends, who wear revealing clothes, who talk about personal finances and how much their possessions cost, who tell everyone how they feel about things, etc.  As folk get more conservative, or we might say circumspect, they &quot;hold their cards closer to the chest.&quot;

There is a political correlation, not one to one, but significant.  Those who have conservative mind-their-own-business personalities are much more likely to be conservative politically.  So the 80% of voters who do not participate in polls are much more likely to be conservate, causing the polls to be skewed liberal.

Goodness!  Perhaps I should make a post out of this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Music Producer,</p>
<p>If you look at a Gaussian distribution of voting personalities, from liberal to conservative &#8212; and I&#8217;m talking personality, not political affiliation &#8212; the 80% starting from the conservative end of the spectrum are the ones who hang up on surveys.  The 20% most liberal are the ones who talk to strangers (including pollsters) over the phone, who discuss their sex life with friends, who wear revealing clothes, who talk about personal finances and how much their possessions cost, who tell everyone how they feel about things, etc.  As folk get more conservative, or we might say circumspect, they &#8220;hold their cards closer to the chest.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a political correlation, not one to one, but significant.  Those who have conservative mind-their-own-business personalities are much more likely to be conservative politically.  So the 80% of voters who do not participate in polls are much more likely to be conservate, causing the polls to be skewed liberal.</p>
<p>Goodness!  Perhaps I should make a post out of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL13</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/11/01/anonymous-obama-staffer-claims-insider-details-on-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>DL13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=381#comment-58</guid>
		<description>The more I see what Obama stands for, the less I like what I see. Will the people see through the mesmerism in time? I ask myself, which of the two candidates would I buy a used car from? McCain, all the way, a candidate whose decisions my children and grandchildren can live with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I see what Obama stands for, the less I like what I see. Will the people see through the mesmerism in time? I ask myself, which of the two candidates would I buy a used car from? McCain, all the way, a candidate whose decisions my children and grandchildren can live with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Producer</title>
		<link>http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2008/11/01/anonymous-obama-staffer-claims-insider-details-on-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=381#comment-57</guid>
		<description>While it has not been â€œsecond-sourced,â€ it does seem to possess all the proper odors to pass an initial smell test.  What caught my eye in the story was a brief statement about pollsters receiving up to an 80% â€œrefuse to respondâ€ result.  Let that sink in . . . 80%.  So, that would mean, out of all the calls theyâ€™re making, they are sometimes only getting results from 20% of them.  But, this isnâ€™t a reported statistic . . . if it were, how long do you think these poll-takers would have jobs?

So, I asked myself, â€œWho likely participates in polls?â€  I ask that because I know I donâ€™t trust the polls, and I donâ€™t accept unsolicited phone callsâ€”Republican or Democratâ€”and I figure there must be other likeminded citizens out there.  I imagine that a large number of those â€œrefuse to respondsâ€ are folks who, just like me, simply say, â€œPlease remove my phone number from your listâ€ (after the dismaying revelation that the Federal â€œDo Not Callâ€ Registry really doesnâ€™t mean â€œDo Not Callâ€).

Back to the question, â€œWho likely participates in polls?â€  I believe those who are more likely to respond to these polls are folks who tend to trust them.  And, as far as those who are more likely to trust the polls, I would guess they are those who see the polls as supporting their own personal choices.

Thus, even if that â€œ80%â€ figure is greatly exaggeratedâ€”letâ€™s imagine even half of thatâ€”that would still mean up to 60% of the called voting public has simply not weighed in via these polls, and those who have are probably those who trust the polls, which should be understood to be those supporting Democrats.  

Another thought: of those who readily respond to polls, which of the two presidential candidates would participators likely refuse to state they are NOT supporting (Yes, I arrived at a positive via double negative)?  Would it be Republicans who support Obama?  What motivation would they have for that, seeing that the vast MSMâ€™s propaganda machine would clearly laud them for backing whom they have decided is the runaway victor.  Or, would it be the loyal, but disenfranchised, Democrat, who would rather not admit heâ€™s backing the â€œotherâ€ partyâ€™s candidate?

This scenario also seems to add credence to a couple reports Iâ€™ve heard in the past few days about GOP internal polling showing McCain ahead in most statesâ€”even strongly Democratic states.  One internal poll shows McCain ahead in strongly Democratic NJ and MI, and only behind by 1% in Pelosiâ€™s CA!

Now, this looks more like the America I know and love.

Dean Haskins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it has not been â€œsecond-sourced,â€ it does seem to possess all the proper odors to pass an initial smell test.  What caught my eye in the story was a brief statement about pollsters receiving up to an 80% â€œrefuse to respondâ€ result.  Let that sink in . . . 80%.  So, that would mean, out of all the calls theyâ€™re making, they are sometimes only getting results from 20% of them.  But, this isnâ€™t a reported statistic . . . if it were, how long do you think these poll-takers would have jobs?</p>
<p>So, I asked myself, â€œWho likely participates in polls?â€  I ask that because I know I donâ€™t trust the polls, and I donâ€™t accept unsolicited phone callsâ€”Republican or Democratâ€”and I figure there must be other likeminded citizens out there.  I imagine that a large number of those â€œrefuse to respondsâ€ are folks who, just like me, simply say, â€œPlease remove my phone number from your listâ€ (after the dismaying revelation that the Federal â€œDo Not Callâ€ Registry really doesnâ€™t mean â€œDo Not Callâ€).</p>
<p>Back to the question, â€œWho likely participates in polls?â€  I believe those who are more likely to respond to these polls are folks who tend to trust them.  And, as far as those who are more likely to trust the polls, I would guess they are those who see the polls as supporting their own personal choices.</p>
<p>Thus, even if that â€œ80%â€ figure is greatly exaggeratedâ€”letâ€™s imagine even half of thatâ€”that would still mean up to 60% of the called voting public has simply not weighed in via these polls, and those who have are probably those who trust the polls, which should be understood to be those supporting Democrats.  </p>
<p>Another thought: of those who readily respond to polls, which of the two presidential candidates would participators likely refuse to state they are NOT supporting (Yes, I arrived at a positive via double negative)?  Would it be Republicans who support Obama?  What motivation would they have for that, seeing that the vast MSMâ€™s propaganda machine would clearly laud them for backing whom they have decided is the runaway victor.  Or, would it be the loyal, but disenfranchised, Democrat, who would rather not admit heâ€™s backing the â€œotherâ€ partyâ€™s candidate?</p>
<p>This scenario also seems to add credence to a couple reports Iâ€™ve heard in the past few days about GOP internal polling showing McCain ahead in most statesâ€”even strongly Democratic states.  One internal poll shows McCain ahead in strongly Democratic NJ and MI, and only behind by 1% in Pelosiâ€™s CA!</p>
<p>Now, this looks more like the America I know and love.</p>
<p>Dean Haskins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
