Here’s another doozy of an op-ed from the folks at API:

Looking at what happened in Kenya during last year’s Presidential elections, one may understand why bloodshed is around every street corner and home in America. In Kenya last year, everybody sang the song of change and change was to be at whatever cost, people said. Those who wanted some excitement wanted immediate change, but got bloodshed in the end and lost families. Kenyans were not prepared for the bloodshed that followed, bringing the country to a standstill for 4 months. People were killed. Neighbours murdered neighbours in the name of change. So Americans should be prepared for that which may come in the name of change.

It is good to have change, but change that people are prepared to deal with. Kenya did not get the change promised by some leaders, even after brainwashing their followers making them to believe that President Mwai Kibaki was a old man who could die of health reasons. Some were brainwashed that the best thing for Kenya was to have change by electing a younger man in the name of Raila Odinga to be the President of the Republic. My fear is coming from here, now that Americans have been brainwashed that McCain is old and may die in office and the best for America is to have a younger man in the name of Obama. Most of those who were brainwashed in Kenya got wild when they did not get Raila as the president. Some chose to accept defeat while others chose to go on rampage raping and killing their neighbours. If Kenyans were ignored by the international community when the bloodshed started, the country would be very unstable today. The country was rescued from a brink of collapse, thanks to the international community. Who will rescue America, the most powerful Nation in the world if they start travelling on the road of bloodshed?.

 

When people talk about change it is a very good thing. But the question they should ask is, yes we want change, but, change from what to what? People should know where they are heading to and should not be blinded and misled to fight for change they do not know where it is leading them to.

And about those who think it’s “racist” to question Sen. Obama:

When some voters speak out against John McCain the Republican, they are branded racists if they are not white. When some voters speak out against Barack Hussein Obama, they are branded racists. Some people have forgotten the values of being a good human being. A black man or woman, for example, will be considered mad if he decides not to support Obama just for the simple fact that he is black and has Kenyan roots. The roots where he gets the charisma that enables him to feel he will save the Americans from world hate by inviting leaders of hostile countries to dine in the White House.

 

Therefore, blacks should not vote for Barack Hussein Obama just because he is a black man, and likewise, the white people should not vote for John McCain for the simple reason that he is a white man. Vote wisely and do not bring yourself into a situation of sorrow whereby you as a voter will regret to have been told but never listened.

I can only imagine that using such remarks as “bloodshed” and whatnot is meant to heighten the Chief Editor’s passions about this issue. Could the US have riots immediately after November 4? Of course — one could always suspect that there will always be a portion of the population becoming completely unagreeable with an election’s outcome. The question would be, to what degree? In fact, a recent article over on Drudge (sorry, don’t have the link) mentioned how police precincts across the nation have beefed up their patrols in major cities just in case of either outcome.

-Phil